• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    66 hours ago

    The trolls have organized, industrialized, and multiplied like cockroaches. They have also changed from a few phbb forum assholes posting to stir shit and bait people to agenda-driven agents of propaganda. They no longer subsist on lols from making people mad, they get paid money or tribal power.

    Also, F the victim blaming that, what…? People should sit back and let the trolls have it all? The fault isn’t with the individuals replying, it’s with the service provider that willingly accepts and pushes such activity for profit and engagement.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
    link
    fedilink
    45 hours ago

    Everyone acting like this is a problem with algorithms or whatever. Nah, algorithms have nothing to do with it. Humans are just this stupid and will follow their desire to be “right” even if it leads them off a cliff. I mean, Lemmy loves feeding trolls. No one on Lemmy seems to understand the concept of “block and move on” (not that I’m totally guilt-free, I love feeding trolls for the same reason I love feeding campfires).

    No one on Lemmy will just ignore the trolls. Quite honestly, I’m wondering if the Internet should adopt a new strategy: mock the troll-feeders. If you catch someone engaging with a troll, you start making fun of them for feeding it. Make it clear that’s why you’re mocking them. Then maybe they’ll grow a brain and stop feeding them (except intentionally, because that’s honestly kinda fun sometimes).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26 hours ago

    It’s because rich powerful people have realised that if you feed the trolls you can get them to do things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    491 day ago

    I’m so happy I was introduced to the 'net in the 90’s - when the mantra was “don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”

    It’s too bad that fell out of vogue.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    291 day ago

    I’m not sure if you can call them trolls if they’ve sincerely lost their grip on reality, and are a significant voting block.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    211 day ago

    Really nobody in the thread is going to talk about Kremlin disinformation campaigns? That’s absolutely part of it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16 hours ago

      I’m not convinced. I mean of course they’re doing it but it only needs to be tiny nudges here and there and someone will go off the deep end. We give the Kremlin too much credit for our own dysfunction

    • h6a
      link
      fedilink
      211 day ago

      Most people think the propaganda has some content they want you to believe, but in reality the propaganda has to just keep us arguing and fighting all day instead of using the magic of the internet for cooperation and personal growth by learning about all kinds of stuff and liberating our minds.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1842 days ago

    Except it’s not their fault. At least, not entirely. Every single fucking centralized social platform tweaks its content algorithm to drive engagement, and they found that the best way was to piss you off. They shove it in your face until you can’t help but say something to fight the unending flow of utter bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 day ago

      That’s true, though the simple solution is to not be on such platforms. You do not have to let them “shove it in your face until you can’t help it”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Sort of true, but the algorithm that Reddit-like platforms use is transparent and simple (it’s just based on likes and dislikes, and I think you can even look up the source for the sorting modes) and hence doesn’t directly try to feed you content that’d enrage you. I can just not read the posts about Musk and Trump, since I find most takes on the former bad and don’t care much about the latter. Meanwhile, on platforms like Twitter or Tiktok you are directly fed content out of some recommendation ML model trained on user engagement.

          (There’s also subtler differences. For example, on Reddit/Lemmy/etc, if you hate a post you can dislike it, which will generally make it show up less to people. But on, say, Tumblr, not only are there no dislikes, but if you are really hate a post you can only respond to it by reposting it, therefore spreading it further among your followers! That’s an absolutely devious platform-design move that could have been invented directly by Satan himself.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 day ago

            Agreed. On most social media websites the sorting algorithm is equivalent to sorting Lemmy/Reddit on controversial. Still I do think there are active parties on Reddit pushing rage bait, and it’s a problem that Hot instead of Best is the standard sorting algorithm on Reddit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 day ago

          all hail keyword filter blockers! nowadays i only see trumpet/muskat in posts that don’t mention their names in the title, and tbf i don’t mind staying a little informed on their latest pro-dystopia moves, but now it’s not as much a firehose of bullshit to my face every day all day, but an occasional squirt gun hit

          • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver
            link
            fedilink
            315 hours ago

            I have the same filters on. It does not lessen the fact that lemmy is obsessed with those two juggaloos.

            I believe that, their plan has always been to saturate the news so that people talked about them, always. So when time comes to vote, you go for the candidate you think you know best, a.k.a the one you didn’t stop hearing about.

            That, and the fact that people are saturated with your shenanigans, to the point that you can do anything stupid without people caring.

    • Malta Soron
      link
      fedilink
      352 days ago

      Block them or move to another platform. I block everyone on Facebook who feels the need to make negative comments, regardless of whether I expect to encounter them again. Really cleans up the place.

