• fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fascists always vote = fascists get what they want = idiots saying “voting doesn’t work”

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This comment is the perfect example of why fascism has a habit of winning. Laziness from the populace. One election in one office is all you’re willing to commit. We voted one time in one election, why wasn’t that enough? One office wasn’t run by a fascist and that’s got to do it for the entire country for the rest of all time I guess. One vote is all you’re willing to commit. People who don’t understand fight against fascism is a lifetime of work are the people who deserve fascism. Beating fascism is about building a strong Democratic populace. About building a system and a society that respects the Democratic process. It takes decades and it has to be renewed constantly. Also wouldn’t be a bad idea to just go around hanging fascist every 30 or 50 years or so either, that’s also an option.

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          People don’t want to hear that! Sheesh!

          But really. Some people think voting and protesting is the epitome off not being lazy about about it, but it’s the bare minimum.

          You think ACAB? Be a cop and be the exception. You think the problem is higher up? Get involved in politics. You think it’s corporate? Get involved with ethical companies, and shun unethical ones.

          You think you shouldn’t have to? That’s because you’ve gotten lazy. There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with that, it’s just easy to take advantage of - and if you don’t like the results of the laziness, eventually you’ll like them so little you’ll have to do something or die - and you’ll probably get motivated at that point.

            • bastion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s a very psychologically weak take, and comes from the privilege of not having to take up these matters into your own hands, because our society had enough flexibility that you haven’t had to. …but that kind of weakness is pretty common these days, because people don’t have a lot to live for.

              Regardless of whether you have a lot of power, personally, or whether you don’t have a lot of power, spending what you do have ethically and prudently matters a lot. Although many may not be able to make things better on their own, many have enough power that they will regret inaction later, when action becomes absolutely necessary, and no real preparation has been made.

              In short: Call it privilege all you like, see where that gets you.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          its like you ignored his comment and responded to something else entirely. weird stuff.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            I didn’t say you said it I said you were an example of it. Hell you just did it again, every 4 years you say. Exactly the issue. You people think it’s a one-time game. It’s not , it’s constant. It’s every Congressional race it’s every senate race it’s every state race it’s every School Board Race. The fight is unending. Also yeah some people deserve fascism, they’re called the people that sit on their ass and let it overwhelm them. People that aren’t willing to fight it are the ones who deserve it. Cuz they’re the ones that enable it more than anyone else.

            I agree it takes groundwork, what kind of ground work is my question though. Real groundwork? The kind of groundwork that endorses democracy and respect for democracy? The kind of ground work that keeps progressively moving us away from fascism step by step? Yeah that’s the kind of ground work we need. That’s the kind of ground work you’re sitting here arguing against. Your groundwork is vote one time in one election and then turn your nose up at the entire process and sabotage anyone who wants to keep fighting. You all or nothing people are the problem. When you’re steering a nation it takes a long time for the rudder to move. It takes constant pressure to change course. That course change is going to take years and maybe even decades but you have to keep pushing on the rudder. If you never try you go where you were headed in the first place. That’s what your endorsing here. One brief nudge and then sitting on your ass. Doesn’t move anything.

              • njm1314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                How do you define Direct? I’m open to a very wide range of it whether it’s from going door to door all the way through throwing bombs into the carriage of a tsar. Action’s fantastic particularly at local level, in fact primarily at the local level. Up to and including Carriage routes.

              • bastion@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                If you’re capable of implementing a structure that can actually stand, direct action may be warranted. If not, then not, unless violent anarchy is better.

                Start small. Build your structure and run some group that way. …and expand.

    • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      pretty sure it;'s not the voting.

      pretty sure it’s everything OTHER than the voting that gets them what they want. and the liberals refusing to let anyone stop them.

      you’ll notice that even when a fascist loses an election, like in 2000, they still get their guy in office sometimes.

        • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          or the fascists lose electoralism, and get the office anyway, because the left isn’t big enough to fight them and the libs are happy to just let them.

          and yeah the weird gaslighting ratchet effect ‘im going to do the exact same thing the last guy did but libs are going to yell at you for not sucking my dick about it now’ is not cool

          also, you know, when they do riots to get their way. sometimes in an election.

