I have one outstanding order that is already out for delivery. Once I get that, I’m closing my amazon account. I’m done. Buy nothing. Vote with your wallet. Edit: account is closed. get bent Bozos.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    123 days ago

    Just goes to show how corporations actually feel about diversity and equality. They’re all racist, sexist and homophobic but they all write their policy to appear like they aren’t until they are allowed to show their true colours.

    • @DavidDoesLemmy
      link
      103 days ago

      Companies have no feelings. They just do whatever’s best for the bottom line.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      424 days ago

      more like mask flip season. they will implement it back with the same speed they unimplemented next time democrats take charge. I think one should collect all these news and keep them for four years so one can compare the news four years later side by side with these. that is if Trump doesn’t go full monarchy on USA’s ass

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 days ago

        No. It took literal decades to get those initiatives in place. They were implemented veeerry slowly and only because laws were passed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I wonder what makes the author of the article think that Bezos did this. The CEO of Amazon has been Andy Jassy since 2021.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 days ago

      Bezos is still Executive Chair on the board of directors, who Jassy reports to. Nothing controversial would be done without Bezos knowing.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 days ago

      I think its because the largest individual shareholder is still bezos. Shareholders elect the board, and the board appoints the CEO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        74 days ago

        We did but somehow they still want us to thank them for that being the start and end of their actions.

        I hope they don’t hold their breath on getting a thank you from everyone

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          214 days ago

          I’ve never asked for thanks nor have I seen even a single Lemming ask for thanks for their vote.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I’m not going to go out of my way for this conversation. Send me a link, otherwise I’ll keep an eye out during my usual browsing.

              Also, I think the fact that the comments you claim that you saw are in the political shitposting community should be a sign for you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 days ago

                I wasn’t really going to go find sources on that either and I realize the origin tells a lot, but every group in here is basically shitposting for something. It’s not an unheard of subsect.
                But, I was just continuing the conversation with where I have seen people acting like they have done the Biblical miracles for voting and that they therefore can’t be asked to do more. I tend to notice it cause my obvious aversion to it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      114 days ago

      Deleting LGBTQ policies is nothing compared to the slow drum of global warming that might wipe us out as a species.

      I tried to save y’all by advocating for third parties, who would actually bring in the same level of EO you’re seeing from Trump but instead to focus on education, military cuts, and moving towards green and nuclear

      • madjo
        link
        fedilink
        314 days ago

        Voting third party in a two party horse race is a fool’s errand. Especially if you voted for known Putin stooge Jill Stein, who was only running to steal away votes from Kamala Harris. She knew she didn’t stand a chance at winning.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Voting “third” party only fails because the great mass of fucking morons who insist on voting for the genocidal, global empire terrorist pieces of shit currently in charge. You can try as hard as you want to deflect that blame, but it will never wash off.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            204 days ago

            I like your sentiment, but a two party system inherently uses third party votes as spoilers. It is common for the dominate party to support a third party to peel away votes from their major opposition.

            https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo?si=6y_K1yvlvDPNxm70

            One solution to this is ranked voting. Of course many of our politicians recognize this and have already passed laws at the state level to bar ranked voting under the pretense that it is too confusing for voters.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 days ago

              Nailed it - I’ll consider a 3rd party vote on equal-footing once we have ranked/ranked choice voting in place. Right now, I think there’s a higher probability for one of the two parties to consider this so in other words… it’s going to be a while…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 days ago

                Whatever party is in power has a lot to lose from ranked voting and nothing to gain. This will make this reform very hard to pass. I live in Alaska and we have ranked voting that narrowly avoided a repeal this last year after passing the previous year.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              There is no legal enshrinement of a “two party system”. Whoever the public votes for wins. The public’s self-defeating mentality is the problem.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 days ago

                Not explicitly. Just effectively. Between first past the post, which naturally evolves into a two party system. And the electoral college which enshrines it. At the national level actual, independent 3rd parties are an impossibility. And they know it.

                Theoretically matter could spontaneously coalesce into a Boltzmann brain before a 3rd party could win a national election.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  FPTP doesn’t naturally evolve into a two-party system. Cultural predispositions cause that. The electoral college does not enshrine it, it - sometimes - hands the elector votes to the majority winner of the state, and some states even have legal pledges to follow other systems. There is no impossibility. I will repeat myself for the fiftieth time in this thread, THE PUBLIC’S SELF-DEFEATING MENTALITY IS THE PROBLEM. The public TELLS ITSELF a third party is an impossibility, the public DOESN’T VOTE FOR A THIRD PARTY. You will resign yourselves to slavery until you figure this out.

