Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, after he suggested her “Know Your Rights with ICE” webinar could be illegal.

The event informed immigrants about their rights during ICE raids. Homan claimed the webinar might impede immigration enforcement and said he was working with the DOJ to determine legal action.

AOC dismissed his remarks, stating, “Maybe he can learn to read. The Constitution would be a good place to start.”

She continues to oppose Trump’s immigration policies, including efforts to revoke birthright citizenship.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        156 days ago

        The Dems definitely need someone with a bite in that position. AOC would be a good choice, indeed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        96 days ago

        Dems would need a majority first. Then they’d have to agree to get rid of Jeffries (who has only been Minority Leader at this point and unlikely to let go without a fight).

        I swear, this site is full of people who have no fucking clue how US politics works in the real world.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          266 days ago

          I want a sandwich! Fuck, that would mean I would have to go get bread, cheese and other fixings. Guess I can’t have a sandwich because I know how making lunch works in the real world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            56 days ago

            No, it would be more like “I want a sandwich, but I have no idea what a sandwich actually is”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          More like Dems need to stop self sabotaging themselves for fear of not appeasing their corporate masters. Everytime a good dem candidate that is actually for the people gets popular they get ousted because they are actually “left” not center right.

          I’d take democratic any day though compared to hard Reich maga shitheads

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          66 days ago

          “I swear, this site is full of people who have no fucking clue how US politics works in the real world.”

          My take away is that non-USians seem to understand politics better; generally. I know that’s a gross generalisation but the amount of US people who think “team blue” is both liberal and left wing is just sad…

          • ObliviousEnlightenment
            link
            fedilink
            36 days ago

            Its true a lot of us arent the most politically educated, but that ones not an example. “Liberal” in an American context is usually referring to social liberalism, not economic. Using it in an economic sense doesnt make sense in a country where public healthcare is on the furthest left end of the overton window

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              16 days ago

              But on the WORLD wide web nobody should default to one country’s erroneous understanding of a word.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 days ago

          Let me tell you how this little game works in the real world.

          Since you mention “Dems would need a majority first”. That is a large part of the act. These ‘progressives’ will criticise, oppose and more virtue signaling without doing anything. They propose bills knowing they will never pass. When they control everything, they simply stop proposing them. When they have to vote, they tow the party line. At least some eyes were opened when she endorsed Biden’s genocide. (Not the first time she defended US/zionist warcrimes OC) She will cry “concentration camps” when Trump opens child immigrant dentention facilities. But when Joe opens them, suddenly she calls them “influx facilities”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            When they control everything, they simply stop proposing them. When they have to vote, they tow the party line.

            And this is based on…?

            Right you just made it up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        177 days ago

        That took me entirely too long. I had to question why the hell you took a picture of your computer looking at this post. Presumably from your phone, which you presumably uploaded the picture from, instead of just taking a screenshot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 days ago

        I don’t like genocide supporters. Or kids in jail. Or union- strike busters Warmongers and regime chance advocats.

  • BaldProphet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1217 days ago

    How can the “free speech” party so consistently get it wrong when it comes to the First Amendment?

      • Tarquinn2049
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yeah it’s “I want people to stop acting like I’m a jerk when I say mean things”, “but I also want them to not be able to say mean things about me, cuz that isn’t fair to me”. And yes, it should sound like a toddler having a temper tantrum. Including a complete misunderstanding of the entire concept of fairness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      216 days ago

      “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      157 days ago

      Ahh…see…there’s the rub…your answer is literally the first word of the first amendment.

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

      Congress ain’t doing shit. Executive unitary theory means the Constitution is about as legally binding as a Dear Abby letter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    857 days ago

    She needs to keep going. She needs to speak to them the same way they speak to everyone else. She needs to use every bit of her position to mother fuck these cowards at every turn. Call them out, and show their ignorance every single fucking time and in every single fucking forum.

