• Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      While I do not think that Aliens was a bad film at all, I kinda wish it wasn’t a sequel to Alien. It’s a completely different film, far more action-oriented

      Then again my view is probably significantly coloured by the fact that I enjoyed the first one a lot more

      • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s one of the reasons it’s so good. Alien is perfect space horror. Aliens doesn’t try to match it but tells a different kind of story with some of the same characters.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think that’s the fun of the movie. It’s not trying to recapture the suspense or tension of the original. It’s a natural evolution in a world of monsters. In the first movie, the crew are just people trying to survive on a ship in space with a terrifying novel threat. Any other monster movie sequel, they find new victims and run it back, but the characters in Aliens react as one should to a new threat. Gear up and go at them with soldiers and weapons.

        It’s still terrifying because you and they know what lurks in the wet shadows. They are prepared to fight it which is why it’s an action movie, but it’s still very much an Alien sequel.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh I agree that it is an Alien sequel, I’m just saying I wish it hadn’t been. For me, it kinda cuts down on the dread that the xenomorph can create when there are dozens of them charging into a hail of automated machine gun fire and getting slaughtered.

          I don’t think that they actually executed it very well, but I am far more keen on the ideas brought about in Prometheus and Covenant. That’s what I personally want out of Alien sequels. Just ideally with, like… a second look over the script. By anyone.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not sure about that, actually. There’s a similar power dynamic involved — Arnie’s terminator is unstoppable compared to Kyle Reese, but then the T-1000 is unstoppable compared to Arnie. Worse, it can now be anyone in almost any scene

          Terminator 3, on the other hand…

          • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a completely different film, far more action-oriented

            Terminator 2 is tonally almost completely different from 1. 1’s soul is much more a horror movie, complete with a damsel in distress and a heavily uncanny villain. 2 had every chance to lean into that sense of unease, but really doesn’t explore that uncomfortable emotion despite the T-1000 being much more threatening on paper.

            • Skua@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ll take your word for it; it has been a long time since I’ve watched either of them, so my memory of the tone is probably not on the money

      • Che Banana@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which (IMHO) is the reason it works so well. The first movie can’t be topped because we’ve seen the Alien and the tension can’t be repeated (see: the later movies which try this same formula and fail). Aliens takes that and ramps it up in a different way to make the desperation of escaping with firepower on your side still nerve wracking!

        The 3rd installment also takes a new twist and different approach but doesn’t succeed as well (I still found it enjoyable, and rewatch from time to time.

        Everything since then has been a cash grab of hot garbage.

      • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t have the fear of the Alien and the tension from Ripley without the first movie… in my view, but yes it is a totally didn’t feeling movie otherwise.

  • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    Empire Strikes Back.

    And if you’re into “it’s so bad it wraps around and becomes hilarious” films, Troll 2.

  • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    People who grew up with the original will probably flay me for this.

    Bladerunner 2049 was a better movie than Bladerunner. It took everything that was great about the original and improved upon it.

    • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The original is a masterpiece. That said, I loved the sequel and have rewatched it multiple times. However, I don’t know if it is because I love the film or just anything Ryan Gosling is in 🤤😅

          • Zozano@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Certainly my favourite Gosling film. It’s one of those movies with a lot of ambiance; if you watch it, don’t doomscroll at the same time.

            The elevator scene is so beautiful.

            • Ilandar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              if you watch it, don’t doomscroll at the same time.

              It’s sad that you actually felt the need to tell people this in a movies community. What a time we live in.

              • Zozano@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not everyone is a cinephile, and some people like watching movies in the background.

                I can’t stand this attitude personally, and when I sit down to watch a movie with someone, I get annoyed when they don’t pause for getting a drink, or do something on their phones.

                If it was a movie like Deadpool, I can tolerate it, people can listen to the jokes, but put their phones down during action.

                Then there are movies which would be a downright mistake to become distracted. This is one of those movies IMO.