      • Zos_Kia
        link
        212 hours ago

        I have to keep my LinkedIn for business reasons but recently I noticed a big uptick in fascist-adjacent posting. At first it depressed me big time but then I started blocking and a couple weeks and dozen blocks later it was over. Turns out a small number of people can really give the impression of a crowd and fuck with the whole experience.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              82 days ago

              Yes!

              Ultimately it becomes troll v troll until either trolls out leaving each troll believing they’ve out-trolled the troll.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                51 day ago

                Alot of these places are just a spot were bots and racists can argue with each other. If only it were a capsule that we could shoot into the sun.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        132 days ago

        Imagine that there’s a paving slab that sticks out right outside of your house, often causing you to fall. If that’s the 50th time you fall over due to this thing, you probably will curse at it, no matter how emotionally mature you are.

        Now exchange falling over to being trolled.

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      Yeah, the landscape has changed a lot. People can also share on other platforms, sometimes live, showing their trolling. Poe’s law is also a thing. I first got online in the BBS days and have been around basically every since. I quit mainstream SNS years ago, but it even finds its way here.

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      12 days ago

      This happens on decentralized social media, too. Fedi dwellers are all so convinced that the trolls wouldn’t have happened without intervention and man, is that not true.

      Don’t get me wrong, the corpos used that dynamic for profit, but they didn’t invent it. Having been there before the algorithm, old forums, IRC and other protosocial spaces had very plump trolls, and so do federated, decentralized spaces when they reach critical mass.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        213 hours ago

        The trolls definitely exist here, too, for sure. But my point was that centralized social media algorithmically pushes it on you. Facebook, for example, goes out of its way to find ragebait to show you, whereas here, the trolls have to post somewhere you’re intentionally subscribed.

        • MudMan
          link
          fedilink
          19 hours ago

          No arugment there. I’m not questioning that corpos make the issue deliberately worse as an engagement engine. That’s a fact.

          But a lot of people jump from there to assuming those patterns will just vanish without algorithmic intervention, and that’s just not true, which can lead to a lot of disappointment when people move to other alternatives.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 day ago

    I think the default comment, even here, is “I disagree”.

    Folk have mistaken contraryism for discourse and argument for engagement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    272 days ago

    Kinda ironic considering how many people on here are completely unable to spot satire.

    Although Facebook is definitely worse for the amount of idiotic comments being made.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I find it’s less common to find insistent users who refuse to read provided sources, or provide sources of their own, on Lemmy than on Facebook. It happens, but far less frequently than when I last used Facebook in 2015. Although my perspective may have been unique to my curated feed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 day ago

        I think the smaller communities helps with giving eachother the benefit of the doubt. Like if I’m disagreeing with someone from my own insurance, or another small one I know is generally cool, I’ll try much harder to figure out what their point is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        The flip side of that is people who think sources can support an illogical argument. Sources: think tank think tank WaPo.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 days ago

    The reason it was the mantra back then was because there was always at least a few new people and people who were just kind of dull that simply didn’t get it and needed such a thing constantly repeated

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 day ago

      Like the mtg and bobert types. Like don’t you fucking say 9/11 don’t you fucking say Jewish space laser.

  • Lord Wiggle
    link
    fedilink
    192 days ago

    I kinda get it, but I also understand why it happens. People are outraged by how the world is being fucked up and they speak out. It’s resistance to Idiocracy. They may be feeding trolls but saying nothing is ignorant compliance. So claiming it’s their fault feels like victim blaming. Also, the amount of neuro diverse people is also growing. They, we, often don’t understand sarcasm and trolling and take too much seriously. And are triggered by things meant to be a joke.

    It’s funny how I reply seriously on this post. It’s like I’m inviting trolls to take me hard. I say: bring it! I brought lube.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      Yes, that’s why social media should I.) allow downvoting, ii.) use an algorithm that reduces the prominence of downvoted posts and iii.) actively remove bot accounts that attempt to game the voting system. Most social media do none of these things, and in fact push controversial takes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      There was a study done (can’t find it anymore) that said to respond once to clarify and then walk away.

      • Lord Wiggle
        link
        fedilink
        223 hours ago

        I wish I would be able to do that, but that goes entirely against my autism.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 day ago

      Lol yeah that’s what I was thinking. This is one of those posts where op thinks no one will notice they are trying to prove a point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 days ago

    Even back then, the largest a forum became the less likely it was for trolls to starve in it. What we’re seeing is just the continuation of that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 day ago

      This is a good point.

      I think “old internet” culture was unsustainable as it scaled up, even without algos fanning the flames.