• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13 hours ago

    Retire to some island in the middle of nowhere and build myself an evil villain lair. Once money runs out threaten for 1 Beeeellion dollars. If 300 billion usd isn’t spent then donate the rest to some child cancer hospital or something anonymously post-mortem.

    Any other choice would be suboptimal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 hours ago

      not a economist, but no, it does not help (at least not really in short term, in very long it does pay okay-ish (depends on what kind of debt is it, but it can help keep ties with other nations intact))

  • Bear
    link
    English
    17 hours ago

    Create the world’s largest charitable foundation and make everyone beg before their presentations.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Fund free education and health care for everyone in the world regardless of race, nationality and creed. Imposed no matter how much kicking and screaming certain countries might do to oppose it. With appropriate countermeasures for each specific country that opposes it. A random country in the middle east that hates educating girls or whatever? Armed guards and other related measures as needed. US has entrenched for profit health care? Fund legislation that rips out the entire system by the roots etc.

    Excess funds would be invested in such a way as to fund those programs in perpetuity. With safeguards put in place so that I can be reasonably certain that it won’t be easy to dismantle from within or without.

    Assuming I have enough money left over, I’d do the same for housing.

    If I still have money left over if also fund ways of tackling the climate crisis and changing corporate strategy so instead of chasing infinite growth in a finite world the mentality is more about stability and stewardship, of the company and of the planet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Change other countries beliefs, by force if necessary? Ive heard that before somewhere…

      But its not wrong because were the good guys!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 hours ago

        Not what I had in mind when I said that, but intent doesn’t translate well over text. What I had in mind is protection for the school/students from people who would rather enforce their views through force, nothing more than that. The idea is that everyone has a chance to get an education.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          126 minutes ago

          Yeah that sounds better^^ But Im afraid it wouldnt be that effective then, if e.g. a majority of a country believes that women shouldnt go to school, most probably wouldnt even if given the chance, because of pressure from friends and family.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      316 hours ago

      There are about 2 billion people under 14 in the world. Assuming half of them have access to free education you would still only have $300 per student.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2924 hours ago

    Assassinate the other billionaires. I genuinely believe billionaires are the source of all the biggest problems the planet has right now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 hours ago

      Exactly what I came here to say. Hire a group, and tell them to start at the top of the Forbes list and work their way down. Send anonymous letters to media outlets that surrendering their wealth is the only way to save their lives.

      It would dramatically improve the quality of living on this planet within 3 months.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      922 hours ago

      Someone is simply going to take their place. The problem isn’t the billionaires themselves, its the system.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1621 hours ago

        We can do a lot more to change the system without a bunch of over-moneyed under-principled techbros trying to stop us.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 hours ago

          But if we do that today, what do we do tomorrow? When someone someone else takes that vacant CEO position and starts receiving that ludicrous salary, what then?

          If you killed every billionaire every month, they probably wouldn’t have time to seriously affect society, but then I suspect we’d have other problems. I have a feeling that would produce some negative outcomes for the economy and general quality of life.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 hours ago

          You’re just worried about the loud ones who are usually loud because they aren’t rich. Its the quiet really rich ones you need to worry about

  • matlag
    link
    fedilink
    441 day ago

    I buy social medias and news outlets. Then I weaponize them to support a clueless gullible idiot candidate for POTUS.

    I use my influence on him to get a position that will allow me to get grossly richer by favoring my own businesses, including crushing unions and force my employees to work to death on low wages.

    When I reach 1 trillion $, I’ll have much more resources to improve the planet and living conditions of my fellow humans.

    But wait! Maybe I could do even more for humankind with 2 trillions $??

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    521 hours ago

    There is a danish researcher called Björn Lomborg who has been researching this type of question a lot. He tends to get a lot of hate because the most cost efficient ways to spend money to do good isn’t what people want it to be.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        514 hours ago

        Iirc, micronutrients and HIV prevention, followed by preventing malaria. The idea is that we spend a little money now, to make many people grow up and be healthy, which avoids big costs to societies while at the same time generating people who can contribute more to the same societies. Many people want to solve the climate first, but it’s very expensive for very little return. In an ideal world we would solve all the problems, but… we don’t. So if we have limited resources, we should spend it where it does most long-term good. It’s not a bad idea to do good things for the climate, but if we have to choose between things to do, it gives little benefit per dollar compared to other things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 day ago

    bribe (sorry, i mean lobby) politicians to vote in interest of humanity. Environmental protection, public healthcare, solve the housing crisis/homeless epidemic, increase education budget spending, etc.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    291 day ago

    Create a fake lottery to help get a fascist into office for the end goal of turning that $300bil into $1tril.