                • Ilandar@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t tolerate it at all, to be honest. I think it’s a complete joke how acceptable blatant phone addiction has become in society; a third of my sessions at the cinema have people using phones during the film now. There is no such thing as “watching in the background” - you’re either watching it or you’re not watching it. You can put a film on in the background but don’t tell me you watched it, because you didn’t. It’s such a widespread problem now that there has even been debate about whether some modern writers are instructed to dumb down their dialogue so that people who refuse to look up from their dopanime injector can follow the basic plot.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The first movie I saw with Gosling was Lars and the Real Girl. I didn’t get his appeal then, but I do now. I should watch that movie again because as weird as that movie is, I think his performance is stellar.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Old school fan here, from the 80s. I’m just dandy with this take.

      Probably never been more nervous about a sequel to a beloved movie. I was praying and praying, please god don’t let them fuck this up. But how could they possibly follow one of the top 5 most popular science fiction movies of all time?

      Well, Villeneuve knocked it out the fucking park. I was sold from the first scene with Bautista. Sold. Enough call backs and fan service to put us in the world without being obvious and ingratiating. Damned fine line to walk.

      Entire cast rocked out, too many props to write down. Yes, Leto was a little over-the-top, but he was supposed to be. Richest man in the world, totally disconnected from his humanity, and humans. And they got Olmos and Ford back! Perfect.

      Got to see it with my ex-wife, no one else in the theater. What a grand experience. If it ever comes back to the big screen, I’ll not skip it.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I had never seen the original until right before watching the sequel. While I really appreciate the original, I had no real expectations from the sequel, but it still blew me away.

        I honestly can’t say I’ve ever seen a better sequel. Especially not so long after the first one came out. It’s pretty amazing.

    • Ilandar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I guess I will need to rewatch 2049 again (I’ve only seen it once, in the cinema at release). I’ve watched the original quite a few times since though and I’m increasingly of the opinion that it’s quite overrated and gets heavily carried by the visuals and the soundtrack, so I could see a case being made for the sequel being better.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The visuals and soundtrack are a major part of any movie. And yeah, the original rocks out on both.

      • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The story / writing is pretty bold too. It’s nothing new by modern standards, but it was probably relatively novel in 1982.

  • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think there’s a better movie sequel than Terminator 2. It’s the reason why it’s still an ongoing franchise today.

    Would people still watch the first Terminator if it wasn’t for Terminator 2?

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      The first one is still a great movie. It’s biggest hindrance is the low quality stop frame animation when Arnold is just the skeleton. I wish they would re-release it with the fan made improvements to the stop motion that have been done.

    • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like Terminator 1 a lot more than T2.

      It’s much more grim-dark with horror elements. I would even go as far as saying there are subtle cyberpunk motifs in T1. There is also a modicum of character development. Michael Biehn (Kyle Reese) does a great job.

      T2 feels more like a teen’s summer action movie in comparison. It lacks that edge and is overly sentimental.

      I will note that growing up I liked T2 a lot more than T1.

  • ooli2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Mad max 1 was a revenge cop story nobody watched outside Australia

    Mad max 2 was the apocalyptic Mad max everybody know

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Godfather II. The first is honestly kind of hokey and people are really stupid when they are trying to be clever. GF II has higher levels of tension and the execution of everything is smarter. And Robert DeNiro just slays playing young Marlon Brando.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t think of any. It’s hard to be a better sequel than the greatest action movie of all time is.

    If I had to pick, I would say The Empire Strikes Back.

  • Foni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was going to say terminator3 but then I realized you were serious.

    I’ll have to say Escape from L.A. It is not usually mentioned and I think it is better than the first part

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      ? Interesting take. Haven’t watched either for a decade or two. You got me thinking…

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hate on Michael Bay and his Transformers movies all you want, but there is only one movie with more robots that turn into more things than cars, more explosions, more ridiculous destruction, more awesomeness, more movie than 2007’s Transformers, and that movie is Transformers: Age of Extinction.

    A giant robot that turns into a semi-truck painted with red flames, wielding a sword while riding on the back of another giant robot that turns into a flame-breathing T-rex robot. It’s unparalleled in the stupid dumb action movie genre.