• takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    Sadly no. The way they turned it around was very clever.

    So they said that only official presidential business is immune, but were ambiguous what that actually means, so inevitably they made it so it would go through them to determine what is the official business.

    Second thing is that they picked up from their ass that Constitution also says that no official business can be used in any trial, even if it is unrelated. This not only jeopardizes all the indictments he had, it possibly will negate the New York trial.

    trump already submitted request to have it referred based on this SCOTUS ruling.

    This election might be the last free election we have. And even if trump loses it will still not be over.

    Please vote and make your friends and family vote. And not just for president but also for the Congress.

    Edit: I also recommend everyone a book “On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons From the Twentieth Century” (there’s also reading on YouTube) all the warning signs are present. The more people are aware what it is at stake the higher chance that this can be stopped.

    • everett@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 年前

      I also recommend everyone a book “On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons From the Twentieth Century”

      In case it makes a difference to someone, it’s a pretty short book.

    • jettrscga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 年前

      How does one prove whether or not something is official business if official business can’t be used in any trial?

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        For all intents and purposes does. Just SCOTUS made itself as a final check on what is an official act and what isn’t.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        Trump could kill anyone and they would determine that it was official business. On the other hand, Biden could have the Republican judges executed and replaced with sycophants who could rule that this also was an official act. It’s a bad ruling.

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 年前

      So officially dissolve the Supreme Court and instate a new pack of judges and let those judges decide if it was an “Official Act” and thus totally legal.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 年前

        The NY trial was unrelated to his presidential business anyways. It was about private property and fraud relating therein.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          But also, other states that have indicted him for Jan 6th activity are unaffected by this, regardless of how Trump could spin this.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        We are dealing with an openly partisan court. Normally this wouldn’t affect it, but they already broke a lot of rules.