• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1212 months ago

    For years I bent over backward to give Thomas the benefit of the doubt. I even researched his jurisprudence especially where it concerned civil rights.

    Turned out I was wasting my time. Motherfucker was just corrupt.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 months ago

        We used to try to think that Supreme Court justices took their lifetime appointments and unique place in our democracy seriously. Turns out, they’re corrupt asshole politicians like all the rest. At least on the Republican side.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        I even researched his jurisprudence especially where it concerned civil rights.

        Because they’re not class conscious and made it a race thing. While completely overlooking Anita Hill’s story.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1162 months ago

    I worked for a city government in sewer automation inspections and I wouldn’t take a coffee from contractors because I wanted it crystal clear who I worked for. We can be friendly but if you go off spec then that’s the end of the conversation.

    How the fuck this was ever allowed is shocking.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      672 months ago

      Conservatives have a very… interesting idea of what morality is, which is more than a bit ironic considering they see themselves as extremely moral and “good” people

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        412 months ago

        When your mindset is that everything you do is good and everything everyone else does is bad, it’s pretty easy to be a good person.

        • Wytch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          222 months ago

          This is it entirely, good people do good things, and they determine if they’re good people by how much they agree with them.

          They have the whole thing backwards; normal people determine if someone is good by the morality of their behavior, and they can’t comprehend this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      302 months ago

      We had a guy from the Navy come to our shop to inspect our product. He wouldn’t even let me go grab him a burger from McDonald’s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        172 months ago

        Was he from the Navy or from the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps? We have had a couple of FDA auditors from the USHSCC and they were former Naval officers working on a second retirement. They were nice enough when you prove you are open but they absolutely will not accept anything but water. Maybe coffee.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          LOL, no, he stopped his inspection and went to McD’s with me and saved a receipt for his cheeseburger.

    • FenrirIII
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We expect scandal and fraud from our elected officials. That’s why they do it so brazenly and in the open. They know the people have no power because the system is rigged; especially if you’re a Republican.

      Edit: Why the downvotes? Tell me where I’m wrong. Our elected officials choose judges, so it’s the same pool of corruption.

      • @aubeynarf
        link
        27
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t expect that, and I don’t let apathy and defeat prevent me from participating in the process.

        I usually hear “everyone is corrupt” from the people who’s “guy” happens to have been found to be corrupt.

        Kind of like saying “everyone steals office supplies” or “everyone cheats on their wife” - says a lot about one’s character.

        • FenrirIII
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          I am well aware. But who selects those judges? Who is supposed to check and balance those judges? OMG, it’s our elected officials! You’re not contributing and just making asinine comments.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 months ago

            I guess but we’re literally talking about the judges specifically in this thread who currently have lifetime appointments and no enforceable ethics code sooo

            • FenrirIII
              link
              fedilink
              42 months ago

              You’re almost getting it! And why is there no enforced ethics code? Because our ELECTED OFFICIALS refuse to make one!

        • FenrirIII
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          The system is rigged by and for Republicans. We’ve repeatedly seen them break the rules, ethics, and the law with no repercussions. They have destroyed, from the inside, the checks and balances that governed elected officials. Look at Trump for the shining star of open corruption with full court Republican deflection.

    • Sabata
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      I had a job fixing state owned equipment and I was hesitant to take a damn bottle of water offered on a hot day case someone thought it was a bribe.

  • toomanypancakes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 months ago

    I hope they can get some reforms through, take some power away from the Republicans who own justices. I don’t have a lot of hope, but maybe this time there’s cause for some?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      432 months ago

      There will be no reforms before the election, for sure. The Republicans control the House and will not allow any. They like it this way.

      After the election? Well, if Harris wins and we can give the Democrats control of the House and keep the Senate, then maybe? But without 50 seats in the Senate, they won’t be able to get anything through unless they do away with the filibuster.

      • Icalasari
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        It’s what has me iffy on them threatening civil war. On the one hand, I don’t want to see people die. On the other hand, if it happens and is swiftly put down, then it won’t matter what the states who participated on the losing side say - That’s flat out treason, so they would HAVE to capitulate to the terms of the winners with said terms at least including, “Every politician that was for it being removed, banned from politics, thrown in jail, and lots of reform done to prevent these fucks from ever being able to lock up the political process again”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    532 months ago

    i feel like “reform” isn’t strong enough of a word for what needs to be done with the supreme court. “fucking overhaul” sounds closer

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      272 months ago

      It needs “reform” as in it needs to be completely dismantled and re-formed with all new justices.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        with term limits. i don’t know if i’ll ever forgive RBG, no matter how much respect i had

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            82 months ago

            Mandatory retirement age for all public officials would be nice. Tag it to mean life expectancy, -10 years.

            It would incentivize politicians to take care of the population in the long term.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              42 months ago

              I do especially like the idea of basing it on average life expectancy; if they want to hold on to power, they’ll have to try and make people live longer. Biggest bang for their buck will be universal healthcare

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Funny, because to me the meaning of reform can be as serious as using the guillotine.
      Reform is when minor adjustments and changes are not enough. Reform is a complete overhaul.