Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

    • corbin@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      4 days ago

      Well, letā€™s not let Baldur be a complete dumbass. There is something bad here, and weā€™ve discussed it before (1, 2), but itā€™s not ā€œUS authoritiesā€ gaining ā€œcontrolā€ over ā€œbigotry and biasesā€. The actual harm here is appointing AI-safety dorks to positions in NIST. For those outside the USA, NIST is our metrologist organization, and thereā€™s no good reason for AI safety to show up there.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        Ā·
        4 days ago

        I mean, it does amount to the US government - aka ā€œthe confederation of racist duncesā€ - declaring their intention to force the LLM owners - all US-based companies (except maybe those guys out of China, a famous free speech haven) - to make sure their model outputs align with their racist dunce ideology. They may not have a viable policy in place to effect that at this point, but it would be a mistake to pretend theyā€™re not going to implement one. The best case scenario is that it ends up being designed and implemented incompetently enough that it just crashes the AI markets. The worst case scenario is that we get a half-dozen buggy versions of Samaritan from Person of Interest but with a hate-boner for anyone with a vaguely Hispanic name. A global autocomplete that produces the kind of opinions that made your uncle not get invited to any more family events. Neither scenario is one that you would want to be plugged into and reliant on, especially if youā€™re otherwise insulated by national borders and a whole Atlantic ocean from the worst of Americaā€™s current clusterfuck.