                • NSRXN
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 days ago

                  first past the post, which naturally evolves into a two party system

                  this isn’t true.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            54 days ago

            What’s the point of voting for a 3rd party when they have no members in Congress or the courts? They’d have to coalition with Republicans or Democrats anyways.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              74 days ago

              Exactly, it’s not like the president has all power (at least not yet, we’ll see where it is in a couple years). Without supporting members of the other branches, a third party president is nearly useless. That said, I’d take a useless but well meaning president over Trump.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                ^ This speaks to a lack of civics education. Without an overwhelming majority, Congress can’t pass harmful legislation with an executive veto, and the executive can still halt its implementation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Gridlock is better than streamlined totalitarianism. Vote for them in both. And courts weren’t really partisan before ~2010.

          • madjo
            link
            fedilink
            33 days ago

            With a “First Past The Post, Winner Takes All”-system like you have in the US, there’s virtually no chance of a third party winning an election, as the majority of the country haven’t even heard of your candidate, and thus won’t vote for it.

            And then still, once you get your third party elected president, then what? They’ll have to make huge compromises on their campaign promises in order to get anything done in Congress.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 days ago

              The public choosing to vote for a different party wins in a FPTP system regardless. The obstacle is the public.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 days ago

            Voting third party this election directly lead to a Trump win. “You can try as hard as you want to deflect that blame, but it will never wash off.”

            • NSRXN
              link
              fedilink
              23 days ago

              if everyone who voted for a so-called third party had voted for the democrat, trump still would have won.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 days ago

              Only in terms of “but this would have happened if you voted for something else”, the logic of which equally applies to the sum of Harris voters voting for somebody who, simultaneously, (a) had substantially less votes in the final outcome, but also (b) was so extremely evil that they’re complicit in a genocide. Or is that too hard for you to wrap your head around.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 days ago

        You’re a fool then. Voting for a third party has the exact same effect as not voting, and in this election, that effect was also supporting Trump. Get your head out of the fantasyland.

        People like you are part of the problem.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      “I tried to save you from the empire by voting for the empire”

      Honestly, fuck Americans and their insane discourse. Absolutely psychotic, delusional, brainwashed bullshit. You have NO fucking clue what is happening on this planet. This society is a plague on the world, just unleashing an endless series of massacres, and none of you even understand why.

      The fact that you would vote for someone complicit in genocide, without even figuring out WHY, and actually think you did something GOOD. My fucking god. And nobody reply to me with this “Trump would have been 5% worse” bullshit, because I’m done hearing it. You are not the heroes of the story. You’ve been indoctrinated to support “global military empire lite” with your fear of “global military empire original”. You sacrifice the lives of the victims of the empire for your illusion of democracy and quality of living, that never existed in the first place. Stop fucking patting yourselves on the back.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        144 days ago

        Brooooo, it’s not like any of us were thrilled with Kamala either. But in comparison to Trump I was excited for her.

        Trust me, we all get that both options weren’t optimal, but we don’t get an optimal option. We get 2 options, and one is usually better than the other. If we keep picking the better one, over time things improve.

        People like you tend to protest by not voting at all, or voting third party (which is essentially the same under our current structure). If we had compulsory voting, I highly doubt Trump would have won.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          53 days ago

          The problem is it’s not a choice between good and better, it’s a choice between bad and worse. We’re hitting the point where the lesser of two evils choices are hitting critical mass.

          • ObliviousEnlightenment
            link
            fedilink
            12 days ago

            Just bad is still lesser evil. Exactly how the fuck are we supposed to do better than that in an FTTP system? And to be quite frank, Im trying to avoid genocide at home

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            53 days ago

            Aside from not taking a firm stance on Israel, I didn’t have any huge problems with Kamala. I figured she was just holding back on criticism since AIPAC has the power to essentially end careers. That’s probably too optimistic.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              “Figured”, “probably” - these are not the levels of certainty you should have on your conclusions regarding a genocide.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                23 days ago

                Considering I was absolutely certain trump would make it worse, I was okay with mild uncertainty.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Let me rephrase it. You are not meeting the standards of research required to effectively participate in a democracy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Trust me, we all get that both options weren’t optimal, but we don’t get an optimal option. We get 2 options, and one is usually better than the other. If we keep picking the better one, over time things improve.

