• Firestorm Druid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    913 months ago

    Just disregard the hundreds of thousands of people who died in those bombings. It’s not as bad as you think. What doesn’t kill you makes you- wait

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      173 months ago

      Fat man was the “big” one and it was 22 kiloton yield…

      A modern ICBM from American subs is 455 kilotons, Russian icbms (if they work) are around 800 kilotons.

      There are zero scenarios where just a single ICBM is launched, but even if America just launched one and no one else retaliated…

      That’s well over 10x what was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

      These idiots think a M80 is the same as a stick of dynamite…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      Elon repeatedly said he’s fine with sacrifices made for the sake of progress. It’s just that he thinks others should be doing sacrifices and he should be the guy doing progress. Very convenient for a narcissistic manbaby.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      The death toll of other people isn’t relevant to them. What’s important to Elon is that if Elon wanted he could go to either city and have a wonderful time, and therefore no harm, no foul. All that matters to Elon is what Elon thinks and feels, there is no larger world beyond what he directly interacts with.

    • androogee (they/she)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      And the guy replied, “yeah but those were all owned by Jeffrey Epstein and his buddies. I was hoping for some transportation not piloted by a rapist.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        and God said, “listen to me you little shit, you should’ve thought of that before you went on that island”

  • Kalcifer
    link
    fedilink
    353 months ago

    This post appears to show that they’re arguing that nuclear bombs “aren’t that bad”, as it’s missing the important context that they’re actually talking about the safety of nuclear power — or, rather, they’re arguing that nuclear power isn’t as dangerous as people might think — by using the lingering radiation from the nuclear bombings as an example.

    I want to be clear that I’m not arguing that their argument is sound, but this post is bordering on disinformation.

      • optional
        link
        fedilink
        153 months ago

        I live thousand miles and almost 40 years away from the Chernobyl disaster. And still we have to test and dispose boar meat regularly because of over the top Caesium-137 polution.

      • Kalcifer
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        ok… so that just shows they’re idiots.

        And if that’s the case, one should explain why that is rather than trying to twist the truth to fit a narrative.

        there was not much radiation because most of it was scattered EVERYWHERE. and the radioactive material was very shortlived. Chernobyl is still very hot, especially in the immediate surrounding areas and nothing like after being nuked as the radioactive material left behind is very long lived

        I agree.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      Ah yes “Nuclear power is good because Hiroshima really wasn’t that bad” Stable genius take right there

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Perhaps he meant that it’s not as bad as some people think that nuclear bombs make areas uninhabitable for 1000 of years. I think a lot of people probably think that. Disregarding injuries and death

    • @radiohead37
      link
      183 months ago

      Sorry, no matter how you look at it, it is a stupid comment from Musk.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      If that’s what he meant he should have phrased it that way. Otherwise, even if we assume what you wrote is true, he sounds like a person insensitive to mass murder.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      It’s also ignoring 80 years of advancement from literally the first nuclear bombs…

      A modern one would make an area uninhabitable for centuries and spread radiation around the majority of the planet. And the destructive force of the blast would flatten like 10x the area.