• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1622 months ago

    I am allways fascinated by people who just have to do things that will cause them a lot of problems.

    I get that they lack empathy, that much is clear, but where is their sense of self preservation?

    Part of me is envious that they have so few problems that they deliberately make more for themselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      642 months ago

      What, you’re trying to tell us that you were never so comfortable with your station in life that you uh… printed off scrabble tiles to make matching necklaces that spell out a racial slur as a teen??? Geeze what a tragically empty life you must have had.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        Compared to others, my teens were what they would call empty, but I had a good and calm time in my teens.

        • GooglyBoobs
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 months ago

          I did some things as a teen that would absolutely humiliate me today if blasted on the internet. I even bullied people as a teen, so we’re talking real dirtbag stuff.

          Still. I never was even slightly tempted to take a pic with friends and a slur around my neck, so I guess I have that going for me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      I used to be a reckless teen. I just didn’t use my foresight. The payoff of doing the joke/dangerous thing is more worth it than self preservation when you’re a dumb kid.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      where is their sense of self preservation?

      They’re high schoolers, it hasn’t developed yet lol.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      They have been openly racist for a long time, and it has never mattered. Now that their racism is on the news, this is first time it has had consequences. So they never felt there was any self preservation to take into consideration.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1152 months ago

    Oklahoma the prototypical red state shithole.

    Where if the black community becomes peacefully prosperous, it’s too much for the numerous white inferiority-complex shitkickers to take, they boil and fester like an infection until one night they swarm like a biblical plague of locusts to burn and raze the black community to the ground.

    Hollow and ignorant, lazy and angry white madness is synonymous with republican-voting states.

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      Most of my experience in Oklahoma was in Norman, a fantastic college town. When I would go outside of the Norman/Moore/OKC area to visit the families of my fellow students, it was surprising how much and how quickly things changed.

      I mean, I know the dichotomy between rural and urban is everywhere in this nation, but it seemed more stark somehow.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    542 months ago

    My high school from a red state was like 99% white and also 99% conservative and had this attitude of racism is bad but also racism doesn’t exist anymore then proceeds to make racist jokes and support racist politics (including students who were very academically focused), although it never evolved to anything as stupid as taking a group photo holding up a racial slur. There was a lot of stuff from there though that seemed normal at the time then after I left realized how fucked it was, and I know of other people who think the same thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      although it never evolved to anything as stupid as taking a group photo holding up a racial slur

      The fundamental difference between the Conservative Citizens Councils and the Klu Klux Klan was the veneer of political correctness the former utilized to make the violence they doled out via the police appear legitimate.

      There was a lot of stuff from there though that seemed normal at the time then after I left realized how fucked it was, and I know of other people who think the same thing.

      Lots of code words and turns of phrase, intended to alienate certain kinds of people and entitle others. Dog whistles are very popular in conservative communities.

      We recently had a high school marching band get selected to perform at the Sugar Bowl in New Orleans. After the students raised $15k to pay for the trip, the Superintendent shut it down on the grounds that “New Orleans isn’t a safe place for teenagers”. Why was our city safe but the majority African American city dangerous? Who can say?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        The main problem at my high school was that people, both students and faculty, were constantly parroting shit they heard from Fox News (which is constantly promoting stuff under a racist agenda) and weren’t in an environment that made them think about how their actions impact other people (which means the education system obviously failed at its job), so they would believe stuff like actual racism doesn’t exist anymore and black people are oppressing white people and speech doesn’t hurt anybody, and the extreme lack of diversity didn’t help either. However, if you were to have a serious conversation with them most of them would say that racism is bad, so I think that if people actually had an understanding of the world beyond Fox News propaganda a lot of the edgy racist stuff would die off. With queerphobia there was the opposite problem, where people would bring up queer stuff in jokes to look edgy but in a serious context they would say that queerness is morally wrong.

      • BuckyVanBuren
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Ku Klu Klan.

        Alliteration is fun but in this case it lessen the quality of your comment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        I want to go in New Orleans someday to see the hometown of Suicideboys and get to know the people there…

        It looks so interesting culturally and socially

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    46
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Imagine this photo popping up whenever any one of these idiots tries to get a job.

