• AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A sleepy town in southern Spain is in shock after it emerged that AI-generated naked images of young local girls had been circulating on social media without their knowledge.

    Police are now investigating and according to reports, at least 11 local boys have been identified as having involvement in either the creation of the images or their circulation via the WhatsApp and Telegram apps.

    She’s a gynaecologist who has used her already prominent social media profile to place this issue at the centre of Spanish public debate.

    Although many of the AI images are believed to have been created over the summer, the case only came to light in recent days after Dr Adib posted a video reassuring the girls affected and their parents.

    Spanish law does not specifically cover the generation of images of a sexual nature when it involves adults, although the creation of such material using minors could be deemed child pornography.

    Javier Izquierdo, head of children’s protection in the national police’s cyber-crime unit, told Spanish media that these kinds of crimes are no longer confined “to the guy who downloads child porn from the Dark Web or from some hidden internet forum”.


    The original article contains 835 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • GreenM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    It’s clearly immoral . I’m just not whether this is illegal anywhere just yet. Like if the head is real and rest is fake. Could it be treated like reputation damage by a judge?

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      This isn’t a new issue. People have been using image editors to create images like this years (decades?) ago. I think tackling it like you suggested, as reputation damage or something is the best way to go about this.