• Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    ·
    2 months ago

    Better headline, “Disney toes the line for Nazi scum, and Walt himself was a Nazi sympathiser even after Kristallnacht. EPCOT was his fascistic wet dream. Fuck Disney throughout time.”

    • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Never heard of EPCOT before, quickly scanned over the Wikipedia article:

      what’s the problem of that theme park?

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        2 months ago

        Before he died, the idea of EPCOT was to create his vision of an actual city, not just a park attraction. I read a quote from him about it that seems very much in the vein of Mussolini’s idea of fascism as the fusion of corporate and state power,

        “There will be no landowners and therefore no voting control. People will rent houses instead of buying them, and at modest rentals. There will be no retirees; everyone must be employed.”

        • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Aahh, see? Now that is more problematic than the article about a folkloric world theme park I read.

          But it’s also not exactly new, company towns were already a sad part of our reality. Luckily we got over it, but rich people of course always want to get back to it.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            We never got over it, they just use 401ks to control our futures now, and corporate owned housing is why rents are too high for us to do anything but work, eat, scroll, and sleep. If we stop to protest we’re in danger of homelessness.

    • Dil@is.hardlywork.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dont see how this is news there are millions of christians its not insane for one to show up in a disney movie, the trans argument is usually they are like .001% of the population but get more representation than the rest, I think its all stupid either way and the ppl making shit should be allowed to cast whatever fits their vision and not trends

  • Jack@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’ll be interesting to see a character following the teachings of Jesus Christ, like

    • Luke 16:13 “You cannot serve both God and money.”
    • Mark 10:21 “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor”
    • Matthew 5:39 “If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.”
    • Matthew 5:44 “love your enemies”

    So there’s no chance the character will be a capitalist, troop-supporting, neo-Nazi. Right?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      One of my personal favorites:

      • Luke 12:46-48:

      46 the master of that slave will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he does not know, and will cut him in pieces, and assign him a place with the unbelievers. 47 And that slave who knew his master’s will and did not get ready or act in accord with his will, will receive many lashes, 48 but the one who did not know it, and committed deeds worthy of [d]a flogging, will receive but few. From everyone who has been given much, much will be required; and to whom they entrusted much, of him they will ask all the more.

      Jesus sure loved his slaves, huh? Gives you guidelines on how to beat them. Told people to “love your enemies,” but clearly people you own don’t deserve that courtesy. He hung out with prostitutes, but was never able to disavow the practice of owning other humans as property? Kind of unacceptable imo.

      The canonical Bible (the supposed ordained word of god) also include’s Paul’s further interpretation of Jesus’ teachings on slaves in…

      • Ephesians 6:5–8:

      5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6 Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart. 7 Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not people, 8 because you know that the Lord will reward each one for whatever good they do, whether they are slave or free.

      Oof.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Jesus sure loved his slaves, huh? Gives you guidelines on how to beat them.

        That passage you quoted is not giving guidelines on how to treat slaves, it is a parable using slaves as an example. Not saying the Bible is totally anti slavery, the second passage being pretty disgusting.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          All he had to do was say, “don’t own people,” and yet…

          Not saying the Bible is totally anti slavery,

          The Bible is explicitly pro-slavery. It was literally used by slavers in the 19th century American South to justify and continue the practice of chattal slavery. They printed “slave Bibles” where all mentions of anything related to “freedom” were removed, and the focus was on teaching obedience and submission.

          What a thing for an “all-powerful” god to facilitate. Even if he were real and simply allowed his holy book to be used for such an evil purpose is enough for me to say “yeah, no thanks.”

  • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like these corps did a calculation and figured out everyone has an excuse to not boycott companies like Disney except right wingers who have become exceptionally good at the boycott.

    In my experience those people will typically boycott brands as a group meanwhile my friends find every excuse in the book to support the major corps hurting them. Even aoc went to Florida during covid. And people wonder why they win.

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This leftist has boycotted everything Sony since they bricked my PC with their rootkit in the early 2000s (and I really go out of my way to make sure nothing Sony related comes in my house, not their music, movies, games, electronics, nor their camera lenses) I only slipped up once in the past 20 or so years, when I purchased a second hand Sony Walkman mp3 player. Thing broke within 3 months of use, it’s now a constant reminder that I really need to keep boycotting Sony.

        I’ve started boycotting Amazon (including but not limited to Kindle, Audible, Prime and Twitch) and Disney since this year.

        But I’m only one person.

        I have shown myself to be capable of long term boycotts and I don’t intend to let up. I’ve added Amazon’s websites to my Pihole’s blacklist.

        But I also don’t pirate their stuff. As far as I’m concerned their TV shows and movies and such don’t exist on this planet.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          When They fucked me over on my PS3 linux install, I had a Sony TV, A Sony receiver, 2 Playstations and a ton of games.

