This may sound dumb, but I’ve never read for this man. I’ve always just heard about him on social media but never ventured to read his work. Opinions, please. Should I invest? Feeling like fiction lately. I’ve read so much non-fiction through throughout my life that I think I deserve a couple of fiction books to get busy with for a little while. Thanks in advance

EDIT: Thank you so much to all who answered. I have read and appreciated every single comment. I have decided to start with fairy tale since I ran into the book at Walmart. So giving that a shot to see. Thank you so much

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 hours ago

    I can recommend The Shining, Firestarter, and Pet Semetary (no, not cemetery). I think that may be all of his I’ve read.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1119 hours ago

    He wrote under a pen name to prove to himself that his work was valuable and not just selling due to branding. He wrote Running Man under the name Richard Bachman. It was turned into a Schwarzenegger film in the 80s. It’s cheesy (the film), but fun.

    Christine and Carrie should also be good for getting a feel for King. I read Running Man, but not the other two. I just know them from film adaptations. The Stand and It are also worth checking out, I’d think.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      316 hours ago

      Honestly, there are very few adaptations that aren’t cheesy or completely removed from the source material in somewhat major ways.

      Take the Shining. Great film. Great book. The two should not be compared as if they were the same story.

      Dreamcatcher on the other hand, no notes. Perfect in both versions. Especially the fact that the movie kept the shit weasels in.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      318 hours ago

      I’ve actually seen the movie and I loved it. And I did NOT know that Stephen king did sci fi?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      418 hours ago

      I’m already 15% into fairy tale. I really like his style so far. English is my second language and some books are a pain to read because the author feels the need to make it as hard as possible to understand. King uses very simple English and I appreciate that. I’ve only looked up 2 words so far.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        314 hours ago

        Fairy Tale is a great modern book of his. I am partial to The Revival myself, but I like a slow burn. I would say The Stand, uncut, is a masterpiece and worth the extremely long read. I enjoyed The Talisman, which is in line with Fairy Tale in being a kind of fantasy-horror adventure.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    320 hours ago

    Very slow-burning books, and I almost always lost interest before finishing them. I found The Dark Tower especially tedious. After I couldn’t force myself read it, I got the audiobook version a lnd tried to listen to it three times, but always fell asleep. Ironically, the books I genuinely enjoyed were some of his longest ones: It, and The Stand.

    As Richard Bachman, on the other hand, he wrote loads of entertaining books. It almost seems like in that persona he didn’t give a shit what others thought of his works, and the books ended up eminently readable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      320 hours ago

      Funny. I had the same experience. I loved the stand and it but couldn’t get past an hour or 2 of the dark tower.

      • @person420
        link
        24 hours ago

        The gunslinger is definitely a hard one to get going (but it does get going) because he was super young when he wrote it (I think he was like 19 or something like that) but overall the Dark Tower series is one of the best pieces of fiction I’ve ever read. Especially if you’re familiar with his world building (lots of books live within the Dark Tower universe like The Stand, Salem’s Lot, even The Shining to an extent). It also has one of the most memorable open lines of any book series “The man in black fled across the desert, and the gun slinger followed”.

      • @person420
        link
        1
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Check out some of his novellas like The Langoliers, If It Bleeds, Elevation, etc. They are shorter reads (for King at least, usually only a couple hundred pages) and generally get straight to the point (instead of spending a chapter describing a scene).

        That and his short stories are some of his best work. It might make you want to jump into some of his more iconic stuff or allow you to realize you don’t love his writing style and save you a couple thousand pages.