    • Semjaza
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They might, but I mostly know them as nutters out on the streets protesting or kicking up a fuss.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    Socialists do nothing -> Fascists receive no consequences -> Socialists do nothing -> Fascists seize power -> Socialists join the fascists and say it’s all the fault of the liberals.

    Complain all you want about the liberals voting to prevent fascists from getting power, but they’re doing something while socialists do nothing except complain.

    I’ll let you in on a little secret, many liberals are socialists that got tired of doing nothing. Voting in many successive elections to get the change you want over many decades is far more admirable than sitting on the sidelines complaining about the people that are making an effort.

    • schloppah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is where I’m at, admittedly. I see no substantial action from any alternative group. I can’t be the change I want to see because I’m not a leader. So given the options I have to choose one of them. I finally get the “lesser evil” shit. I used to think it was a cynical slogan meant to get people used to the idea of supporting heinous crimes, which it is, but it is also a genuine sentiment that holds some weight. I was blind to that before. The way I see it now, no matter my choice, evil will come, so I might as well cast my ballot for the one that is a ostensibly less evil. So I’ll begrudgingly vote for Harris because the rhetoric coming from the republicans is fucking terrifying, and JD Vance especially makes me feel very nervous. He’s exactly the type of slimy opportunistic creep that should be kept as far away from power as possible. At least it’s not Biden or Shapiro. C’est la vie.

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah. Mainly, find ways, wherever you are, to do right with the small amount of power you have. It matters.

        Some of that is voting. Some of that is whatever political support you can manage. Some of it is just saying “that seems like a bad idea” when you’re in a meeting, or choosing a more ethical supplier if you’re at some company.

        Always know that, no matter how small the power you hold seems, it matters.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          every day make the best choices you can with the energy you have available. you may or may not win; you may or may not even make a difference; one day you may just need a fucking cheeseburger from macdonalds despite your usual moral misgivings… and that’s fine!

          make choices to change the system, sure, but be aware of the direction you want and head in that direction… change is proactive; participants make the rules

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, but simply not voting isn’t a solution. It’s a self-congratulatory exercise in washing your hands of responsibility. We all see this is the problem. It’s been the problem our entire lives. It’s clear as day for anyone with half a brain. So…what then?

  • geogle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    Limitations of action from either side are entirely due to a lack of a strong majority in Congress. Without it, no matter the goals, the capabilities are limited. There are times I do really appreciate some of the checks congress has over the executive.

    • StopJoiningWars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      It really really isn’t when there are no consequences for filibustering and only one party does it. They can chokehold any decision indefinitely. I’m not even American and yet I know this, must be nice being that gullible and naive.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Oh, so you’d rather the fascist win?” I say, as I’m being dragged from the voting booth into the gas chamber.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    Pretty sure the "hold liberals accountable " falls under the “do nothing about fascists” banner

  • artemisRiverborne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    This might have been a pattern before but the new dem party seems to be hitting harder and faster than in the past. Plus it’s hard to make change when ur not willing to do shady shit and ignore the essence of democracy and constitution

    • Gimpydude
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      I do not disagree, but let’s see if they can keep it together after January.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ummm akshurally it’s called Fascism Lite™ and it’s totally different then Fascism, vote harder or you’re a Russian bot 🤓

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago
    1. There are two choices in the United States 2024 election. No third party stands a ghost of a chance of winning. No, not even if the 30,000 people you can reach on Lemmy all vote for Timothy Greenparty.
    2. A Trump victory in 2024 would not only be just as bad if not worse for the citizens of Gaza than Harris would, but also pose an existential threat to a large number of vulnerable Americans (trans people, immigrants, women seeking abortions).
    3. Given the margins of victory in 2016 and 2020, Kamala might not win if leftists don’t vote for her.
    4. Snoozing fascism for four years is better than inviting it through the door now, and buys us time to build our defenses for when it comes back.

    I’d like to focus my counterargument. Which of these statements do you disagree with?