          People like you tend to protest by not voting at all, or voting third party (which is essentially the same under our current structure). If we had compulsory voting, I highly doubt Trump would have won.

          No single drop of water blames itself for the flood. There are 240 million eligible voters, who all have the choice, collectively and individually, to vote for ANYONE. Somehow you are all completely incapable of blaming the entire group for its continual decisions to vote for war criminals and genociders. Rather, you completely invert the blame onto those who DON’T vote for those people. Literally, you ignore the blame for the only people actually responsible, and instead blame the only people NOT responsible. Given the massive efforts to brainwash the public regarding this political system, it’s nearly impossible to not see this as a product of brainwashing as well, because this self-defeating pattern completely neuters any attempt for real political change.

          By the way, the Senate just voted 99-0 to confirm Marco Rubio. Including Bernie Sanders, Van Hollen, Booker, Warren, every Democrat. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00008.htm Explain that to me once you get done explaining how the Democrats are really the underdog opposition.

          Trust me, we all get that both options weren’t optimal, but we don’t get an optimal option. We get 2 options, and one is usually better than the other. If we keep picking the better one, over time things improve.

          Also, no, they fucking don’t. The system presenting you with these manufactured options continually clamps down its chokehold on the world as you continue on in your delusion of political choice. It absolutely boggles my fucking mind how after a year and a half of open genocide you think there’s some kind of autonomy between the Democrats and Republicans.

          • ObliviousEnlightenment
            link
            fedilink
            12 days ago

            Do you not understand how FTTP works? Theres too many liberals who genuinely want empire lite, trying to make an actual progressive happen outside the party would just split the left-of-trump vote

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              There is no solution for a population voting incorrectly than for them to correct their behavior. You have no point.

              • ObliviousEnlightenment
                link
                fedilink
                119 hours ago

                Well there’s a few, but encouraging them would get me banned. Unfortunately, most peoppe are NPCs, robots made of gore who act entirely in accordance with natural instinct and emotion, you have to politic around that or nothing will get done

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        So, the choices were donvict or Biden/Kamala. That’s it. You don’t have to like it (and I certainly don’t), but that’s just reality.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Your depiction of “the choices” is factually incorrect. The population had the ability to run with any candidate whatsoever. You “chose” (or rather, were handed) two war criminal psychopaths to vote for.

          You are in a prison of your own creation.

          • ObliviousEnlightenment
            link
            fedilink
            12 days ago

            The not-republicans are a coalition of actual progressives and diet imperialism. Working outside the parry just splits the vote

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 days ago

            He lost the primary fair and square. And because unlike many of his voters he could acknowledge this. He worked with the party to make those primary elections even more democratic in the future. Bernie actually got shit done. Unlike the people performing outrage he doesn’t feel on his behalf. Actively working against Sanders accomplishing anything through the Democratic party. Because they didn’t like the parties primary election rules which were changed because of Sanders.

            To borrow a phrase from Gandhi. I like your Bernie. I do not like your Bernie bros. Your Bernie bros are so unlike your Bernie.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 days ago

              I’m talking about throwing everything against him when he was the best for the job, unlike Hillary.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 days ago

          How about “I’m the only one of you actually judging this godforesaken system objectively, by its merits, which are nonexistent”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            33 days ago

            LOL, we live in a society that celebrates never maturing and the goal of every post since these types were on reddit, is to say something witty that continues to confirm to the zeitgeist and not push against anything.

            I don’t expect any better from them even though I would certainly like to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I can’t.
          It requires the person who thinks they were saving everyone else (assuming y’all wasn’t referring to queers and blacks specifically) by voting and that they can hold it over others to delete it or a mod to.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 days ago

              Right, so no response so this is my point. It’s just a conformist shout to show to everyone else that you have heard someone else say it to someone before.

              It’s not clever it doesn’t hurt, I understand the response I will get when I say something controversial. Wishing others get help makes it seem like only people you like are rationally minded and people that may not be mentally well are rude which is diminishing to them.

              Really just, insult for the moment at least right? Don’t be lazy is at the core of my point and this is exactly that.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 days ago

                  Conformity through repeating phrases you think make you sound better is a waste of everyone’s time even to the person they think they are “helping” by saying get help.

                  I said something controversial and there was controversy? I expect that. My point is to try to convey my opinion anyways cause I don’t care about being silent for decorum.

