• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1072 months ago

    One can be folded into oragami. The other can be shot from a slingshot. I am truly enlightened.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    902 months ago

    Damn. I always felt bad enough for women with big boobs having to deal with the back pain, but I never considered that they might jingle, too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    512 months ago

    Bills won’t weigh you down when you’re hiking or make your pocket sag if they’re there a long time.

  • Dampyr 🇺🇦 🇵🇸
    link
    fedilink
    492 months ago

    I’ve got a question for you. What’s heavier, a kiogram of coins or a kilogram of bills? That’s right a kilogram of coins, because coins are heavier than bills

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      As do I, but I can also see the hate they get. One of my partners ended up getting a reduction from like DDD to B and she’s much happier and is better physically for it. My wife kept her DD and they’re great too.

      As I’ve gotten older, I’ve come to terms that big tiddies and small tiddies are both still tiddies, and tiddies are fun to play with no matter the size.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I can rest a bag of coins on my face and reach nirvana, while resting a single bill on my face is pointless.

  • Grayox
    link
    fedilink
    122 months ago

    Never thought id see a koan in green text.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    I wonder if there is any evolutionary advantage to larger breasts. AFAIK, there’s no difference in their ability to deliver milk to babies. And smaller breasts probably have an advantage in a woman’s movement and agility, not to mention avoiding back pain. Humans also seem to be the only animal that has larger breasts than necessary – OTOH, humans are also the only mammal that walks upright, so there are other biological differences.

    If it’s the case that the only evolutionary reason for large breasts is to better attract (some) men, that would be interesting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      Milk cows have larger breasts than necessary, but that’s from artificial breeding rather than any sort of evolution or adaptation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        Their larger breasts are necessary since they require a high milk output to reproduce effectively (due to selective pressure of breeding)

        Just because the pressure is not “natural” doesn’t mean its not real.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      If it’s the case that the only evolutionary reason for large breasts is to better attract (some) men, that would be interesting.

      It’s not like large breasts are more common than not large (unless you mean anything larger than nothing at all). I suspect there was a random mutation, and it didn’t hurt their reproduction chances but it didn’t help either. So you end up with a variety of breast sizes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        For some reason, only one ape species ever has non-small breasts. You never get large breasted gorillas, chimpanzees or bonobos even though they share 98% of their DNA with us. What is it about humans that means that that trait was evolutionarily advantageous? It’s obviously a feature with significant disadvantages, so what is the advantage that offsets that for humans in a way that it doesn’t for other great apes?