AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 days agoAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up11.19K
arrow-up11.19KimageAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldAMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 days agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squareInternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·28 days agoRobot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
minus-squareIoughttamow@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up27·28 days agoUnder the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·27 days agoGood start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·28 days agoA truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
minus-squareBlack616Angel@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·27 days agoOkay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
Under the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
Ohhh yes
Good start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
Okay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.