A single DMCA anti-circumvention notice, sent by Nintendo on the one-year anniversary of its 2024 lawsuit against Yuzu, showed just how much things can change in a year. Targeting nine repos linked to Switch emulator Ryujinx, the domino effect led to the removal of 4,238 repos. Elsewhere, the distilled components of Yuzu’s demise can be found in recent takedown notices

    • @tehmics
      link
      English
      11 day ago

      deleted by creator

  • mesa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    304 days ago

    I can’t wait for federated git prs/issues.

    • Sonalder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 days ago

      Do you know about Radicle ? It’s not federated but distributed and darknet based

      • mesa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 days ago

        I want to give it a shot at some point! It just looks complicated

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        254 days ago

        You can ignore a DMCA request. It’s not “do this or go to jail.” It’s a finger-wag that gives you a free out, where they can’t sue you if you do the thing. You can just… not… and then they’d have to go to the trouble of suing you. Which you can make difficult by being somewhere besides America and not giving a shit.

      • mesa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        It doesn’t. But code becomes p2p with no one organizer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I hacked my Switch right after Nintendo pulled that Yuzu BS, so it’s been jailbroken for one year now and the last time I gave any money to Nintendo was in May 2023 for Tears of the Kingdom. I recently updated it to the newest firmware in preparation for Xenoblade Chronicles X this month. No updated emulators? No problem!

      • DebatableRaccoon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        104 days ago

        Downloads ≠ good

        People are choosing to pirate them instead of pay for them and support the developer/publisher. ‘Good enough to play for free’ is also a statement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          364 days ago

          Ahh yes. The ol’ “we downloaded it because it was BAD lol” move. Classic. /s

          It amazes me that you don’t see how stupid what you just said was. It’s entirely possible to have a good game where people don’t want to support the developer/platform that it’s been released for. It’s totally fine. You can have two things at once. You can admit they make some good games. That doesn’t lessen the argument that they’re fuckin’ evil.

          • DebatableRaccoon
            link
            fedilink
            English
            54 days ago

            Ahh yes, the ol’ complete lack of nuance. A game isn’t good so it has to be bad.

            Seems the stupidity is contagious around these parts considering you go on to showcase situations of nuance. Engage brain please.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      404 days ago

      Git is significantly better than the alternatives. Don’t conflate git and GitHub, they’re entirely different.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 days ago

      Isn’t git technically already P2P? Everyone has the complete repo, and everyone can pull from everyone else, as long as a connection can be established. The networking/organization of this is just not automatic.

      • Sonalder
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        There is also Radicle that is building a darkgit with p2p distributed design

      • mesa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m not sure how I like at protocol being the thing that makes this happen, but I’m glad others are working on the issue! Maybe I’ll change my mind later but it’s still to close to a million dollar company for my taste