• Owl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 months ago

    Reptile ? You mean dino

    • NegativeNullOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles, and therefore birds are reptiles

      • Owl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 months ago

        If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles

        ?

        • NegativeNullOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Birds are a clade of dinosaurs ( a child group). In exactly the same way, dinosaurs are a clade of reptiles. So by extension, birds are a clade of reptiles.

          You and I are also walking fish.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 months ago

            I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable.

            • NegativeNullOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles

              I’m not sure what is structurally wrong with that statement. Birds are dinosaurs (most people know this by now). Using the exact same logic, dinosaurs are reptiles as well.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                9
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                a= “birds are dinos”

                b= “dinos are reptiles”

                c= “birds are reptiles”

                Structure: If a then b, therefore c

                a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be “because birds are reptiles”)

                You’ve basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles

                • NegativeNullOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  32 months ago

                  I see. Thank you you for that explanation. I was letting inference do some heavy lifting. (and yes, I’m not a great communicator)

          • @leftzero
            link
            English
            32 months ago

            There’s no such thing as a fish.

    • @RamblingPanda
      link
      English
      102 months ago

      You can’t evolve out of a clade ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        • @RamblingPanda
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          Clint’s Reptiles told me that. I love this YouTube channel and his energy and love for all animals.

          Not affiliated, just a fan 😅

        • @RamblingPanda
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          The ancestors of birds were reptiles. No matter how different they are from their ancestors, they’re still reptiles. They’re birds as well, but being different doesn’t mean they left the clade.

  • @RamblingPanda
    link
    English
    52 months ago

    And it’s not the original penguin ™️