cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/19720479

“I have spent my career inviting diversity of opinion. I think it’s important to have people at the table when some of the most important decisions are being made that have different views, different experiences,” Harris said. “And I think it would be to the benefit of the American public to have a member of my Cabinet who was a Republican.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    673 months ago

    Do not give those extremist fuckers an inch.

    How about maybe appointing a leftist, socialist, or communist?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    363 months ago

    If she can find an actual Republican and not a Magat or Libturd then it’s probably not a bad idea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      So while I generally think this is a dumb idea, if it were Adam kinzinger, I think that could potentially be a really sharp choice. It’d definitely be very interesting to see how it played out.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    273 months ago

    Listened to the entire interview. At no point does she pledge that. She simply doesn’t rule it out and is willing to consider.

    That header is clickbait bullshit .

  • finley
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The Chamberlain

    ”MmmMMMMMMmmmm!”

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    143 months ago

    She will. Democrats always inexplicably rule as conservatives, so this would track well with recent history.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    Not sure this is really Onion material. Diversity of thought is very important. If elected a cabinet of yes men might do her some harm. Even one dissenting voice can at least demonstrate how non partymembers might react to her plans. Allowing her to cater them to better appeal to a larger amount of the nation’s people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      273 months ago

      Diversity of thought is very important

      So she’s going to appoint a Democratic Socialist? No? Someone from Sunrise then? No? A Palestinian-American Democrat? They couldn’t even get 2 minutes at the convention. How about a BLM activist? She marched for that cause, surely that’s some diversity she’d want to have represented. Not that either? Hm.

      Maybe this isn’t about diversity of thought and instead about the doomed Democratic instinct to try to coopt the center-right, which according to the theory of centrism will make them win forever! Just not any of the times they’ve already tried it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 months ago

        If she marched for the cause of BLM adding another person from that group wouldn’t add a novel view point if that is already one of her own. As for the other groups you mentioned I think that they would be good additions. A homogeneous cabinet is pointless.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          113 months ago

          I didn’t ask whether you thought they were diverse, I asked whether you thought they would ever be given the same consideration in the name of “diversity of thought”. We both know they won’t.

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      213 months ago

      Diversity of thought is very important.

      Sure, Jan.

      Putting a fascist in a position of power creates diversity of thought in the same way that polluting a river adds flavor to drinking water.

      We can have diversity of thought without indulging fascists. Germany’s been doing it for almost a century now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        83 months ago

        Cabinet positions are advisory and have little actually power. And not everyone “who was a Republican” is a fascist.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            63 months ago

            Perhaps my bolding and italics wasn’t enough. Was is in the past tense. As in not currently.

            • FlashMobOfOne
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I have bad eye sight, so yes, it wasn’t, but that’s not your fault. Thanks for clarifying.

              The downvoters can eat a dick.

              Also it’s a sad fact that a lot of people here in the US think we can’t have true freedom of speech if we don’t let Nazis and fascists get equal air time.

  • @Anyolduser
    link
    English
    93 months ago

    Holy fuck, that’s a good move.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        He barely got elected to his first term. He didn’t even get a majority of the popular vote, just more than his opponent. He only beat the shit out of “Crime, boy, I dunno” for his second term.

    • finley
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      As someone stress binging through the West Wing, I approve this comment