    She needs to demand her coworkers do the same. She needs to shame them when they don’t or when they compromise. The time for pleasantries is long past.

    If she does, others will follow, but it will be dangerous, so I understand if she just keeps doing what she is doing. It is at least miles more than most of them.

    Bla bla bla, man shouts at clouds, but no one listens.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      147 days ago

      You’re right. She’s the only one or at most one of less than a handful of Democrats that are actually DOING something with their platform to resist the fascists, rather than just doing rousing speeches for the cameras, fundraising emails and fuckall else.

      If the Dem leadership were more like her, even if they retained the same crappy Neoliberal policy positions, things would never have gotten anywhere near this bad in the first place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    347 days ago

    I’ve always wonder why the US uses a title from Imperial Russia to refer to the heads of special activity like drug czar and border czar. No seriously, any ideas why?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      247 days ago

      It’s a term that indicates a leader, and its origins are thousands of years before imperial Russia.

      It’s a derivative of the Latin “Caesar”, and many cultures have used the term (or its derivatives) to indicate a leader. Pre-Weimar Germany was led by the Kaiser, a German adaptation of the title.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          It’s also the shortest and most easily recognizable, which is most likely why it caught on. The fact that it’s a Russian/Slavic derivative is probably just coincidence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      86 days ago

      This is relatively new, it started with Obama I believe. It was sort of a joke that went non-ironic at some point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87 days ago

      It’s an unofficial title given to those empowered to make broad decisions for US, UK, and even Canadian policy.

      • The Quuuuuill
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 days ago

        still weird, and still tied to a bloodstained legacy for many americans of eastern european legacy

        • Em Adespoton
          link
          fedilink
          87 days ago

          That’s part of the reason. It used to be done as a reminder to use the power responsibly.

          In the US, it has somehow morphed into something more literal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 days ago

      It’s one of those projecting things the conservatives like to do. It’s stupid, and needs to stop imo.

    • frustrated_phagocytosis
      link
      fedilink
      67 days ago

      I always assumed it was derogatory because I only heard it used on Fox News* in reference to Democratic cabinet members.

      *Not watching it voluntarily, my idiot parent has hearing loss and has the TV on full volume whenever I visit. The Fox logo is literally burned into the TV.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    307 days ago

    don’t start a war of words with someone infinitely more intelligent than you are, mr homan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 days ago

      His name sounds like he’s a ferengi from star trek. “Listen here, female hoo-man”. Kinda makes sense, they are like ferengi.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What happened to the immigrants they were hauling off to Guantánamo Bay? Has there been an update on that?

    • Lukas Murch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 days ago

      MAGA, “what is this, Arabic? This is America! Write in English.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    35 days ago

    Maybe AOC should tell her illegal aliens in her district on how to legally enter the country rather than to hide from ICE

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Get the fuck out of here. AOC has been the only politician that I truly believe is fighting for the american people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      135 days ago

      If they are already in the country then it would be pointless to describe how to enter the country.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 days ago

          The guy who brought the war crime of parental separation from children to US policy. Why do you think that ruining children’s lives, who would otherwise be raised in families, cared for and loved, literal babies torn from their mother’s breast, is a good thing? And for what? Money? This policy is the most expensive way of doing anything, and removing immigration negatively impacts the country both as a collective and as per capita, so it’s purely just ideological cruelty on an arbitrary group of people.

          Secondly, the guy is a proven outright liar, who frequently quotes false and made up statistics, loves to joke about women getting raped, and regularly collaborates with listed hate groups.

          Why not appoint a competent, truthful person who truly cares about helping America than someone actively trying to hurt both America and Americans?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 days ago

            Illegal aliens aren’t Americans, and should have sought legal ports of entry.

            Family separations started under President Obama as well.it is not a war crime, as we’re not at war, however it is framed that way. It’s more of a crime to traffick kids to another country, is it not? To endanger their lives trekking across a desert, wading through a river and climbing an 18 ft wall when all they had to do was walk to a point of entry?