        The Boogeyman is my favorite short story from him. Jerusalem’s Lot is also the short story that Salem’s Lot comes from. Another great read.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        416 hours ago

        Like Tolkien, his writing style isn’t for everyone. Some are drawn in by the madness and cosmic horror realized, others can’t penetrate the veil and tune out. Then again, that’s what’s great about fiction and story telling. Finding what works best for you.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          116 hours ago

          I’ve read “the hobbit” last month and it was wonderful. I really enjoyed it. Then watched the movie and got really mad how they didn’t follow story. Same thing with “the count of Monte Cristo”, watched the 2000 movie and I wanted to go choke the director of the movie. WTH did they do that for. The whole story was messed up. Lol

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15 hours ago

            I never go into a movie expecting them to stay close to the book. To paraphrase Douglas Adams, each medium has it’s own way to tell a story and you can’t compare them equally

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              15 hours ago

              I get it, but the books were so good that the movies made me mad. Especially, the count of Monte cristo. That really got on my nerves. They actually modified the story to tell different events. :/

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 hours ago

                I’m just sad that the middle earth movies didn’t include Tom Bombadil. Yeah, it would have severely interrupted the movie flow but that’s kinda Tom’s whole deal.

                The Hearts in Atlantis movie is wholly different from the book and I really can’t get myself to enjoy the movie even when trying not to compare because the underpinning plot drivers were removed. It would be like doing King’s Insomnia as a movie and not including the little doctors.

                It’s complicated and a difficult tightrope to walk for people who enjoy both book and movie stories

  • themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    342 days ago

    The thing about King is, and he’ll admit this now, he used to do a bunch of drugs and hammer out several novels back to back. He’s an incredibly talented writer, but sometimes his stories are just some cool shit he thought of that doesn’t really go anywhere. Sometimes there’s deep introspection, sometimes it’s just a big scary dog that terrorizes a family.

    And Cujo is great. Read it. Read all his books. Just not all at once. The Dark Tower series is another good example, because it does a lot of world building, but also sometimes the story just happens and everyone moves on to the next thing. The Stand has a similar issue. It is well written, meandering, thoughtful, and mindeless all at the same time.

    There’s also a loosely connected universe between the Shining, It, The Dark Tower, The Stand, and probably a few others I’m forgetting. These are all good books/series, but my recommendation is not to read them back to back. You’ll start to see the patterns and fall backs he uses as an author when he just needs to wrap things up and publish the book.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      419 hours ago

      Doctor Sleep also expands on the powers in The Shining and Needful Things references many of the evil entities in the stand and It.

      I have always loved the way King weaves his baddies into many of his stories and basically implies that they are all the same kind of evil dressed up in the “clothing” to suit its purpose at any given time.

      Now that I think of it…I think in Cujo when he is narrating the dogs infected mind, he alludes to the generalized evil as well. It’s been a while since I read that one tho.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 day ago

    I personally like Stephen King. I grew up reading Carrie, Cujo, Misery, etc. They are iconic.

    I started reading again a year ago but found them very long to physically read. I listen to them now and noticed a pattern. Many are slow burns, often have an older male involved (or maybe because I just read 11/22/63, Pet Sementary, and Fairytail around the same time), always have characters that reminisce, world building is great with all the details, solid characters.

    I wouldn’t read many all at the same time. Try a Stephen King rec, 1 or 2. If you dont like, move on. He doesn’t just do horror. He can do other genres too. Very talented.

    I still like his stuff. I just read Holly and liked it. Tried Fairytale. Wasnt my thing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71 day ago

    I really liked 11/22/63, it was my first King novel, but then I read The Outsider and was disillusioned.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    172 days ago

    I find his short stories better than his novels.

    “Night Shift” is my favorite of those collections.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’ve read every Steven King book. They all have varying levels of depth, but they’re all very well written and immersive. I think everyone here had a reasonable point about a lot of his endings turning out fast and dark.

    You may not enjoy this if you like stories that feel like they come to a proper conclusion, but I think that’s where he excels at making his stories feel dark. The endings are almost always NOT satisfying. They often hurt.

    Another thing people don’t like about him is that he’s a period writer, so lots of his writing is filled with current events from the time when he wrote the book. This makes a lot of his older books feel really dated (like Tommyknockers). But it’s good for me.