    That long haired kid looks like he means it the most

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      262 months ago

      Not to defend racists or imply this is acceptable in any way but everybody does stupid shit when they’re a teenager and something like this shouldn’t haunt them for the rest of their working lives provided they mature into well-adjusted adults.

      The bigger problem is the poorly-adjusted adults in the communities that raise these kids and teach them to be hateful towards people with harmless differences.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        282 months ago

        The letters they are holding were provided by the school for some kind of event. It seems like these kids thought they could be funny by spelling out a no no word. To any rational thinking human, this isn’t funny, but teenagers aren’t rational think humans. That’s pretty much the definition of puberty.

        But it’s 2024 and kids post everything online, so now it’s gone viral and everyone judges them as racist scum that deserve to never get a job in their lives. Off of a single photo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      That long haired kid looks like he means it the most

      You mean the kid with dreadlocks? Lol

  • JaggedRobotPubes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    442 months ago

    Guys it was a mixup. They meant to say GINGER.

    Filthy, disgusting, subhuman gingers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    372 months ago

    Guy 1 and 3 fucked up big time, now their display of love for Christmas spices is ruined. What were they thinking

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      252 months ago

      Oh I absolutely see how it happened. It’s rooted in that love of “Technically correct.” I can absolutely see one of them saying “All I did was have a picture of a scrabble tile with the letter G on it. Is having a single scrabble tile illegal? You can’t simply keep us from associating with each other, the first amendment protects the right to peaceably assemble!” All the while they know very obviously what they did, it’s just that they thought they could technically get away with it. They figured that if no one of them openly used the whole word, they couldn’t possibly face any consequences.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        202 months ago

        I was definitely a dumb high school student. At no point did I think it was ever ok to use the n-word though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Sure, but did you grow up in a community with a healthy population of minorities? If so, then you probably don’t really have the same experience as these kids.

          When you don’t actually know anyone a slur references, it’s pretty easy to not take it seriously. A lot of my friends in school make “gay” jokes, until we made friends with a gay kid, at which point we stopped because we suddenly had a personal experience with it. That’s how a lot of these types of things go.

          Edit: not -> so (first paragraph made no sense)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Yes but also racism and homophobia deserve derision and to be laughed and joked about in ways that don’t hurt people. Hear me out. It’s a weird situation because the people who are offended by it deserve to be and are valid but so are the people that say stuff like “telling people that you can’t say that word gives it power” because it absolutely does.

            It’s why myself and my gay partner will jokingly use slurs in private. Because it’s funny and we’re mocking the people that hate us. And by using their words as a joke, we take the sting out of them. Because it’s absurd theyre used seriously in the first place.

            So we exist in this weird spot where we’ve said “yes the gays can reclaim their slurs. And yes the minorities can reclaim their words. But no one else can say them” and it’s like sure but then other people aren’t able to properly take the sting out of the words.

            Not saying there’s a right answer, I’m just saying that we have weird standards that may not be serving our goals.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              If your goal is to make yourself and your partner feel better than I think that makes sense. The other poster is talking about how to effect change in people like those in this picture though, which requires a different approach.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                That’s sort of what I was getting at. Obviously we shouldn’t be using those words in public if they’re going to hurt people, but it almost seems like we’ve regressed and given slurs more power by not saying them as jokes like I do at home occasionally. Specifically the word in the photo is a huge no no and for good reason but it’s power isn’t decaying is the point.

                So the question I’m poking at is: how do you get rid of the power of slurs without offending people? It seems impossible because I almost think that as a community we should all be able to share in reclaiming language to some extent. Otherwise it can divide us.

                Last thing, the word here in this photo is something that is often fine for black people to say but not others. Again I get why. But doesn’t that inherently enforce a divide? Like sorry I actually cannot share in your reclamation culture because I am racially barred from doing so. From my perspective (which could be wrong) I’d rather let people and friends outside my community use those words with me in a casual and inoffensive manner than dividing us by enforcing language rules against them. Just a thought.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  I’d rather let people and friends outside my community use those words with me in a casual and inoffensive manner than dividing us by enforcing language rules against them

                  If that’s what you want, tell them. If you came to me and asked me to use certain slurs with you in a joking way, I’d try my best to do so, but only in private and only with you. It would probably take me some time to get over my barrier to using them, but it’s something I’m willing to do if a friend asks.