            You care more about these illegal aliens than the starving homeless American kids and then wonder why there’s divisiveness in our country.

            In case you’re deliberately missing the point, they’ve been going after illegal aliens with a criminal history, and you can’t blame Trump when they make bad decisions.

            Jokes about women getting raped? So Laken Riley was a joke to you? Did you purposely miss the point just because you hate Trump so much? Is it ok for people to break our laws just out of your disdain for Trump?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              illegal aliens aren’t Americans

              not my point. I meant hurt Americans by increasing food and cost of living expenses, reduction in farming workforce, loss of tax revenue meaning increased taxes on the poorest

              edit: not to mention the social cost of witnessing raids, which are generally pretty unpopular when witnessed in person or to someone you know

              “started under Obama”

              by the very self same person you just lauded as doing good thing

              “it’s not a war crime because we’re not at war”

              we are at war. America has been at war 228 out of 245 years (in before “its only congress that can declare war and they haven’t done that since ww2!” so the war in Iraq was not a war etc)

              But also, the technical definition of war does not mean destroying families is suddenly a good thing lol

              it’s more of a crime to traffick kids

              That’s not what human trafficking is, and it’s disingenuous to suggest it is. And the solution to human trafficking is not to further traffick the victims, which is the solution here.

              trekking across a desert… climbing a wall

              this is a fantasy and for the most part is statistically insignificant to illegal immigration. Most people drive or fly into America, and do so legally. The illegal part occurs when their paperwork expires and, as you can imagine, it is then incredibly difficult to a) reup or b) remove persons for both sides. It’s hard for the person in question because of all the barriers to entry, but also they moved to the US legitimately, and now the barriers exist only to make continued life more difficult, further compounding the situation; and, it’s hard for the government because there simply isn’t the resources to track expiry dates let alone action deportation on the back of them.

              you care more about x than y

              How do you know what I care about? This conversation does not have the scope to list and stack rank an exhaustive list of all the things I care about, but you are welcome to go first.

              Secondly, many of the starving homeless Americans are children of 1stG immigrants, whose lives are made worse by these policies.

              Laken Riley is a joke to you?

              A) when did I say that?

              b) Google the numbers on who commits more violent crime - spoiler not only do immigrants commit less crime, and less severe types, but they also have an effect of reducing crime amongst Americans in their community

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 days ago

      Yeah! At the local monthly illegal alien meeting! Durrr.

      Here’s a question for you, if we have a 4th amendment, why do we have to deal with cops just knocking on doors asking for papers without a warrant? My time has no value? Can I bill them my hourly consultant rate?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 days ago

        Durrrr don’t rape and kill when you’re an illegal alien and maybe Tom Homan won’t find you. DURRR

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    106 days ago

    “on her X social media account” “hosted on her Facebook page.”

    This person is part of the establishment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      146 days ago

      I’m not saying you’re wrong, but for instance If all my local justice and climate groups moved to masto they would effectively cease to exist.

      Would love it if people with the capability would post to both, though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        36 days ago

        It’s possible that you’re right. It’s also possible that people would follow those groups to Mastodon.

        It’s very possible that people would follow AOC to Mastodon as well. There’s no reason she can’t post on Mastodon as well and see how it goes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 days ago

        Every serious group already moved to mastodon and we are talking on lemmy. She has million of followers already and isn’t even trying, she’s part of the establishment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      106 days ago

      Social media contributes to the polarization of public discourse and should absolutely be boycotted. However, this polarization manifests in various ways, and your comment is a good example of this. When everything becomes a purity test, we fall into extremism. To counter the rise of fascism, you must be willing to unite with those who do not share your opinions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 days ago

        you must be willing to unite with those who do not share your opinions.

        To counter the rise of fascism you don’t use the private social media of a guy who does the nazi salute in public.