Summary

At the first meeting of the DOGE Caucus, a new congressional group focused on government efficiency, Republican Rep. Greg Lopez stated that cuts to Social Security and Medicare are likely “on the table” as part of debt reduction efforts.

The caucus, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to slash government spending, raising concerns among advocacy groups about potential attacks on anti-poverty programs.

Critics, including Social Security Works, warn the caucus may push for privatization and benefit reductions.

This comes despite Trump’s prior commitment to protect these programs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    527 minutes ago

    It’s funny at this point. Either the rich pay their share or we Mangione them. Tick tock musky. Tik fuckin tok.

  • TipRing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    223 hours ago

    Yes, they want to roll back the entire New Deal and have corporate serfdom again. They have been saying it for years and now they have their chance.

  • Zeppo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 hours ago

    Lovely how this incredibly wealthy person is laser focused on making things worse for poor people. I suppose it’s the usual ploy of making people as desperate as possible so people like him can prey on us more easily.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1345 hours ago

    Friendly reminder that Social Security is a separate government program that funds itself.

    What Musk is talking about is stealing from Social Security in order to cut taxes elsewhere (namely cutting taxes for people like Musk).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 hours ago

        That’s not completely true. Long ago they put it into the general fund. There is always a shortfall in the general fund. Before they put it in there it was solvent, and if they wouldn’t have it would be completely solvent today.

        It was already stolen. They want the rest.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        605 hours ago

        I think a good start would be to stop allowing Republicans to raid Social Security for quick cash, like they’ve been constantly doing since the Reagan administration.

    • Maestro
      link
      fedilink
      65 hours ago

      How does it fund itself? What’s the income? Just Social Security Tax?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        465 hours ago

        Yes, it’s a payroll tax. Your paycheck may show how much you are paying into Social Security. This is money meant to help you and others after retirement. Musk wants to take that money and instead use it to fill unrelated gaps in the federal budget, gaps caused by Trump’s tax cuts for the very wealthy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          134 hours ago

          Holy shit I never realized it until you explained it like this. Thank you, and also we are fucked.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            This is one of the rare cases where I want to laugh at the silly US, but can’t because our “scial security” (we call it “retirement savings”) is being missapropriated for general funds as well :(

            I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 hour ago

              I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

              Social Security got the structure it has after the Great Depression wiped… well, you know. Everyone. Out.

              I’m sure your private equity will be run much more responsibly throughout your life though, no need for some big ol’ stupid government to guarantee your retirement or anything. Carry on!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 hours ago

          Social Security fund invested in government bonds, so the interest from that goes into the fund.

          To be fair the budget deficit was there before Trump. His campaign promises are going to increase it, but they can offset that partially with spending cuts. Also, the government has been using money from the Social Security fund routinely, again nothing new under Trump. They just count it as an internal debt. According to Wikipedia, by 2022 it’s been already about 20% of the fund “borrowed” by the government.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    886 hours ago

    Wow! Who woulda guessed they would immediately reneg on a campaign “promise” and immediately attack the side of the population that most reliably votes for them?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Disabled people will be first to be killed by this. It is already a Herculean task to be approved for SSDI and takes years for many despite clearly documented and proven disabilities. And it does not pay out enough for most recipients. That will only get worse if SSA is targeted. I am not legally allowed to state my opinion on this.

    • aramis87
      link
      fedilink
      43 hours ago

      Interestingly enough, social security’s disability trust fund has enough money to continue paying out until 2098; it’s the old person part that’s running out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        359 minutes ago

        It should also be mentioned that it wouldn’t be running out if they didn’t cap the taxable income at $168,000. If you make $168,000 a year you pay the same social security tax as every millionaire and billionaire. BuT iTs InSoLvEnT

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    doesn’t need to be, of course. they just want to cut social security because ‘the poors’ rely on it more.

    debt reduction efforts

    deep-six every loophole used mostly or only by the wealthy to avoid paying their share of taxes.

    increase funding for irs, streamline enforcement actions, give them the resources needed to go after the big fish.

    eliminate the cap on social security contributions, lower the ceiling on benefits for the very wealthy retirees, while raising the minimum benefit.

    single payer tax funded health care, paid by higher taxes on the wealthy.

    raise the capital gains rates. raise the estate tax, lower the assets value needed to trigger it.

    raise the marginal rates for high income earners (by a lot. i want reagan screaming from beyond)

    budget problem fixed. well over $2 trillion a year pumped into the economy by people who are now no longer padding insurance companies’ bottom lines with it. but we aren’t done yet…

    $12/hr min wage (wait wut!!! wait for it…)

    $24,000 universal tax credit for everyone. the higher taxes up^there on high income earners would negate this for them, and they fund it for the others that do receive it.

    this is a compromise between the $15 (or higher) crowd and small businesses. a little lower fed min wage than what’s being pushed, but then essentially doubled based on full time work via the tax credit all receive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The wealthy, who have had help all their life but imagine they did it all on their own, see needing help when you’re poor as a disgusting moral failing. Many of them will also call themselves Christians.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      106 hours ago

      This could end badly for them. Old people without a means to continue surviving either have to continue working till they die, or die fighting the government.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 hours ago

        There’s certain people who continue to receive social security from childhood if they have a qualifying disability and make under a certain amount of money. I think to qualify for social security your primary caregiver has to be on social security, like if you live with a grandparent or you have an older parent.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I’m not even touching on those on SSDI. Just the common retired 67 year old. Just imagine a retired Walmart worker with no SSI income. Way too many of them with nothing else to do other than die; be homeless, suffer and die; or die taking in the government.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        125 hours ago

        OK, but we have to make it absolutely crystal clear who is doing this, who it’s hurting, and who is benefiting. That’s why reporting like this is important.

        Trump just won an election by blaming democrats for Trump’s own terrible economy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 hours ago

          People have no idea how the government works and they’re not taught that for a reason. Most people also have very short memories and do not understand that most legislation takes years to take effect. They only remember what they are currently being told and the more times it is repeated the more effective the propaganda.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 hours ago

        And those of us who very much did not vote for this but will suffer from it anyway, fuck us too, right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 hours ago

      I don’t know what’s more intriguing- the lies or the fact that his base doesn’t notice it or doesn’t care.

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    125 hours ago

    This is going to go down like a lead ballon, even with the 60+ year old MAGAs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      357 minutes ago

      All they have to do is tell them the reason it has to be done is LIBRULS and boom. All anger directed at Nancy Pelosi, all is forgotten.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      94 hours ago

      I hate to tell you but it won’t. My in-laws fall into that category and I constantly watch them twist themselves into knots trying to justify this stuff. They would also rather do without insurance than watch someone “undeserving” get it for “free”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      They will blame immigrants, single mothers, non-whites and LGBTQ+ people, and ignore the facts.