                  If you don’t understand my actual words then that’s just unfortunately a common flaw of communicating.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Whatever help is necessary to stop you from replying twice 2 hours apart to a comment on the internet. Log off.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 days ago

                  I was replying to another comment on this chain at the time and it was a point I wanted to make. It’s a forum where all we have are the messages we write to convey our point. So, no I’m alright. I do log off and do other things that’s also my point.

                  People take the Internet too seriously.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Wait, rainbow capitalism wasn’t sincere?
    I left the Amazon ecosystem a couple of years ago because fuck Bezos and it wasn’t a big deal, really. Accumulating stuff is a mindset I could reason myself out of. I call it the power of No, thank you. I buy mostly second hand now and it’s so calming. Saves me money as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 days ago

        because saying 0-10% 11%-20% 21%-30% 31%-40% 41%-50% 51%-60% 61%-70% 71%-80% 81%-90% 91%-100% would create a label so fucking long.

        It’s implied that each grouping is the top 10% and bottom 10% of each 20% range, to me anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        104 days ago

        Probably lazy graphing. I think they’re trying to illustrate the difference between top 10 and 20 percent, then threw the others in as collective 20 percent bands. Pie chart might have been better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 days ago

        to be more similar to the 10% 20% categories I would guess. the bottom 50% could probably be lumped together and it wouldn’t change much of anything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      I wonder where the line of being able to afford food and housing would be in each graph and what is the percent of people bellow that. I think that’s the important factor signifying how desperate people really are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Personally I think graph is pretty egregious as long as we have a homeless or poverty problem to discuss, regardless of where the line of desperation is. We know people are under it, and not just a few. Not to mention the high percentage of middle class that are a paycheck or two from being unhoused.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 days ago

          Don’t get me wrong - I know there are many desperate people now. I’d just like to see the comparison to pre-revolution France to see just how similar the situation really is based on hard data.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    414 days ago

    Don’t worry guys, all these corporations will bring back those pretty rainbow logos for Pride Month™ and all will be forgotten.

    • bountygiver [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      223 days ago

      except this will be the start of the year they stop doing that, because now it becomes the “popular” side to not support it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      73 days ago

      Oh, you know trump will issue an EP revoking Pride Month, and all the businesses will forget about it. It makes me sick.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    333 days ago

    Okie-dokie.

    I guess I can delete “slow down if I see Jeff Bezos crossing the street” from my policies.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 days ago

    Just last night I was going through all my subscribe and save items and finding alternatives. I stored them in a spreadsheet (LibreOffice). My last order is already in motion and once delivered that’s it. Amazon is gone.

    Other changes I’ve made or am in the process of making:

    • FB + IG -> PixelFed
    • Reddit -> Lemmy (lemm.ee)
    • X -> BlueSky
    • Tesla hasn’t been on my wish list for a while -> Rivian or another alternative… wish I could say Xiaomi
    • YouTube -> PeerTube, LibreTube, piped.video, invidious

    Where I’m stuck and looking for help: What do I do for my next phone? Android and Apple are both at the table supporting this mess. Linux alternatives seem like huge downgrades at the moment… any advice?

    • Let's Go 2 the Mall!OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 days ago

      I’ve closed almost every account as well. I like Bluesky and PixelFed so far. As far as phones go, I’m just going to keep my same Android for now. It’s old and I will not upgrade until I have to. I use fdroid for everything. I though of switching to Apple, but as you said, they are kissing the ring too. Sad times.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        Anything samsung galaxy phones? I got a later model and don’t know if I can get anything other than the stock program.

        • Sol 6 VI StatCmd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 days ago

          to my knowledge there’s not a lot available for samsung hardware at the moment, maybe check out sailfish?

        • Sol 6 VI StatCmd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 days ago

          I don’t have any experience with Lineage so I don’t want to speak to it. May just be hardware dependent in a lot of cases. I had a pixel when I got sick of googles shit and Graphene was the only option for me, so that’s what I sprung for. The experience has been very positive - installation was easy - the fresh start was welcome.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        That’s a good idea. Keep in mind that you can also install other OSs on a FairPhone: LineageOS, iodéOS, CalyxOS (unfortunately not GrapheneOS). A FairPhone can be a good hardware choice, and with it you still have the ability to choose an OS.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 days ago