                  But that’s not going to really help the next person. Slurs only have power because we give them power. The solution here isn’t to normalize using particular words, the solution is to educate people about the people who those slurs target. I live in a very conservative area and have very conservative parents, and my neighbors and parents have both softened their anti-homosexual stance due to actually meeting and interacting with LGBT people. In fact, there’s a trans woman at my library, and she seems to be very accepted. This works because people are exposed to real people and understand that using those slurs hurts real people.

                  Normalizing the terms won’t do anything, bigots will just come up with new slurs. The real solution is greater exposure so people can get past the discomfort and arrive at understanding. That’s what’s likely missing for the boys in this picture, and it’s what we desperately need if we want more acceptance.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The most compelling case I’ve seen for keeping them is to protect against exploitation and commodification. For example, there’s a long history of AAVE/BVE words and phrases that have been considered vulgar and uneducated until co-opted by white communities. “Woke” is a particularly topical example: A word meant to evoke unity and self-awareness in the black community has been co-opted by (mostly) white conservatives to rally against progressive and inclusive policies. Reclaiming the n-word means using its taboo nature as a shield, saying “this is our word, and you can’t have it.” You can’t go on the campaign trail and complain about n*ggers, but you also can’t forget where it came from and what it meant. It’s a living word that carries its history forward into the modern age so we don’t forget the crimes of the past.

              I’ve likewise seen use of the f-slur as a rebellion against rainbow capitalism. Companies will take pride flags and symbols and words and sell them on t-shirts and use them in commercials. These are things that were all made with intention and symbolism by the queer* community and flown in the face of danger, but companies really don’t give a shit about that because well-meaning people will give them their money to support a cause. Come July first, though, do you see them selling that merch, donating to LGBTQ+ causes, or supporting their queer employees? Of course not, if anything that all gets thrown under the bus for whatever financial issue the company is having. The f-slur is again saying “this is our word, and you can’t have it.” It’s often used jokingly or even affectionately by the queer community, but you’re not going to see it printed on a mass produced shirt or said in an ad. It belongs to them and them only, maintaining the history of its creation and reclamation without being diluted by commodification.

              It’s also important to remember that the words have not lost their sting for many people, especially those who still often hear it said with malice towards the targeted group. We should acknowledge they they are not at a point where they cannot hear the word without those strong, negative feelings, and we can do so by respecting requests not to use it in certain spaces and calling out others who are not as sensitive.

              • As a side note, “queer” is a slur that is slowly working its way back into common parlance. It may be that these other slurs go that way eventually, though it’ll take longer for some of the more severe ones.
              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                I think that’s a fair point. I can definitely see that angle because it does seem that when used within the community it can have an almost positive aspect that can be taken away. Interesting way of thinking about it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                After reading your whole comment I’m left wondering if you had a point at all, none of that needed to be said…

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  32 months ago

                  ??? I was explaining the rationale behind reclaiming slurs while making them still exclusive to the targeted group.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 months ago

        As dumb and as racist as the kids at my high school were, I don’t think any of them even came close to this level.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          Did your high school have a meaningful number of POC? (i.e. more than the token black kid)

          If not, I don’t think your high school experience is directly comparable here. Not having faces to place next to slurs can make the slurs seem funny instead of actually hurtful.

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            It did, actually. I think it was more due to being just a few years before the smart phone craze really took off. I graduated in 2010. It was still extremely common for kids to not have any phone at all or just a very basic phone. We had social media, but not the constant access to HD cameras and ability to post whenever.

            Ironically this probably saved a lot of them from stupid shit. It takes a certain combination of hatred and stupidity to do this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              I honestly don’t know these boys, but I can honestly see this as not involving any form of hatred. I’ve been to a fair amount of small towns, and they really don’t have any kind of conception of what these words actually mean to people. They certainly understand that it’s hurtful, but I think it is closer to curse words (i.e. “taboo” and “edgy”) than an actual intent to cause harm to someone.

