A judgment was entered Friday in favor of Jonathan Guessford, 54, who said in the lawsuit that police unlawfully prevented him from engaging in peaceful protest by standing on the roadside and holding up a small cardboard sign reading “Radar Ahead!”
    After Guessford raised a middle finger at troopers while driving away from an initial encounter, he was stopped and cited for “improper use of a hand signal.” The charge was later dropped.
    The episode on March 11, 2022, was captured on cell phone videos taken by Guessford and included in his complaint, as well as on dashboard cameras in the vehicles of Corporal Stephen Douglas, Trooper Nicholas Gallo and Master Corporal Raiford Box.
    Police dashcam audio captures the troopers laughing and giggling at the notion of citing Guessford for using an improper hand turn signal because of the obscene gesture. “He wasn’t making a turn,” Douglas says.
    The cell phone video shows troopers approaching Guessford, who was standing in a grassy area next to the shoulder of Route 13 north of Dover. Douglas told Guessford that he was “disrupting traffic,” while Gallo, based on a witness report, said Guessford was “jumping into traffic.”
    “You are a liar,” Guessford told Gallo. “I’m on the side of the road, legally parked, with a sign which is protected by the First Amendment,” he told troopers.
    Dascham video shows Douglas twice lunging at Guessford to prevent him from raising his sign. Gallo then ripped it from his hands and tore it up.
    “Could you stop playing in traffic now?” Gallo sarcastically asked Guessford.
    As Guessford drove away, he made an obscene hand gesture at the troopers. Dashcam video shows Douglas racing after him at speeds of more than 100 miles per hour (160 kilometers per hour) in a 55 mph zone, followed closely by Gallo and Box.
    “Is there a reason why you were doing that?” Douglas asked Guessford after he pulled him over.
    Box told Guessford he was engaging in “disorderly conduct” and opened the front passenger door of Guessford’s vehicle.
    “Take it to court. That’s what I want you to do,” Box replied after Guessford told troopers he was going to take legal action. Box also threatened to charge Guessford with resisting arrest.
    “We’re going to take you in. We’re going to tow the car, and we’ll call social services for the kid,” Box said, referring to Guessford’s young son, who was with Guessford and witnessed his profanity-laden tirade against the officers. “It’s not a threat, it’s a promise,” Box added.
    Box’s dashcam audio also captures his subsequent phone call with a supervisor, Lt. Christopher Popp, in which Box acknowledges that citing Guessford for his hand gesture is “pushing it.”
    “You can’t do that,” Popp tells Box. “That will be dropped.”
    “Yeah, it’s gonna get dropped,” Box replies. “I told (Douglas) it’s definitely going to get thrown out. … I said, ‘Ah, that’s not really going to fly, buddy.’”
    Douglas is heard saying that even if the charge would be dropped, it at least “inconvenienced” Guessford.

    Notice, there’s no penalty at all for the laughing cops and their gently scolding supervisor, Lt. Christopher Popp.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 year ago

    Threatening to have his kid taken away and the other officers letting him arrest Guessford even though they know Guessford did nothing wrong. In fact the cops destroyed Guessford’s property.

    Horrible.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      Yeah sounds like compensation is the least of what should be happening, those officers should be severely reprimanded.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 year ago

        This type of deliberate violation of civil rights ought to result in being instantly fired and permanently blacklisted from ever being a police officer again, in any jurisdiction anywhere.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If by severely reprimanded you mean spend a couple years in prison for deprivation of rights under color of law, I’d agree.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    Seriously fuck cops. Look at all the bullshit they tried pulling here and would have gotten away if not for cell phone videos.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    “improper use of a hang signal”

    🤣🤣🤣🖕 absolutely the proper use of a hand signal, get fucked piggy!

  • kitonthenet
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    Hope these guys one day do 100mph into the side of a dump truck 🙏

    • PrunesMakeYouPoop
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      No, that would hurt the dump truck and possibly hurt the dump truck driver. In this instance, it would be better if they crashed into something that would not hurt someone innocent or their property.