• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 day ago

    Never mind that, when can I buy my $10,000 electric car with 2000 miles of range? That’s the important thing, here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    363 days ago

    “Slavery-like conditions”, as defined by Brazilian law, include debt bondage and work that violates human dignity.

    Remember this, everybody.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Violation of work dignity is part of mainland Chinese work culture. I guess the big heads in China still don’t understand the complaint

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1113 days ago

    ‘slavery’ in quotes really seems to soften the blow. Like the time I ‘punched’ my boss.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 days ago

    There’s a good reason why their cars are cheap, and only one part of it is Chinese state subsidies.

    • toofpic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 days ago

      The conditions were created by a Brazilian building contractor. It was not the factory environment, but the construction project environment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        Companies are responsible for hiring their subcontractors. They don’t get to pass on guilt through indirection.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 days ago

      They will still say “capitalism bad”.

      Capitalism isn’t perfect, but it’s the better system we have so far.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    483 days ago

    You know the irony of this picture is that in the early 90’s myself and eight others tricked out a cargo container with scaffold build bunks on a job. We were not alone in doing this. We paid the plant we were working at a very small amount of money for electricity and used the showers in their plant locker room. We were of course being paid and were free to run to town anytime. We had large cookouts on any days off we had. Which were very few. Good times. I remember a week in Vegas after we finally got laid off.

    Those poor souls though if they were forced to live like that need to be compensated.

  • BentiGorlich
    link
    fedilink
    273 days ago

    I think the destinction between the chinese firm constructing the site and BYD itself is quite important here. I am absolutely not a fan of chinese car manufacturers but its just not the same as if BYD was operating the site right now and this news came to light

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        343 days ago

        Some would argue that this is precisely why they ‘outsource’ just like mobsters do. It gives plausible deniability.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Absolutely, ignorance is tantamount to complicity. Especially since BYD will earn a profit on their slave labor.

      • BentiGorlich
        link
        fedilink
        33 days ago

        The site is not yet in operation. That has nothing to do with outsourcing… Its maybe bad supervision, but honestly most manufacturers fall in that category

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 days ago

          It’s not “outsourcing” in the common use of the term, but it’s establishing plausible deniability between the brand and the practice, which is “outsourcing” in an ironic sense.

          That said, I find the deniability completely implausible. BYD would be intimately aware of the progress and happenings on that site.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      283 days ago

      If you outsource your work, you outsource your reputation. BYD is absolutely responsible for the conditions of the workers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      263 days ago

      It is the same, sorry. When you hire a third party to build or expand your business, you’re accountable for what happens under your nose. Simply pointing fingers to outsourced work as if it were beyond one’s control does not cut here. If you wish to operate in Brazil, you must comply with local legislation. And stating that some companies break the law is the same as saying that some people are turning a blind eye to the legislation, too. BYD management must choose which side of the legal fence they want to be. Cheers!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    183 days ago

    All of those chip factories Congress is funding building in the US? Congress is also trying to pass legislation to import underpaid Taiwanese labor for them. I expect the conditions won’t be better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      prolly worthy of a whole 'nather post rather than derailing this one that isn’t about the US nor Taiwan.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        My point is, it’s a trend we’re seeing in exploitation of factory workers where countries are trying to bring back manufacturing from China. A lot of the domestic manufacturing in Brazil is due to the high import tariffs, which is gaining popularity here in the states, so I expect we’ll see an increase of this kinda exploitation.

        But yeah, you’re probably right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 days ago

      Ah, I’ve asked my late dad’s friend recently how did it happen that my dad left Samsung (he didn’t tell me), and it was generally the same story about the famed Asian work ethic. Hardly compatible with correctness, having dignity and not being a snitch.

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    103 days ago

    A socialist corporation is still a corporation.

    Aka parasite

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      233 days ago

      They aren’t state owned, they’re the largest private company in China (by number of employees), and have had plenty of issues with the authorities there.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        63 days ago

        It is a legal entity incorporated under the laws of PRC lol

        It is a fiction of Chinese law with everything that entails

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        63 days ago

        A corporate entity sanctioned by the Communist part of China