• Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think the implication is that the things you do with those natural features form a culture. Fireflies aren’t culture, but catching them is. And besides, there are plenty more examples of culture in the post. But you are correct.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I reject the idea that something that originated in one society cannot become another society’s culture. It morphs and changes, and is reinforced by the society until it becomes a part of their culture, too. Surely you would not say that tomato-based foods aren’t part of Italian culture just because they came from the new world?

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Does culture have to be original?

            Also, having looked into the trick or treating thing a bit: Canada invented the phrase “trick or treat”, and America has variations such as trunk-or-treating. Modern trick or treating doesn’t involve performing at the door. Some of these innovations (ie. the phrase “trick or treat”) have even propagated back to the originating countries. I think a binary view on this is too restrictive and unrepresentative of the reality of the situation. The tradition is still very similar to what it was, yes, but it changes over time.