This website contains age-restricted materials including nudity and explicit depictions of sexual activity.
By entering, you affirm that you are at least 18 years of age or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from and you consent to viewing sexually explicit content.
I don’t listen to hiphop, and this is the first I’m hearing about this.
This sounds pretty bad. And if UMG marketed it as much as the lawsuit claims, maybe he actually has a case.
And this actually resulted in a shooting and break-ins.
Dude is a pedo though…
If he lawyer says he’s not, then we have to believe him! /s
UMG didn’t market it, Drake himself did by voluntarily participating in the beef, even acknowledging early on it would probably be used against him (because there’s no shortage of creepiness). Drake has been throwing shots at basically everyone for a decade, this didn’t just pop up. So many people were ready for his downfall, that made it 100x more popular than UMG did.
Thanks for some background!
All of that is true, but I’m pretty sure that UMG did market it nevertheless. That happened after the release, not before it - but when the UMG executives realized what cultural phenomenon this song was, they definitely wouldnt let it just fizzle out organically.
He accused the other guy of beating his wife during the beef too. Lawsuit doesn’t mention that.
You’re right, fuck major labels for sure and this is more evidence supporting that, but fuck drake too that dude is a creep and he can fuck off