Content Warning

This website contains age-restricted materials including nudity and explicit depictions of sexual activity.

By entering, you affirm that you are at least 18 years of age or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from and you consent to viewing sexually explicit content.

Lemmy NSFW
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 6 months ago

Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything?

message-square
109
link
fedilink
907

Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything?

ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 6 months ago
message-square
109
link
fedilink
  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    6 months ago

    Probably kiddie porn.

    • Shellbeach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        6 months ago

        “I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast”

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          6 months ago

          You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

      • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird…

        It’s the best read of it I can manage though…

      • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nah bro. He’s just copped to tryna fuck kids. Just republican shit.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write “you would be my bitches”. Not polite, MAGA polite.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

        I don’t know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it’s because I’m not into any sketchy shit.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s the step between mistress and partner.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh…yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

            At least with mistress’s and partners consent is a key factor.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

              It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage

        • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s an old term for a pleasure slave.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, concubinage was typically consensual.

            • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              6 months ago

              By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I’m trying to remember the exact quote, but I’ll paraphrase it here: ‘In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.’ https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.

            • leftzero
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Historically consent has often been quite optional, when it comes to marriage, concubinage, and the like…

Political Weirdos @lemmy.world

political_weirdos@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

  • Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
  • Follow Iemmy.world TOS
  • Don’t be a jerk
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 9 users / day
  • 380 users / week
  • 382 users / month
  • 4.62K users / 6 months
  • 6 local subscribers
  • 948 subscribers
  • 246 Posts
  • 7.54K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
  • UI: 0.19.11-nsfw
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org