          They’re all long gone now.

          Never again

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Leftists are already trying to fuck megacorps over, why would they try and placate them?

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          They continue to throw money at JK Rowling

          YMMV, but in my ‘woke’ crowd, nobody’s buying that merch anymore. The only people I know still doing harry potter themed crap all voted rightwing.

          The last thing I saw come through was the game. A few of the left-leaning gamers bought it but way less than baulders and starfield.

          • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Hogwarts legacy was a major success. Almost a million players the first day of launch and that’s only on steam.

            Even now, that 2 years old game has more people playing it than Avowed which just launched relatively recently LMAO 🤣. Again, that’s only on steam.

            Iw we added PSN and Nintendo, it would totally crush it

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It certainly didn’t launch to crickets. But I could have had millions more players s***** ass worldviews to herself

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What if I am offended by Christian characters, something wildly inappropriate for young impressionable minds?

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    a shift in conservative culture

    independent poll that shows 34% being against a trans character

    conservative terrorists are the greatest threat domestically

    I guess Nazis saying “I’ll fucking kill you and your kids you woke traitor” and then Americans being afraid to participate in democracy does qualify as a shift towards conservativism.

      • Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        No. Their religion was just a part of their character from the beginning. They didn’t have to “come out” as religious.

        The very notion that someone has to “come out” as Christian is an absurdity. Christians aren’t a persecuted group, although they would like you to think they were. They want so badly to be the victims, but they’re really the oppressor.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        son

        Come on 😮‍💨

        She’s very obviously a woman, don’t call her “son.”

        Why tf am I getting downvoted? What’s wrong with people?

        • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean I know a dude whose initials are KD[last initial]. He doesn’t like his feminine first name, so he started going by Katie. KD. He just can’t win.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yes, but you can clearly see a woman in her profile pic, combined with a girl’s name, on a trans instance, and if any of that gives you pause enough to check her profile, you’ll find it says, “sapphic. hater of capital letters. bunny and cat mum.” Just because some random guy somewhere goes by KD does not make it ok to misgender someone who is very obviously a woman.

            Whoever downvoted this, come out and say it my face, coward. Fuck transphobes.

            • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 months ago

              I can’t recall ever seeing a single profile pic on Lemmy. Even when clicking on a username, all I see are posts, no profile. I honestly didn’t even know there was a profile to edit. I’m primarily on Voyager.

              No downvotes from me; just adding my experience to the conversation.

            • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              2 months ago

              Anyone browsing on most mobile Lemmy apps does not see profile pics btw, so people might be downvoting because “she’s very obviously a woman” is in fact not at all obvious to mobile users.

              I did not downvote btw. Am using Eternity Lemmy client.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                There’s still the username. And the proper response to that situation is, “Oh, oops, I didn’t realize, let me edit my comment, thanks for bringing it to my attention.”

                If I can figure out a way to view who downvoted, I will be tagging them to call them out and name and shame. I find it completely inexcusable. If they didn’t know they were in the wrong, they wouldn’t be afraid to show their faces and explain themselves.

                • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I really want to down vote you because of your aggressiveness and off topic ranting but I’ll ask instead what about their username should tell me the user’s gender?

                • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I downvoted you. It’s because you don’t know how to discuss topics like an adult without arrogantly insulting people.

                  News flash: Despite what you seem to think- no one here is beneath you. You’re just a random person on the internet- just like everyone else.

                • Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I did vot you down and I’m also the guy who started all this.

                  You’re not wrong. You’re just an asshole. That’s why people vote you down.

            • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              lol… you really need to pick a better hill to die on than this- “who downvoted me?! My words need to be respected!” crap. I downvote you all the time when I see you trying to get under people’s skin- which is more frequent than when you’re not.

              You aggressively argue with people and refuse to accept that others see the word differently than you do. And both your modlog and your comment history proves this.

                • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  How?

                  Let’s see… I don’t throw temper tantrums when people downvote me. That’s one difference. I also don’t give a shit what people online think about me enough to whine that people disagreeing with me. And lastly, there’s little I find less important than what method someone uses to type shit on an Internet forum.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    Disney be like: “Friendship ended with rainbow capitalism, now christian capitalism is my best friend.”

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Given the nature of the show, and the fact it is set in modern day America, it would be stranger if it didn’t have a Christian kid in it.

    Removing any references to being transgender is pretty shitty though.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wonder how China will react. Plus for them: no trans character. Minus for them: replaced with Christian insurgent.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      If China just goes pro LGBT, it’ll be a clear sign that despite China being China, it might be time to move to China.

      That to me would be a predecessor of brain drain.

      Smart people are kinky af.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        “If only the oppressive government in a foreign country would stop oppressing my minority it would be a safe indicator to move there on a large scale, surely they would welcome outsiders raised on a western mindset into their homogenous society”