Kentucky dispatchers repeatedly told police officers the address of a house they were supposed to raid over an alleged stolen Weed Eater, only for the cops to raid the wrong home and kill the man inside.

But the man who police say admitted to stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge had already been in custody prior to the deadly raid that took place minutes before midnight last month, according to WLEX. That man told police he had stored the stolen Weed Eater at a home at 489 Vanzant Road which is a rural area outside of London city limits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1272 months ago

    Check to see if there’s a development looking to buy all the land in that area. You know. Like the last time police did this, and it got buried for years until public outcry made the legal system reluctantly look into and find out there were very rich people who wanted the home of Brianna Taylor, and got it for what $1.00 after she was murdered in her bed by a cop who snuck behind the house to her bedroom and opened fire.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      672 months ago

      I found an article verifying the price, but do you have a source that connects the rest of the dots? I’m shocked (not that shocked) this isn’t on screaming front page headlines

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1092 months ago

    Why the fuck do they need to raid any house for a fucking weed eater!? That is serious small time shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      572 months ago

      And the thief was already in custody. He had “stored” the weed eater at the address they were supposed to be searching (er, raiding), meaning whoever would have been present there wasn’t even the thief.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      Because we train cops to kill and give them military surplus and they’re just itching to use it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      The whole raid and SWAT tactics are insanely ineffective and deadly. Before that detectives would just come by in the day time and knock and be like ‘we have a warrant’.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      fuckin’ misdemeanor shit, stealing something under $1000. This judge ordered his little goon squad to seek vengeance and retribution on anyone who would dare steal from someone of his stature. No warrant, doubt they even announced themselves as police. They killed a man over a fucking used weed whacker. Raided his home in the middle of the night and killed an innocent American citizen over fucking nothing.

      hey judge your cops just stole a mans life, you gonna go seek vengeance and retribution again?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    742 months ago

    They broke into his house, and he got a gun out. Which is one of the few times it is reasonable to brandish a weapon… And they use that as justification to kill him. Over a weed eater.

    The police don’t give a shit if someone steals your catalytic converter, your whole car, or all of your tools. But I guess if you’re a judge they will kill for your weed eater.

    • @iknowitwheniseeit
      link
      English
      382 months ago

      It was stolen from a judge. So the police treated it as important. You know, the same as when a rich person is harmed

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 months ago

        But they won’t. Qualified immunity, which means they can and will murder with impunity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 months ago

          They sow death so they deserve to reap death. Legality is not a factor in my proposition.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      A lot of people have proven self defense against police breaking into their home and attacking him. Legally speaking.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 months ago

    There is more to this story that we will never know. You raid a home over a stolen fucking weed eater. Gross abuse of power by someone

    • Subverb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 months ago

      No, it’s right there in the story. The weed eater belonged to a judge, so obviously someone’s gonna pay.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If only. Man, if only there were some Mario Bros that could handle something like this. They hate the forces of evil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      Even if it was the correct home. They killed the guy over a fucking weed eater. Even if he’d been violent back off and fucking let things cool down. Grab him when he goes for groceries or something. Fuck.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      I mean, the article plainly says that the weed eater belonged to a local judge.

      This dude wasn’t executed because of what he was accused of stealing. He was executed because of who he was accused of stealing it from.

      I can almost guarantee that some police higher-up is getting a free/cheap piece of “forfeited” property in the coming weeks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        The thief was in custody. They where just going to where the guy stashed it. Like why couldn’t they roll up in a patrol car and knock.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          I know, that’s why I said accused. The dude didn’t steal anything, but was still killed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    502 months ago

    stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge

    Aha, so that’s why they suddenly give a shit about property theft, because it was from a member of their little club.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What’s it’s matter about the address. We are talking about a weed eater. Chill the fuck out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ah, but the weed eater belonged to a judge. It wasn’t because he stole something valuable; It was because he stole from someone important.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        He didn’t steal anything they had the thief. It was a recovery operation. You know it’s dangerous getting a weed eater from someone who doesn’t know they have it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 months ago

      Why did they even do anything? Whenever something is stolen from I get told there is nothing they can do but take a report.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 months ago

        I’m sure “judges weed eater” had nothing to do with the enhanced police response. /s

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        Yeah, police are unwilling to do anything about vandalism in my neighborhood, smashed windows on homes and cars, 20+ smashed windows, everyone knows exactly who is doing it to the kid who goes around trying to jump kids in the area half their size and has been caught and witnesses red handed multiple times, ‘‘aww jeez guys, looks like… there’s nothing we can do…’’ useless.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            We all bought ring doorbells with the nifty "YOU HAVE ACTIVATED A CAMERA! YOU ARE BEING RECORDED!‘’ on it, and people must be turning in videos because they blanketed the whole area in ‘‘General Warning to everyone, you can be evicted if your children vandalize or break into any apartment used or not’’ which really feels like a lawyer recommended move to make sure they can point to something and say ‘‘see it’s the same rules for everyone and everyone was told not just that one family’’

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 months ago

      Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely) or they intentionally raided the wrong home as an excuse to kill this man, perhaps under judges orders.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 months ago

        Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely)

        did you mean to say incompetent? (genuine question)

      • Robust Mirror
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        When you can’t tell if police killed someone through staggering incompetence or deliberate malice… something is fundamentally wrong.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 months ago

    So police get to kill anyone over anything with the word ‘weed’ now? I can’t think of any other reason to raid the home for a fucking $300 item.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It belonged to a judge so they sent a death squad after it, and cops are so fucking stupid they didn’t realize the thief was already in custody. It’s either that simple or they wanted this man dead for another reason.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Is this the only profession that lets you make consistent fatal errors with impunity? I really can’t think of another.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 months ago

      A weed eater stolen from a judges home. Judges and cops worship each other. To cops its like someone stole god’s weed eater.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      Cops like to charge others for extra crimes when they eff something up, so now they will charge the guy who stole the weed eater from the judge with murder. And Kentucky has capital punishment…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 months ago

    This is a repeat post, so I’ll repeat one of my replies partially: I wouldn’t be surprised if a suddenly vacant lot wouldn’t suddenly be auctioned off to a cop’s relative in areas with a high predominance of this. Read up on civil asset forfeiture as well. In some places, cops are basically legalized mafias.

  • JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 months ago

    Why does the article give a street address??? Wtf?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    This happened in a state where the majority of residents (especially in these rural areas) feel everyone should be armed for protection. They are also overwhelmingly in favor of aggressive police tactics so when I see a rural man defending himself and being shot for it by police I can’t help but sigh. I mean, anyone with half a brain could see these situations coming. Do we really need to use swat teams for non violent property crimes?