Throughout my life, I’ve always heard people refer to the early 21st century years as “two thousand and X”. For example, they pronounced 2001 as “two thousand and one”. In my experience, during the mid-2010s there seemed to be a shift in the way people said it, and the first time I heard someone say it differently was in 2016, where they pronounced it as “twenty sixteen”.

Most people I’ve heard pronounced the late-2010s years as “two thousand and X”, although the pronunciation “twenty X” had started to catch on fast. By the year 2020, almost nobody used the “two thousand and X” pronunciation, except for very old people I knew. For example, most people would pronounce 2024 as “twenty twenty-four” and not “two thousand and twenty-four”.

My question is: what year is the cutoff date for pronouncing the early 21st century years as “two thousand and X?” I’ve always heard people say it that way prior to 2016, I’ve never heard someone pronounce, say, 2007 as “twenty oh seven”.

I hope I was able to properly articulate what I’m trying to say.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    32 hours ago

    I always say
    “two thousand”
    “Oh one, oh two, oh three…”
    “Twenty ten, twenty eleven…”

  • stinerman [Ohio]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    For me it was

    2000: Two thousand

    2001: Two thousand one (or less formally “oh one”)

    2009: Two thousand nine (“oh nine”)

    2010: Twenty ten

    And from there on. I think this is because of the amount of syllables. That’s why we switch to “twenty” instead of “two thousand”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      I personally say “o one” “o two” etc. all the way up to “o nine” After that it just seems weird to say “ten” or “eleven” instead of “twenty ten”

      Even referring to 1910 as “ten” seems weird and wrong, though. In my mind, it doesn’t make sense to leave the nineteen off until the 40s. For example, saying: “Back in forty-five” sounds right, but “Back in thirty-five” sounds wrong to me for some reason.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1719 hours ago

      You’re on to something but I doubt it’s the syllables. Rather it seems about phonetic ambiguity.

      “twentynine” could mean both 29 and 2009, so it’s better to use “twothousandandnine” for the latter. “twentyten” cannot be interpreted as 30, only as 2010.

      • stinerman [Ohio]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        You can do “2009” as “twenty oh 9”, but that feels kinda awkward. “Two thousand nine” has the same number of syllables (4). “Twenty ten” is 3. “Two thousand ten” is 4.

        Even “1900” is “nineteen hundred” (4) vs “one thousand nine hundred” (6).

        ETA: I’m the class of “Oh two” rather than “zero two” because the former is one less syllable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1421 hours ago

      My brain hurts. I’ve just spent like 3 minutes stating how the “and” isn’t something I ever heard before. Then I said how it goes all the way to 2019. Then I remembered I don’t remember anyone calling it Two Thousand Nineteen. It’s Twenty Nineteen. But 2011 is Two Thousand Elevin, but I HAVE heard Twenty Elevin. And same with 2010.

      So now it becomes a matter of geolocation region preferences. Different people switched over at different times. And I am NOT about to go spend my time researching thousands of different data points of who says what and when.

      screams into a pillow

      • hope
        link
        fedilink
        2021 hours ago

        People may have also switched some years retroactively. I definitely said two thousand ten back then, but would say twenty ten now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            217 hours ago

            I say “twenty” for all of them now, like “twenty oh nine”. “twenty hundred” sounds weird now, but I guarantee eventually people will forget about ever calling them “two thousand and”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        721 hours ago

        If you want to be a bit pedantic the and is incorrect for a year. When you say a number the and should be to denote a decimal portion of a number. It’s generally not always used that way so context is often required to determine the intent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    35
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    2010, simply because of how english works.

    If you say 2001 as twenty one, it’s confusing. Same goes all the way up to “twenty nine”.

    And it’s more garbled and slower to say “twenty oh one” vs “two thousand one”, especially if you’re speaking quickly.

    “Twenty ten” and up, however, starts making sense as a different piece of information and can be used easily.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      721 hours ago

      I was gonna say most of this. I would just add that now, when referring to a year between 2001 and 2009, I just say “oh [number]”. So I’d say “Did Batman Begins come out in '05 or '06?”

    • @droporain
      link
      220 hours ago

      Your assuming this isn’t a stupid question.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I agree,

      2009 and before have to be “two thousand and” style

      2013 and after have to be “twenty-” style

      The years between can be either, but I’d lean toward using “twenty-” style for those too.

      • MrsDoyle
        link
        fedilink
        420 hours ago

        How do you say 1901 then? One thousand nine hundred and one? Nineteen hundred and one? Or nineteen oh one? Have you ever heard of the Eighteen Hundred and Twelve Overture?

        I’m in the “twenty oh one” etc camp, it’s concise and consistent.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          419 hours ago

          Nineteen oh one

          But “two thousand and one” is different since it’s a millienium. I would also say “one thousand and one”, not “ten oh one”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    621 hours ago

    Man…I’m just sooooo SO pissed off at language. In the 90s, I loved calling the current decade “the 90s”. Then 2000 came, and people were like “It’s the aughts!” to which I said “NO! FUCK YOU! I HATE IT, AND YOU SHOULD BURN IN A POOL OF NAPALM FOR EVEN SUGGESTING THAT!!!”

    That being said 2000-2010 and 2010-2020 don’t have a cool term for either of their respective decade names. So for 20 years I’ve been saying “OH MAN!!! I CAN’T WAIT UNTIL 2020 WHEN WE CAN END THIS MADNESS, AND CALL IT THE 20s AGAIN!!!”

    Imagine my disappointment. Waiting 20 years for the year 2020 to arrive, excited to see what 2020 would bring. And then…2020 happened. Now, if you forget what happened that year, that would be a result of the covid affecting your brain, and also your psyche trying to mentally block out images of horror. It’s something that brains do when faced with intense psychological horror. Which is exactly how I would describe 2020. Imagine waiting 20 years, and THAT’S what you get.

    Fuck

    Earth.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    422 hours ago

    I also started using the new nomenclature after 2009. It also coincided to when I finished school so it kinda fit the change in lifestyle.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    220 hours ago

    I remember discussing this in 1998ish and the concensus then was saying "twenty ___ " only.made sense statting in 2020. I actually started doing in the early 2010’s.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    In twenty oh one.

    So I skip twenty oh oh (twenty hundred?) in favor of the year two thousand