          I might actually try to install on my existing Android Fairphone.i have been very lazy the last few years in terms of installing Linux on my desktop and hacking around with stuff. I was also considering Sailfish but I think E/OS / Murena is the way to go.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 days ago

        Wow - that looks like a very solid option!! I’m very interested… this may be my next phone! Thank you so much!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      With android you can avoid the google play store so they don’t get a cut of ad revenue. I don’t know whether Google gets a cut of phones they didn’t manufacture just because Android is on it, considering Android is open source and the manufacturers are responsible for updates.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 days ago

        I’m using f-droid now. A quick search shows Google makes money via play store and having some of their apps as default (to sell ads) – so maybe that will still work for me. I’ll dig in further. Thank you!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 days ago

          Just send an SMS, it’s not the end of the world

          Alternatively, the next usual Lemmy suggestion is too isolate yourself and lose those friends

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 days ago

            Vast majority of my friends are communicating via Signal. So far the best option looks to be to use/install a version of android that cuts out the google stuff. F-droid for apps to avoid $ from play store while also avoiding $ from ads.

          • People with social media don’t realize, they’ve already lost those friends. You’re keeping up with them superficially at best. If you quit the platform, chances are you will not notice that you’re no longer so superficially keeping up with them, you will not hear from them, and they will not notice either. Anyone that you actually want to keep in touch with, you can send a message through text, or call.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      maybe it helps your conscience but it’s not going to affect any of these massive corporations. it won’t make a dent in their revenue and they will go on oblivious to your ‘protest’. if you want to make a difference, the only way is [redacted]. when are ya’ll gonna figure this out?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        If enough people do this, it will certainly make a dent exactly where they don’t want it to. I may be wrong, but I do believe it’s possible to reach critical mass. With that said, it also helps my conscience at the same time. I won’t comment on the other part other than it’s already been figured out and demonstrated. Best I’m willing to do personally is voting with my wallet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          you need to see big picture. it’s not republicans that got shit done with weapons, it’s how 96% of human history was decided. this time is no different.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    70
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    We won’t survive this.

    But if we did, it would be my greatest wish that everyone understands this was all brought to you by tolerance of Greed and capitalism.

    Greedy people are a blight on humanity and mentally ill in a serial killer, society must be protected from them way.

    But unfortunately, since most here still see themselves as temporarily embarrassed millionaires that don’t want to be part of society but live above it, they’ll blame everything but. In that respect, maybe my first point is a silver lining.

    • GladiusB
      link
      fedilink
      74 days ago

      Greedy people didn’t survive the French Revolution. Just saying.

        • GladiusB
          link
          fedilink
          23 days ago

          He did die in isolation in a prison on an island. Kinda doubt that counts as “winning” the greed lottery.

          He did exploit the situation. But some shit needed to get done to get where it went.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 days ago

      Maybe someday I’ll be a millionaire. Hopefully it won’t be at the same time a loaf of bread is $100 and a million dollars is poverty.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    424 days ago

    Oh yeah, by all means, stop using all Amazon related services, then realize that about 50% of web services for banking, agriculture, logistics, infrastructure, telecommunications, research and development, industry, transportation, healthcare and energy are hosted on AWS

    “Oh but my service is hosted on GCP”

    Yeah and what do you think is the fallback in case of DRP?

    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      284 days ago

      I mean we can all do our small part. 🤷‍♂️ Something is better than nothing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 days ago

        No, they’re totally right and should continue to spend every dollar they earn on Amazon while bemoaning the death of small businesses.

        • Victor
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          I… don’t understand this. It’s like it’s only 50% sarcasm somehow.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      164 days ago

      Yes AWS is the standard for most of the internet, but do you think Amazon won’t notice if a whole bunch of users en masse decide to stop buying things from their warehouses?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 days ago

        Oh the users win DEFINITELY notice when the second order effects of pulling out of current infraestructure without a plan just for dubious ideological reasons start to manifest

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 days ago

            My dude, that is literally the least profitable part of their business and not the one I’m talking about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They have much more built out offerings, but smaller hosting providers and on-premise are always an option regardless. Obviously not including “Azure”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          Good then that loads never change, growth never happens, users never drop off your platform, demand is always the same and everything related to users is never dynamic, but static as fuck

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 days ago

            Yes. That is exactly what some B2B customers want. You can still grow month to month, and adapt your onprem infrastructure accordingly.

            Obviously this approach is extremely dependent on the underlying use case and business model. Unlikely to be suitable for B2C.