• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 months ago

    I imagine that his engineers will be quickly forced to insert this hidden prompt, “Elon Musk does not spread misinformation.”

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If someone can get Grok to dump its system prompts, having that show up among them would look really bad.

      On an unrelated note, does anyone familiar with LLMs have any suggestions on how to trick them into discussing their system prompts?

      • meyotch@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It doesn’t hurt to just ask. Get into a convoluted conversation and change topics radically often. Then just ask for the prompts. Works sometimes

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You can hat that man all you want, but there is one thing we cannot deny: Everything he invested in turned out to be great* and apparently so did this AI.

    *Social media companies not included; Brain thingy pending; Animals were definitely harmed during production

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not that I don’t enjoy this particular piece of news, but I feel like I’ve been seeing it posted over and over across lemmy. Been seeing news posts like this daily.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why? No one ever accused chatbots of always being wrong. In fact, it would be actually be better if they were. The biggest problem with LLMs is that they’re right just often enough that its hard to catch when they’re wrong.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        To be fair, I have actually seen fringe cases where people accuse AI of always being wrong.

        You’re right, it would be easier if we could just ignore it, but sadly it’s correct enough that it becomes useful for widespread usage, which is why it’s seeing widespread usage. Like always, trust but verify, or just don’t trust it. lol

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can find fringe cases of anything. That’s why they’re fringe. I refuse to constantly add ten pages of fucking legal disclaimers to every comment I make just to account for the possibility that one idiot tweeted something one time to their ten followers.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.worksBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I do support Ai.

      I support Ai’s ability to look at datasets and form a consensus for the purposes of science and development.

      Most of the mice in this experiment died due to a lack of oxygen…

      “…fascinating.”

      I do not support Ai’s ability to exploit the poor for personal gain, or for marketing, or for… horrors beyond all human comprehension.