• Zier
    link
    fedilink
    864 months ago

    No woman, anywhere in the world, should ever be required to wear any of these. Humans should be respected to make their own personal choices.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      324 months ago

      Sure, but many women choose to wear these and that’s fine if that’s what they want to do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        354 months ago

        It’s also worn out of fear. People falsly believe it protects you from sexual assault.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          124 months ago

          Sure, but the vast majority of people wear it because it part of their religion and they want to.

          I’m not religious in the slightest, but I support people’s right to choose.

          We never seem to see people complaining about what nuns wear, which I find to be a double standard.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            134 months ago

            We never seem to see people complaining about what nuns wear, which I find to be a double standard.

            Different context. Nuns wear their costume when they are serving. That’s why you don’t see nuns in full dress at Walmart.

            But I see women in full burkas (always with their husband, of course) struggling in everyday situations.

            If the religion requires it, it’s a terribly oppressive one. These women “chose” not to face consequences, so they wear it. That’s why there are international protests by women who call to reject these fabric cages.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            124 months ago

            No. Majority of women wear it because of sexist opression. They don’t have the real choice of not wearing it even if they believe they wear it “because I want to”.

            Also, using nuns is not a valid argument, because

            1. it’s a uniform and
            2. nuns are nuns because they devote their lives, amongst other things, to not have children. Do those women depicted swore chastity and celibacy?
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            74 months ago

            Neither do I care what people wear. I’m just stating a misleading factor behind the attire.

            Also, I never see nuns in public.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Do you even Sister Act?

              Edit:

              Came back to add a serious element to the comment. I worked at a gas station for years right near a Catholic Church. I knew all of the nuns, and I can’t speak on the tradition everywhere, but I never seen them wearing their nun gear.

              I wouldn’t have even known they were nuns if I wasn’t told. The one I got tight with had a short haircut and wore blue jeans and flannel. I always assumed she worked on a farm somewhere nearby or something until she told me she was a nun. My family was struggling and I was talking to a friend about coming up with the money for my electric bill. She overheard me and asked me to stop by her church and fill out a form. She told me she was a nun when I met her at the church.

          • @WallsToTheBalls
            link
            English
            124 months ago

            They aren’t.

            It’s literally enforced by the government

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              54 months ago

              I didn’t know my government, the UK, was enforcing people wearing religious clothing. TIL.

              • @WallsToTheBalls
                link
                English
                94 months ago

                That’s a very obtuse response and the governments I’m referencing are obvious.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  44 months ago

                  I’m having a discussion on the usage in general, you and the other replies have been highlighting minority cases.

                  I wonder if you’re so passionate about this issue, what you’re doing to further women’s rights in these countries you have issue with?

      • Zier
        link
        fedilink
        164 months ago

        Choose and Required are opposites.

          • Zier
            link
            fedilink
            134 months ago

            Not in countries controlled by religion.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              So the issue isn’t religion its authoritarianism in these countries.

              Perhaps, we should fight against that rather than the garments in question, no?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          This is not true of every part of islamic culture, but there’s an anti-western focus that is a part of a lot of cultural traditions. The idea for a lot is that if a Kafar (effectively, a sinner/etc) is involved, you shouldn’t be, so that rules out most top tier brands. I’m way out of date because I’m not close to that world anymore, but every once in awhile, you’d see a major player throw something out… Like adidas had a line for a minute that they tried to make a big deal, but I never saw any big brands that you’d recognize in any Islamic shops and I never knew anyone who had even heard that was happening beyond me. Most of the girls I knew stuck to Hijabs which are incredibly simple, it’s basically a four cornered sheet of cloth that you wrap around your head real fancy, so the focus was mostly on type of fabric and patterning, not a lot of room to establish higher tiers of hijabs/etc.

          Branding as a whole kind of goes against the concept of the head coverings too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          I’ve no idea. I’m not religious so don’t really know.

          I imagine you can get various tiers from cheap -> expensive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Nobody should be allowed to say Allah without protest. If somebody says Allah in casual conversation, they should be met with scoffs, eye-rolls, and dirty looks. Muslims should say ilah instead.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          I am very happy for Muslims to talk about their ilah. But when they say Allah, they are choosing to say the other gods are fake for no reason. We could be having a completely unrelated conversation about, say, Ramadan, and the Muslim just has to say “by the way your gods are fake” in a single word just to be an asshole. It’s rude. It’s mean. It’s unnecessary.

          I think a lot of people downvoted my comment because they don’t understand Arabic etymology and they think I’m being Islamophobic. But this isn’t about Islam, it’s about the way many Muslims choose to talk about every other religion. And yes, many Muslims don’t know the etymology of the word either. Which is why they should be educated and told to do better. Allah is a slur. We should make it clear it’s not acceptable to say in polite company.

          I also hate it when Christians choose to use “god” as a proper noun. I’ve got in lots of fights with people on Lemmy about that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          There’s more than one, you ding dong. Why do you have to start a debate about the number of gods out of nowhere?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Typical. I get my comment deleted for opposing misogynist ideologies. Stay reddit, mods.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    294 months ago

    Clothing fit for making a clear statement they are not on the same level as men. Is this compatible with modern society, inherent human needs and equality?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      324 months ago

      Easy answer, yes if they are doing it of their own free will with informed consent. People can wear whatever they want.

