This website contains age-restricted materials including nudity and explicit depictions of sexual activity.
By entering, you affirm that you are at least 18 years of age or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from and you consent to viewing sexually explicit content.
And yet you offer nothing to rebut the point. How is that not what you said? It seems spot on to me.
Persecution without explanation. Evil in one context (doubley evil, by association, even), accepted in another. I point out that incongruity.
How can I make it plainer?