Frontier Airlines CEO Barry Biffle blamed higher overhead costs on workers being less productive, calling it a “society-wide” problem.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1221 year ago

    In today’s episode of “White male cisgender affluent, mentally disconnected from reality, emotionally immature CEO, has an irrational hissy fit in public over someone or something that doesn’t let him be cruel and controlling over other humans”…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What does them being white or cisgender have anything to do with it? An idiot is an idiot regardless of the race or gender of the person.

      Unnecessary labels for the subject at hand, imo.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Have you noticed that most (almost all) CEOs are white male cis gendered? I’m sure it’s a coincidence though, they definitely deserve their wealth beyond imagination, as they are objectively superior human beings, and I’m 100% sure they didn’t do anything unethical to amass their incalculable power and affluent life style.

          • TonyOstrich
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            What does that have to do with the makeup of CEOs in the US? If you look at the demographics of CEOs here vs the demographics of the population here, the CEO demographics aren’t even close to that of the population. They usually aren’t even close to the demographics of the companies they head. Doesn’t that seem kinda odd?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              161 year ago

              Just a quick search for the CEO’s of the biggest companies provides a nice list. https://ceoworld.biz/2023/03/17/the-worlds-most-influential-ceos-and-business-executives-of-2023/

              In the top 10, 7 are cis white men, along with these 3:

              1. Karen Lynch, CVS
              2. Amin Nasser, Aramco
              3. Sundar Pachai, Alphabet

              Bringing up sexual orientation, gender Identity, and racial identity is what these billionaires want. Plenty of “girl bosses” have shown they are perfectly capable of exploiting labor. Peter Thiel is a perfect example of how you don’t have to be straight to oppress people. The CEO of Microsoft isn’t white.

              UAW just announced a strike against 3 manufacturers today, including GM whose CEO is Mary Teresa Barra.

              Then of course there’s tons of CEO’s and billionaires from Asia, Mexico, and the Middle-East. Calling out Cis White Men does nothing but cause further divisions between members of the working class. There’s plenty of CIS straight white men out there laboring and being repressed by a variety of different demographics.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -7
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So 7 out of 10 top CEOs are white cis males. But somehow gender and racism has nothing to do with it. Hmm, interesting logic.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  Yes I think that’s perfectly sound logic.

                  If 10/10 of the top CEO’s were white cis males if say “that’s interesting, let’s look at a larger sample size”. As it stands, it seems there is a statistically significant population of non-white and non-male CEO’s. This dataset doesn’t include sexual orientation, and even if I cared to look that information up for each individual it’s hard to ascertain the accuracy. I would expect most, if not all, CEO’s to be cis because… that’s the same trend as all of humanity. Approximately 1% of the US population is transgender, and a good portion of those are young people. CEO’s tend to be older as the job (in theory) requires experience, so I wouldn’t expect to see significant trans representation there for a few more decades.

                  What are you hoping to accomplish by calling out gender and racism though? Because the only thing you’re actually accomplishing is further dividing the working class against each other and playing right into the hands of these people.

        • Poggervania
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          So if he were a non-white trans CEO, does that suddenly make it ok to do stuff like this?

          Being a shitty CEO - nay, a shitty human being - is not mutually exclusive to white people.

            • Poggervania
              link
              fedilink
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Believe it or not, it can be implied with your original comment. You’re saying “of course it’s a white male cisgender CEO” - but if it were, for example, a black trans person, would you suddenly go “of course it’s a black trans CEO”? By labelling something, you’re suddenly saying that everything that you didn’t explicitly label is somehow different - somehow, a non-white, non-male, non-cis CEO is different than a white male cis CEO.

              As another user said, it’s an unnecessary label for the context at hand that serves, at best, to make people go “ok, the labels are unnecessary but go for it”, and at worst it divides people because people are stupid and will get hung up on culture and identity in contexts where neither are needed.

              EDIT: Should clarify, I understand you were stereotyping the old rich white man, but adding the “cisgender” bit was unnecessary for that purpose. Most people will get that regardless and it’s ultimately a semantics thing, but it can be dangerous rhetoric if you throw it around willy-nilly. Like I said - everything you didn’t explicitly label is somehow different, even if you just said “old rich white guy”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      The irony of the CEO of fucking Frontier Airlines, the Dollar Store of airlines, calling people lazy lmao

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        What’s that? You’re having an opinion on one of our flights?

        That’ll be a $34.99 aerial opinion fee; you can pay as you disembark the plane, or, in the future, if you anticipate having an opinion on one of our flights, you can save $5 by paying the fee from your home computer!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    CEOs have expense accounts that cover most of their stuff. Take calls and work remotely all the time. I guess we can’t remove their silliness can we?

    This puritanical work mentality is horrible. We’re supposed to live. Not just be profit generators for these miserable cunts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    All the data collected has shown productivity went sharply UP with professionals working from home.

    These are desperate rich people with a stake in corporate real estate quickly becoming worthless.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      These folks know that the middle class has been bled dry, and soon, the billionaires won’t have anyone left to exploit except the millionaires like him

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Disregarding the bullshit he’s spewing: Why the fuck would I want to work hard for a boss like this overly entitled meatbag?

  • skellener
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    He doesn’t realize there’s a tipping point where we just eat the rich.

  • @OneStepAhead
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    Man who’s job depends on people traveling, wants people To travel more…. Shocking.