              If you see it from that perspective, I think it’s unfair to hold these boys accountable for it for the rest of their lives. It’s a dumb move, but they’ll hopefully get some exposure to POC and change their ways. I would honestly be pretty surprised if these kids actually hate black people, I think they’re just doing it for attention, and this kind of “shock” is an effective way to get attention.

              • JackbyDev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                I think it’s unfair to hold these boys accountable for it for the rest of their lives.

                Not sure where that came from.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  Look at the other comments in this thread, where people seem to be claiming this is unconscionable and that these boys are irredeemable racists, or something like that.

                  I’m explaining that I doubt these boys have the actual life experience needed to appreciate the impact of their actions. That’s all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        I couldn’t imagine doing this though. I’m imagining they somehow expected social benefit for this, and that blows me mind SpongeBob

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          The picture is someone taking a picture of another phone. I haven’t used it in years but it sort of looks like Snapchat. It’s possible they did this thinking it’s merely an edgy joke and sent it to friends on Snapchat rather than being so bold as to directly post it to media.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Nah, I’m pretty sure they were just going for shock factor, that’s it. Kids these age acting out like this are generally just looking for attention.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      802 months ago

      Apologists like you are part of the problem and one big reason why it’s still there.

      This is not an abstract problem of rhetoric. Shit like this is actively hurting people. It normalises hateful speech and behaviour against minorities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 months ago

        I’ve done some pretty stupid stuff as a teenager, because I thought it was funny to upset people. I thought I was being edgy. It never occurred to me that hurting people actually hurt people. I was a teenager, all I cared about was me and my friends.

        I could’ve done this as a teenager, but I would see the error of my ways after it was pointed out to me by the entire school and the news papers and the whole world. I would not be thinking about the Co sequences of my actions before hand. That’s not what teenagers do. That’s what teenagers need to learn, some are just a bit slower in learning that.

        I’m not an apologists. This a hurtful act, a disgrace and it should be punished. All I’m saying is that teenage boys can be stupid like this. If this was done by grown man, it would’ve been pure evil. Now it is a large part stupidity, not less hurtful, just a different origin. If these were grown men, they would be scum. I don’t know these boys, they might be scum already, but maybe they can still change and grow up to be normal, tolerable, non-racist people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          392 months ago

          I’m sorry, nobody taught you that “that hurting people actually hurt people.”

          But that’s just the point. We can’t excuse behaviour like this as “boys will be boys”. Behaviour like this needs to have consequences that actually hurt, not a slap on the wrist, so these kids have a chance to learn.

          If they get away with this with just a “Hey, that’s not okay, don’t do it again. Teenagers haha”, what you actually teaching them, is that it’s not that bad. And they grow up into adults who think hateful language is not that bad.

          Teenagers might have underdeveloped judgment, but thats not necessarily something they learn on their own. Moral judgment isn’t genetic and something that you grow into on your own. Moral standards and judgments are taught by your society and your environment.

          So do me a favour and teach teenagers instead of excusing them with their age.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            122 months ago

            I agree. But I think that this kind of public shaming in a newspaper is already beyond “a slap on the wrist”, but it is not enough on it’s own. However, an actual criminal sentence would be too much, because that would ruin their futures, which would create resentment and that eventual creates actual nazis.

            In the Netherlands we have some form of criminal sentencing for teenagers which gets deleted from your record after you turn 18 or 21 or something. These kids usually get 50 or a 100 hours or so work sentence, like picking garbage or some other tedious manual labour (after school, of course). Maybe it would even be fitting to have them work in some sort of slavery memorial centre or museum. I think such a punishment could be applied here… I don’t know if the US has such an arrangement though or if it’s even legally fitting for this case.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I don’t know where your outcry about newspapers, criminal charges and completely ruined lives comes from.

              What are you defending here?

              This is a Tweet and not a newspaper. It states facts and the reaction from an affected person. Nobody mentioned lifelong consequences. Not even in the comments when I replied to your first comment.
              These boys put this online themselves. That someone shares it should not surprise nor is it a disproportionate consequence.

              You just assumed something and started excusing their behaviour as teenage stupidity.

