Don’t worry. Prepare.
It’s all on Merrick Garland and the $upremely Courted, who have willingly led the American people to the chaos and violence lying in wait.
I’m gonna hold the politicians that lied to progress their career, the pundits that argued in bad faith, the clergy that put their faith aside for their political agenda, the people that sought to hide history instead of teaching it, those that worked hard to dehumanize those they disagree with, the leaders that opted for violence as a way to garner support, and I’m sure others, as responsible also.
I get it about the SC, but what did Garland do?
Unfortunately, the answer to your question is your question
Hmm. Well, not disagreeing, but, from your perspective, what should Garland have done that he failed to do? (And under which position - as he never made it to the SC and thus couldn’t have voted down any of the things that happened there).
He should have assigned special counsel MUCH earlier. He has slow walked and delayed everything. Milquetoast Merrick.
Ah, like in https://www.npr.org/2023/09/06/1197998443/hunter-biden-gun-charge-special-counsel-indictment
Think I finally am on the same page as you on this. Thank you for educating me!
If Roger Stone and his cronies or other random assholes try to stop the count and start a coup best believe there will be. We won’t go out like 2000 believe that.
NPR - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for NPR:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/04/nx-s1-5140605/biden-trump-election-outcome-peaceful
Tried that last time, ask Ashli Babbitt.
They sobered up real fucking quick.
The two sides are so rabidly opposed to the other’s candidates, that I would be surprised if something considerable didn’t happen around the time of this next election.
What are you going on about? When have Democrat supporters ever violently responded to an election outcome?