• Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Right, but that requires, you know, amending the Constitution. Which requires 3/4 of the states sign on. 3/4 of the states are not going to sign on to throwing out the 2nd Amendment. 2/3 of states wouldn’t sign on to that. I don’t think you could even get 1/2 of the states to sign on to that.

      Especially because no Republican is going to vote for it, and neither is anyone representing a rural area. And we’re talking state legislatures, and Dems aren’t great at expanding their influence in state legislatures.

        • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Is there a threshold of sensationalism of such events that changes the number of states required to ratify the thing? That would change the number of supporting Congressional members?

          I’m amazed you still believe this is feasible despite the lack of support for such a measure.