              I’m not American, but afaik social service hours and the sealing of a juvenile record are a thing there too. I doubt however, that there is any crime committed here, that can be punished in a court of law.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                There’s a partial link to a newspaper article visible in the screenshot.

                This seems to be the full link: https://eu.oklahoman.com/story/news/2024/09/19/tishomingo-oklahoma-students-disciplined-after-racial-slur-shown-in-viral-image/75294249007/

                I am not defending anything, I am merely saying that teenagers are stupid and that eventhough this is racist, it might have been born from stupidity rather than racism, because that’s what teenagers boys often do. It is not an excuse, but a different view point. The reasons matter. A stupid teenager making a stupid mistake is different from a grown adult trying to purposefully hurt people because of some misguided hate or something. And a punishment should be manufactured accordingly.

                I hadn’t read the article before, but it states that the school provided these scrabble letter to all students as some kind of school spirit stunt. Therefor I can imagine that these boys thought it would be funny to spell “nigger”, a spur of the moment thought, not thinking about any consequences. They took a picture, posted it on the Internet, because that’s what teenagers do these days and the rest is history.

                They did put it online and it being shared is therfor an obvious result. I don’t know if it’s a fitting punishment though. Maybe these kids are actual scum and they just enjoy the attention. Maybe these kids aren’t that bad, just immensely stupid and they never intended it to go viral and are regretting their decision now. Maybe that is a fitting punishment. But it’s dangerous if it goes so viral that people with strong opinions decide to take matters in their own hand. The person from the doesn’t seem to be involved with the school(but that’s an assumption on my part). That’s the kind of different viewpoint I wanted to offer. Don’t get too angry over this. This is a problem to be solved by the school, the parents and the people involved, not a national witch Hunt.

                • TheLowestStone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 months ago

                  I am not defending anything

                  Writes 3 paragraphs defending racist teenagers.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                What are you defending here?

                Racism. They’re defending what they perceive as the “right” of racists to be racist without consequence. The excuses they’re making for themselves, and these teens, don’t change that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            10
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The OP didn’t say they should get away with it, they’re just pointing out how idiotic teenage boys are. I think we can all agree that they deserve serious consequences for this, it’s vile. Do they deserve to have their lives ruined?

            Beyond typical teenage stupidity, they learned this behavior from somewhere and that’s usually at home. So I think they don’t bear sole responsibility here. This happened as a result of their environment. The boneheaded teenager says the quiet part out loud to be edgy or whatever. The solution is to punish them, but also take a deeper look into the situation which allowed it in the first place.

            Also, I can tell from that picture that the ringleaders # 1 and 3 are total dickwads.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            02 months ago

            physical harm is obvious, mental harm is not. This is even more true when that harm is distributed over a wide area that you are not near.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          92 months ago

          Soo what can we do about that?

          Talk to the school authorities? That’s what I would do if my kid were being bullied.

          The bullying is the problem here, not the word being used.

          Why can kids taunt with words that are supposed to be off limits?

          They can’t? Bullying is wrong no matter what words you use.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          Because it’s not your place to tell people from a marginalized group how they are allowed to interact with the slurs that have been used against them. Reclaiming words and for once holding the power around the word is their right if they so choose.

          It’s your job as a parent to explain the historical and social context to your children. You have work to do if your child is bothered they can’t call other kids a slur that those children have reclaimed. It does nobody any good to bury our heads in the sand, say persecuted people can’t say it if my privileged child can’t say it, and pretend there’s no complex history there.

          • Iceblade
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            Marginalization is not universal or absolute. You can easily have people who are marginalized in some contexts, and privileged in others.

            An easy example is religion.

            A christian in Spain is probably considered part of the majority and privileged, meanwhile, that same person could be subject to intense persecution in a country like Saudi Arabia because of the same beliefs.


            The same can be applied to this child being bullied by their racist peers.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              It’s not absolute, yes. But we’re not talking about any situation—specifically white and black children using a specific racial slur. One of those belongs to a group that has been (and still is) systematically persecuted with that term connected. The other has not. We’re not seriously going to say that one white kid potentially being bullied is somehow comparable to the history of societal persecution against black people I hope.

