This website contains age-restricted materials including nudity and explicit depictions of sexual activity.
By entering, you affirm that you are at least 18 years of age or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from and you consent to viewing sexually explicit content.
Nah, doesn’t look like the picture.
that’s what I’m sayin; unrelated let’s get you on that jury
0% chance of that happening. I don’t live in NY, and I’m willing to bet they’re gonna go extra tough on weeding out people even slightly knowledgeable about jury nullification.
That’s not the type of info that someone would necessarily volunteer unless they had no intnention of using it. The beautiful thing about it is that even if a person perjured themself about knowing of jury nullification, the one time they’d realisticly make use of it couldn’t actually be used as evidence/testimony against them.
-They may weed out the young and educated, though.
Isn’t the picture not even confirmed to be the shooter? So comparing a sus picture to a suspect seems like it’s getting pretty far removed.
All the more reason to doubt they got the right guy.