• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    87 hours ago

    Dunno what kind of economic model we’d need if we had star trek -level replication technology.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      105 hours ago

      We could just explore, try to learn new interesting things, and have campy holodeck adventures with Mark Twain.

      I don’t think the current rich people would approve. But screw’em if we have replicators

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 minutes ago

        The economy would crash and millions of people would starve. I wish I were kidding. We humans are really fucking dumb.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      85 hours ago

      I always thought the “you wouldn’t download a car” ads were based on an assumption that star trek replicator technology would be evil (with the public argument that it would put people out of jobs and the real reason being it would be harder to base a wealth-based hierarchy and system of middlemen on).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 hours ago

        The original ad was “you wouldn’t steal a car,” literally claiming that downloading a movie is morally equivalent to carjacking.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 hours ago

          From the people who brought us private sex islands, in both underage and cult varieties. Fucking hate Hollywood dictating morality to everyone else.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 hours ago

          Ah, yeah, it might have been the implication that they were equivalent that got me thinking that rather than them using “download” instead of “steal”.

          They also lost me with the sappy ads about the crews that don’t make millions from the movies, as if the studios would even be able to produce movies without paying crews (and weren’t already doing everything they could to reduce that expense).

          Especially when I knew that it was the studios’ fault theatres had to gouge people on snacks because those greedy fucks wanted all of the ticket sales money, despite theatres requiring money to run and maintain.

          And don’t get me started on Hollywood accounting and how it was used to claim Return of the Jedi made 0 profit to fuck over the actor behind one of the most iconic roles in film (who wanted royalties instead of a set pay but made the mistake of believing they were negotiating with him in good faith and weren’t just fucking vultures).

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      15 hours ago

      Need? None, really. It’s like when you get to the North Pole, the entire concept of “north” breaks down. It would be the same with post-scarcity. Or should be, except…

      Have? Completely up to the whims of whoever controls the technology. Which… takes a look at the planet will be whoever is left standing once the nut jobs wipe out everyone that they hate. “Computer, ICBM, nuclear.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5720 hours ago

    Picked up the Bluray series off eBay. Physical media seems like the way to go, to really own anything

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      … Ripped to a media server. It’ll be a cold day in hell before I can be arsed to stand up and put media into a machine anymore.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2118 hours ago

      Physical media seems like the way to go, to really own anything

      That or sailing the digital sea, which ig you could consider a bunch of DRM-free files on a drive you own to still be “physical media”

      • @TheKMAP
        link
        English
        25 hours ago

        Do you really think the automation governments use don’t understand euphemism. Just say piracy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          45 hours ago

          Do you really think people say things like sailing the digital sea to avoid persecution? Just say whatever sounds cool to you

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1217 hours ago

          Iirc, the studio(s) likely wouldn’t be able to do much better for Voyager as they didn’t record Voyager onto film like the others. They cheaped out and recorded direct to VHS

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3819 hours ago

    The federation is like living at your parent’s house. Things are free under their roof, but if you want to drink with Quark, you’re going to have to trade your star fleet allowance for latinum.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    fedilink
    1719 hours ago

    The real problem is Paramount+ won’t accept any of my worthless gold.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1018 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure by the end, even Roddenberry had come to accept that humans will never be so selfless as a species and the Starfleet he dreamt of could never exist. That’s why his later stuff was more bleak. There’s just absolutely no way that the money free world they describe is good for everyone

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      47 minutes ago

      There’s just absolutely no way that the money free world they describe is good for everyone.

      Can you elaborate, please? In a hypothetical future where money doesn’t exist and technology has granted everyone the means and freedom to pursue their own interests (as long as those interests aren’t harmful to others, of course), I’m having difficulty understanding why that wouldn’t be amazing. Maybe not perfect, but vastly improved over what we’re stuck with now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      517 hours ago

      I believe there is a way. Nanotechnology helped along by artificial intelligence could conceivably bring material abundance to everyone. This would be a world dramatically reshaped. Humanity might not even qualify as the same species anymore.

      Some people actually think that such a future is an inevitability; that it can’t be stopped. Short of everybody dying in a fire of course.

      • 🦄🦄🦄
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        28 hours ago

        What makes you think the powers that be would make this accessible to the poor?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          38 hours ago

          There has never been a case where governments are able to hide technology from the people for more than a decade at a time in modern history. It might start out expensive, innovations usually do, but over time the expense drops, someone makes a quick buck selling to the masses, and all of a sudden money is meaningless.

          Worst case scenario you may have to use your second amendment rights to acquire the technology for the masses, which is what it was designed for.

  • Howdy
    link
    fedilink
    1821 hours ago

    Stremio + torrentio + real-debrid friends.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    319 hours ago

    Ah yes, because in capitalism, Captains actually own their own ships and you don’t need to pay anyone to actually build it! Just use slaves enthusiastic volunteers!