• ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, she actually said “Delay, Deny, Depose. You people are next,”

      That’s a pretty direct threat. The headline is misleading.

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t think so, no. Context is everything though. Before the assassination, just free speech, after, a threat of significant violence.

          Also, free Luigi!

          • meliaesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I suppose so, but the thought process of just jailing any verbal dissent… how long can, a healthcare system of all things, run on fear?

            • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Well, it’s not just any dissent, it a threat of violence. If she didn’t say, “you’re next” I’d be agreeing with most of the people in this thread.

              Whoever posted this left that part out of the post. I wonder why.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pointing out that what someone is doing puts a target on their back isn’t necessarily you threatening them.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s because she said they’re next, and it was recorded. Threats aren’t protected speech.