• Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      I’m pretty sure the answer is no unless they are browsing the internet in the shower. Also it still wouldn’t be a thought

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        223 months ago

        Y’all really don’t think about shit in the shower that happened outside of the shower?

        I can’t be the weird one here.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          This post feels more like an attempt to spread your political views. Even though most of Lemmy probably agrees with you I personally can’t help but feel this is a misuse of this community.

          This is probably just a misunderstanding so it is probably up to the mods. I’m guessing you don’t have malicious intentions.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            163 months ago

            Obviously it is political; can’t really dispute that. I did check the rules before posting (mostly because I wasn’t sure if links were allowed) but there was no mention of no politics ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • @[email protected]M
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This post was reported for being a news article not a shower thought. Also it seems like several of the comments are concerned that it is political.

    There isn’t a rule against posting a link. The article does seem relevant and OP’s thought isn’t taken from the article, it seems unique, like something you might think of in the shower after reading the article.

    There isn’t a rule against political posts. Many posts have some component of politics to them.

    Thank you all for being civil with each other. Thank you all for commenting and reporting when think something is pushing the limits on what should be considered a “shower thought”, it’s an abstract concept, so social pressure is helpful in shaping the community. I try to error on the side of being permissive.

    As always, I am open to feedback.

    Edit: spelling, ironically

  • Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    143 months ago

    The misspellings are against spam filters

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      183 months ago

      Could be both, I’ve gotten emails where a word is spelled correctly some time, and then spolled wrong other times

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    43 months ago

    I’ve tried multiple times to respond to these scam emails, I honestly don’t know what you have to say to get scammed. I’m totally ready to quickly go buy a temporary credit card from target or whatever

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    Honestly, these stories are sad. Half the reports even end with them holding out some hope that their money is still in some fake account (because they have screenshots!), or that the person that conned them was not the perpetrator.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    those spam/scam emails[sic] with intentional misspellings

    … like ‘emails’? Do your ‘emails’ have ‘datas’ in them?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        they’re saying “email” is the plural of “email,” and saying “emails” is like saying “datas” as the plural of “data,” which is weird since “emails” is definitely valid.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      … like ‘emails’? Do your ‘emails’ have ‘datas’[sic] in them?

      You mean ‘datums’?