      Hard question, does heavy cultural pressure and implied threats of violence impact your ability to ever truly give informed consent?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        104 months ago

        Exactly. Although it does get a little dicey when you factor in cultural conditioning. Some women are devout by choice—but if they grew up in the religion it’s impossible to determine if that devoutness is a truly held belief or if they’ve been essentially brainwashed. I don’t mean to say there’s some insidious plot of brainwashing, but there’s really no other way to describe deep, long term conditioning from a dominant in-group.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    254 months ago

    This is probably just cause I’m on NCD too much but does the last one kinda look like a stealth fighter?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    134 months ago

    Crazy how many completely different names there are for different kinds of clothing that’s sooooo close to each other.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 months ago

      How many different kinds of hats with entirely different names do you own? I have a sun hat, a toque, a helmet, a rain cap, one of those ones with flaps that I don’t know the name of but probably has one, and I’m sure half of you own a fedora and a trilby.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        I see your point and I think the hats are a better example than the trousers comment below. Especially when it comes to traditional clothing, there’s a ton of different, very specialized hats with special names and for a 3rd person might be all just ‘hats’. Thanks for the analogy. :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      Islamic world is what - 40 countries? 50? Im not suprised at all. How many different words can be used to describe pants just in Europe alone?

      Pants Knickers Slacks Trousers Bloomers Briefs Britches Pantaloons

      And thats just English synonyms, how many languages are in Europe? There are easily 100 words in Europe for the cloth tubes you stick your legs in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Pants, Knickers, Slacks, Trousers, Bloomers, Briefs, Britches, Pantaloons

        Aren’t these just synonyms for the more or less same thing and not different concepts that just (almost) look alike? The pure existence of this guide implies that the nuances between these kinds of clothing are so important that you should be able to differentiate them. And Hijab and Shayla seem to me almost identical. The cloth is placed slightly different but that might have happened also by the wind or so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          There could be very specific nuances to each synonym for pants as well, and we could debate what exactly the difference is between briefs and slacks. Jeans is a good example of this, its the exact same style of clothing as other pants, its just made with a very specific textile. If you saw a photo of bleached jeans and white pants, you would have the same complaints that you have with OPs photo, you couldnt tell the difference.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            OK, that’s a valid point that I agree to. But then this guide is not a ‘cool guide’ because it doesn’t give me a clue on what’s the relevant differentiator between the different things. If it’s properties like textile, color etc. and not just the cut, then there should be some kind of indicator, explanatory remark or visualisation of that.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      I like the one resembling a Christmas tree.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      They do; to prevent their identification, smuggle stuff like weapons and conceal their real gender among other stuff.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      No, of course not. that would defy physics as some know it. These are clearly womens clothing and they can only possibly be fit by someone feline of birth. They also don’t feature a penis pocket so not sure where you would fold that all up.

      • Lime Buzz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        TIL AFAB = Assigned Feline At Birth, good to know.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 months ago

    is there one word I can learn that describes all of these because honestly that’s too much to remember

  • @Fah_Q
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Removed by mod

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 months ago

      How the repression cloth hangs on the shoulders is slightly different, probably because of how it wraps around her scandalous hair.

      • @Fah_Q
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Removed by mod

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Purple hangs over the shoulders and might actually be a pull over hood.

          Green is wrapped around, but only goes to the shoulders on the backside,l. Hangs in front.

          Red wraps around and hangs in front but also has a hard too see tiny cape looking drape in the back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      Just guessing but 3 has her shoulders covered and 4 looks like a looser headscarf than 5.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    Never heard of a Chador, looks cozy.

    This drawing kind of makes a Burka look crazy, like she’s blindfolded.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 months ago

    As a man, it is not my place to say anything about this conversation, but I want to give a story form my life. My mother didn’t wear it until my father’s death. So I am sure that it was her choice. She was a praying Muslim and devoted before and after and We live in this so-called authoritarian state too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      Was it truly her choice or was it something society and/or religion and/or culture dictated her to do to fit into a role intented for her? What would be her reason to do this out of free will?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        As far as I know, she wanted to wear it before his death, but he didn’t let her. So when he did, she chose to wear it on her own.

        You need to understand that it is normal not to wear it in our society. infects some people use it to not have to Do their hair when they don’t feel like it.

        In fact, it is getting less and less used as people moderniz. And people in the West get more religious effect from people in Muslim communities I know the fuckers who would go to the club and drink in here, but who will start praying as soon as they get out to western country. So you maybe getting the wrong idea about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Honestly outside of protection from the sun they all look extremely uncomfortable/constraining. Especially the burka.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This clothing’s function is not to protect against the sun but to protect women against men without socialization, rape, comparison and property protection (that means exactly what is it, the women are property of their men and mostly law- and powerless). It is a social instrument of oppression and property and modern social slavery.