• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    643 months ago

    Suicide rates in Greenland are among the highest on the planet. It may seem idyllic but it’s apparently crushingly lonely and oppressive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      273 months ago

      seasonal affective depression… if you are going to move somewhere remote, move into a desert or rainforest (i.e. near the equator), not places like Canada, Alaska, Siberia, or indeed Greenland

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          Climate change doesn’t change how much the sun shines. Where I live it has been getting noticeably warmer during my lifetime especially in the colder months, but this hasn’t changed that it’s dark in those months.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Right, but in 20 years, the dark places will be hot in the summer, but the sunny places will be dangerous much of the year.

            Arizona already has real problems, water, asphalt melting or burning people, more heat stroke.

            SAD sucks, but if you can get outside most days and treat it with meds if needed, moving away from desert is gone be necessary in the not too distant future.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            seasonal affective depression

            I’m just saying that not everyone is affected by it. I’d say most people are just fine. For example, in Finland that rate is 10–30% who get some symptoms without the depression. For the SAD overall, I found this

            In Greenland, the northernmost territory of North America, the frequency of SAD has been found to vary from 6.9 to 11.5%, and highest in northern municipalities

            So you could move to Greenland and be totally fine. Though I guess where you are coming from can affect it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    473 months ago

    Nuuk is fairly remote, but it’s literally the capital and I’ve heard it’s developing nicely.

    Imagine moving much farther north to Illorsuit, it was literally abandoned a few years ago.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        193 months ago

        Are HOAs even a thing outside of the US ? I know I’ve never seen that concept here in Canada at least.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            It’s certainly a thing for owning apartments in a multi-apartment building. We call it Eigentümerversammlung and I hear they’re quite the hassle to deal with, too. Kind of hard to avoid having to have, though

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                For apartment buildings, yes, because you have shared private infrastructure that you need to make shared decisions about. For detached houses I don’t really get the point.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  To steel man HOA’s, they take care of common property in a similar way to condos. Anything from street lights, to the sign at the front of the cul du sac, to the playground that seems oh so much nicer than what the city ever puts in. Some even provide garbage service and maintain the streets. Municipalities have been happy to offload this burden.

                  Steel man off: their point is to keep black people out. The superficial niceness is so white people can say how great things work for them, even when they’re only one layoff away from losing it all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          Yes it is, it’s just not as crazy, but it exists everywhere.

          If several houses share a private road, it will be necessary to make an agreement with all the homeowners on maintaining the road.

          Similarly with privately owned apartments. If they need new windows, it’s generally in everybody’s interest that the entirety of homeowners agree on the colour of windows.

          There are usually some sort of home owners association anywhere where homeowners own part of the common areas.

          It’s still possible to buy a house without one, but many new build suburban sprawl have them by default because the placement off public roads and the developers wanting to have everything look at a certain standard before the houses are sold to individuals.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              23 months ago

              It definitely exists in Canada. Mostly in condos, where it makes sense.

              The issue in USA is that they have many more gated communities where the HOAs have way too much power to “manage” the community.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    213 months ago

    I’m sure they’d love to have random immigrants who moved there just because it looked nice on online photos

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If it’s only a few people? Who cares. I wouldn’t. You want to occasionally get some new blood in your community.

      If hundreds of people start moving there, it’s gonna turn to shit eventually.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        Even a few people might be sign of it starting to snowball (heh) so might make the people there upset.

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    163 months ago

    Idk about greenland but in faroe and iceland a surprising amount of people are moving in because its a very calm place. The birth rate is also good(at least on iceland, idk about faroe) so the population is actually growing pretty steadily.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It won’t be calm for long with all those toddlers running around, climbing things and getting into a ruckus

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      I visited Faroe. Absolutely love the place. Everyone is so kind and nice. The landscape is otherworldly. I would absolutely go back and visit again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    153 months ago

    Remote can exist practically anywhere.

    My in-laws retired and moved to France, in the rural south. It is eerily quiet because no traffic goes near their house, and they are 30 mins drive from anything like civilization. They do have a small restaurant (that loves putting froe grais on everything), a hairdressers, a travelling doctor, and (weirdly) a bowling alley that doubles up as the local bar and a place to buy stuff - all for less than a hundred people.

    You can get really remote in the UK too. Some parts of England are 30 mins from anything like civilization. Some parts of Scotland are only accessible once a day by boat, and if you go really up north you find wooded areas where people die because you’re surrounded by miles of nondescript woodland.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Live in Estonia. Went on a bicycle trek once. “Hmm, I’ve barely seen any cars today. Like even on asphalt roads.”

      Second biggest city in Estonia was 25 km away. It wasn’t even a remote location and there was just nobody around

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    103 months ago

    Googling it, there’s an e-reader, New Nook, Nook’n go, Tom Nook in animal crossing, a milk farm in Peterborough… but yeah, the city exists.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    I’ve always had an obsession with maps, which as an adult has brought me to wanting to visit the “extremes” of the world. Far north, far south points of things. But I’m not the adventurous type so a lot of those places are just never going to happen. Nuuk has always been high on my list of places that would be neat, while not being impossible to get to comfortably.