• IIII@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    That actively works against the cause because it would do so much harm to the local ecosystems

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      That is a short term problem for trying to fight a long term catastrophe.

      I would prefer to not cause a mess, and further harm natural spaces, but as you can see. Not only are passive demonstrations not effective, they have severe jail time. So at this point, i see it as the most logical step

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well a lot of them run through more or less suburban areas. So doing it there would have lower environmental impact while greatly raising awareness of how many pipelines run through populated places.