              The point I was making is it’s not reasonable to turn one situation of someone being bullied as evidence that black people are not allowed to use the n word if white people can’t. That’s it. I’m really amazed that is somehow controversial.

          • The Pantser
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            My kids should not be punished for things they have never caused and never said. We need to stop punishing for sins of the past.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It isn’t punishing for sins of the past, it’s punishing for sins if the present. If your daughter calls a black classmate a slur today, then that happened today. The reason why it’s bad has to do with a whole lot of history, but it was still said today.

              Nobody is going around suspending students because their great granddaddy used a slur in 1840.

              • The Pantser
                link
                fedilink
                22 months ago

                No my daughter doesn’t say that. The black students taunt her and call her it and say she can’t say it. She is respectful.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  52 months ago

                  How is it taunting if she doesn’t want to say it back? The entirety of her response could be, “Yep.” It wouldn’t be taunting for someone to tell me, “You can’t do nuclear physics.” I would agree with them and be slightly confused why they were apparently out of the blue stating it.

                  If she’s truly being randomly bullied, that’s not going to be solved by telling black people they can’t use that word. A bully would just say something else. This is a rather easy one to deflect.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  42 months ago

                  Then what are you complaining about? A white girl saying “nigger” is disgusting anyway. They might as well taunt her for not being allowed to eat feces. If she’s a decent person she’ll have the same inclination to do that as to say slurs.

  • @Case
    link
    292 months ago

    As a Texan, in a purple area, this doesn’t surprise me from Oklahoma.

    I had the displeasure of driving through OK to get to my late father in law’s hospital bed before he passed.

    I ended up blowing through a toll entry because they didn’t accept paper money or cards. Just coins. I went to the little building to try to pay my way, and it appeared to be abandoned.

    Mother fuckers, I can buy a legal variant of weed with my fucking watch. Coins? Join this century please.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      There’s only two things I hate in this world. People who are intolerant of other people’s cultures and the Dutch.

      -Michael Caine

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 months ago

    Why did they cancel the entire football game and punish the entire school, instead of just disciplining these kids?

    • arefx
      link
      fedilink
      172 months ago

      Schools usually punish the person who gets bullied while protecting the bully so of course they don’t know how to handle this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      Probably out of some sense of getting the rest of the school to learn a lesson, and creating anger at the racists. Probably misguided.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      They might have been forced to forfeit the game for having too few players. There isn’t a game to watch if nobody is playing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    182 months ago

    The punishment fit the crime. Let the picture follow them forever and let their fellow students take out the frustration of losing homecoming on them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    132 months ago

    Because they want to normalize the use of racial slurs yet again, separating it from “real racism”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    I hope someone puts this on a static website with their names so future employers can find it easily

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      292 months ago

      I use to have this way to thinking but then we are encouraging people not to change. This is a group of kids maybe raised wrong maybe thinking it’s okay to joke about so should this ruin the rest of their lives? Should they not be given the chance to do better and learn from this? It’s not murder and nobody was harmed by it. Being offended isn’t traumatizing.

      At what point is the punishment fitting the crime in a case like this. We’ve learned posting this to social media already effects people long term so wouldn’t just posting it here be enough since they may have also been reprimanded by their community.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 months ago

        That’s fair i guess. I did some stupid shit as a kid but I’m also a completely different person than 40 years ago. Otoh i never did anything quite like this. Id hope their eyebrows burn off from the backlash and they learn at least.

        • LeadersAtWork
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          If society has gone a different direction what you did do may have been just as condemnable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            The difference is 40 years ago when i lacked better judgement, i didn’t do things that were condemnable and they still aren’t to this day.

            These kids have done something current date that is condemnable. Maybe they just weren’t raised right and can turn their lives around but it’s not quite the same situation. What they did will always have been bad at the time they did it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            But it didnt and I’m glad because we shouldnt let people be racist. What’s your point here? R u js pulling a “what if some things were worse” cause they are, racism is far from the worst thing u can do today. I’m taking a guess and saying they probs didnt murder anyone as a teen. now I’d hope u could agree that is a step too far that being a dumb kid doesnt justify same deal w racism