    Also, like most people who have also commented, i recommend starting with his short stories, and his more popular works. They really are good.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 day ago

    My experience with him is unusual since the only thing I read of his works was his treatise on writing, a sort of memoir in which he recounts his experience with writing and work ethic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 day ago

    Fuck Steven king. He wrote a perfectly good start to the dark tower series. Then he wrote books 5,6 and 7 and fucked it all up. God-damned son of a bitch. I’d have preferred to have been left with blue balls after wizard and glass than to have gone through the shit that followed.

    But, that being said, I highly recommend books 1-4 of the dark tower series.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      THANK YOU! The six year long cliff-hanger to Wizard and Glass was enough for me to stop reading his books altogether.

      Movies made from King books are usually classics, though, as long as King himself is not part of the production process. His remake of The Shining was a stream of hot vomit to the face. But Kubrik’s version is a masterpiece.

  • geekwithsoul
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 days ago

    Recommend starting off on some of his short story collections and if you like those, there’s a good chance you’ll like at least some of his novels. I’ve been reading most of his stuff for 40 years and have pretty much enjoyed all of his work. His endings can be iffy and he tends to sometimes feel a little tropey, but the writing itself is often enjoyable to read and solid. His book on writing called appropriately “On Writing” is excellent and great for understanding the writing process either as someone who wants to write or as a reader who wants to better be able to think about what they like to read and why.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 days ago

    I grew up reading his early works in the 80’s and beyond. Well written, novel themes, sometimes fucked up beyond belief. It’s obvious he did lots of drugs.

    Recommended.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 days ago

    I really enjoy Steven King’s work. He has an engaging style and some great, often spooky ideas.

    He doesn’t plan his stories out; he just writes and lets the story flow, essentially shooting from the hip. Sometimes this works out great, other times he winds up resolving things with a deus ex machina. Generally you aren’t reading his books for the ending, but rather the journey. His short stories tend to avoid this issue - it’s much harder to write yourself into a corner when the story isn’t that long.

    The best introduction to King is probably his first novel, “Carrie.” Some of it is now cliche or standard tropes, but that’s just because of how impactful this book was. “Firestarter” is another great introduction.

  • Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 days ago

    Years ago I went through a phase of reading his books one after the other. I devoured several of them and had a great time reading. Then I kind of hit a wall with it and haven’t read him since. I still like him, and will read more at some point. But I sort of overdosed on it. I needed to branch out, read other writers, and take an extended hiatus from King. But it was fun to binge on it.

    I loved the Dark Tower, but it’s a slog. And he did one thing in that series that made me roll my eyes. But overall it’s a masterpiece. I won’t spoil the one dumb thing, but anyone who’s read it probably knows what I’m talking about. (I’m not talking about the ending. Some people HATE the ending, but it made sense to me once I thought about it.)

    His big hits are all big hits for a reason. Some book snobs look down on him, but if you like fantasy and horror, you can ignore the critics. He writes engaging stories in a well-honed style, not high falutin’ literature.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      I reread a lot of books a lot of times, especially ones I actually bought and enjoyed most of the ride. (We’re talking ~100-200 new books a year and more that are repeats, mostly audiobook.)

      The ending to the dark tower is so bad I’ll probably never read it again. It’s not the premise. Plenty of books have done that premise perfectly well. It’s the most horrendously bad presentation of that premise that I’ve ever seen.

      Steven King endings always feel like he just got bored and wrote whatever awful trash he could think of with no intention whatsoever, and it’s even more frustrating because he has interesting ideas and makes them moderately compelling at the start. I’d say it feels like a pretty solid author just handed the last chapter to a random kid to write, but I think the kid would do a better job. He just never has any idea where he’s actually going by midway through the book, and doesn’t know how to end a book with “spooky” questions still in the air either.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      I agree with your points and did the same thing binging on his work a few years back after never having read anything by him before.

      I assume the dumb thing you’re referring to is

      Tap for spoiler

      writing himself into the story?