- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
She should be grateful! The protocol is to let her and her child starve, for the crime of contributing more humans to society.
That’s what you get for not being a Libertarian sociopath!
Oh, and we need to get the birth rate up!
Childhood Memories Unlocked.
When I was in China, my mother had to find my grandmother (her mother) to babysit me when she was doing migrant work in GuangZhou (she did not have a HuKou in GuangZhou, so its basically a second-class citizen). So I’m assuming my grandmother weren’t available for some reason, so my mother took me to her work. It was some sales job that was mostly commission based, the actuall monthly income was low. And also, unlike in the west, the pay was monthly, not bi-weekly or weekly. And forget about unions, they don’t exist.
And not the mention, the fine she had to pay for violating the One Child Policy (I was the second child)
Very tangential, but isn’t the biweekly to weekly pay and american thing? My western country pays monthly too.
This is not a depiction of a village, this is what happens when the village no longer exists and everyone has to live in isolation from any social safety nets. Or to put it another way, Neoliberalism.
Yes, but think of the shareholder value.
Wow you’re right. I’ll have 2 neoliberalisms please. Gonna max out those shareholder values 💪
Would you like to add genocide to that with just a few purchases from platforms owned by literal white supremacists?
Nah, in a village you’d see kids at work with parents sometimes too. Usually you’d have some kind of daycare situation, but sometimes that’s not an option.
I can totally see a village shop where the owner is there with a baby, and the kid kinda grows up in the shop.
The difference is that they’d own the shop tho…
We aren’t talking about rasing a kid in a literal village within a Neoliberal society. “It takes a village” is an idiom about how the entire community should help to properly raise a child.
The saying emphasizes that a child’s upbringing is a communal effort involving many different people and groups, from parents to teachers to neighbors and grandparents.
The whole idea underscores the belief that the collective involvement of a community is essential in achieving a certain goal or completing a task, like raising a kid.
Essentially, it’s a friendly reminder that asking for help with hard things is okay because many hands make light work.
That seemed to be in the past, at least the distant past, the way things worked.
A smith took his son to his “office.” The kid watched. Then the kid got older, and curious. The father imparted his wisdom onto his child, and eventually, the son took over for his old man.
Hence, a family line in one business.
Or to look at another way, why people still carry the surname of Smith, Miller, Baker, etc.
The implication is she was how old when she got pregnant? Yikes. Can we talk about the $.00 Chocolate chip cookie
Combo pricing thing
Fuck you Mcdonalds, pay a living wage. There’s always money in the CEO budget.
Y’all. CEO pay ain’t the fucking problem.
McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski made $19,200,000 in compensation last year. (That includes bonuses and stock.)
Divide that out among McDonald’s 200,000 employees, ya got a whopping $96 per year raise. Or, a $.05 hourly raise.
Just imagine the fucking outrage if Kempczinski came out and said, “I’m taking $0 pay this year and giving it back to the workers that make it happen! You all get a nickel raise!” LOL, y’all would shit live kittens.
I get it. People see this fucker dragging in more money, in a single year, than they’ll make in their whole life and say, “I want a piece of that!” Again, your piece as a McDonalds employee isn’t 100 bucks a year. You’re not seeing the scale here. McDonalds brought in $30,000,000,000 in revenue last year. CEO pay is .064% of that. (Somebody check my math. Worked my ass off today. Great day! But I’m tired boss.)
I can do this all day long with publicly available numbers. Save your ire for the real problems with capitalism. Screaming about CEO pay is ignorant at best, childish at worst.
Now might be a good time to clarify that the problem with CEO pay is not the direct cost of the compensation itself. The problem is the perverse incentive structure of market manipulation and tax engineering where the CEO can increase their bonus by destroying value. This is a negative sum game - what the employees and customers lose is many times greater than what the C-Suite and shareholders gain.
Maybe not THE problem but sure as hell part of the problem. Don’t forget, salary is only 1/3 of their offer. They get more……and more. Sounds like more can be the reinvestment to employees salary. Horizontal business, not vertical.
Soooo, we shouldn’t stop at just the CEO, but all the C-suits and investors then. Got it.
Okay, I’m confused. I think your point is that CEO compensation isn’t enough to make a significant difference in pay, but you seem to be completely ignoring the fact that there is no way that dude works hundreds+ times harder than the person in the picture, and that the culture that allows that to happen is not healthy. As far as I can tell, no one is going around saying “the only thing that needs to change is how much we pay CEOs.”
He’s getting paid like his ideas are revolutionary when in reality it’s clever at best and sitting on the inertia of the corporation. Like, I get the dude has brains but that paycheck is not proportional. And this goes for every CEO out there.
And before I get the “CEOs are there to take the fall” I say when was the last time a CEO has really taken a fall? I see them get hired again elsewhere after fucking up bad. The only one I remember was that Pharma company’s false promises but because the CEO was a psycho. Otherwise they look like pedo priests being shuttled between congregations when their diddling gets found out without consequences.
Leaving aside, for the moment, that side benefits make the total much higher, that you think it’s about just the CEO proves both that you don’t understand the conversation and inherently accept the lie that they’re worth that much pay in the first place.
An extra $8/month could make a big difference in some folks’ lives, judging by the number of folks in my social circles that need a bit of help to make ends meet at the end of the month.
Just for some perspective, if you bought 2 gallons of water and 3 pounds of rice or beans a month with that $8 (rough estimate based on local prices) after a year you’d have a stockpile of 24 gallons of water and 36 pounds of food, which could possibly be a weeks worth for many families. A week of rations set aside for disaster prep could mean survival in an emergency.
Solution? Have the kid working there too. The children yearn for the fries.
While I’m certain the restaurant’s health standards are lax enough to permit it, children are peerless disease vectors. If a child is working there, you’re gambling with your health.
The children. Yearn. For the Fries.
As a former child, I agree.
This is so fucking depressing.
You don’t understand. The baby needs to pull her mom up by her bootstraps.
Lazy ass baby
The village needs to learn about birth control. Fuck around and find out.
iT tAkEs A ViLlAgE
so where is the village? wtf
I feel like the person is failing to see beyond the scope of immediate surroundings. They’re seeing the manager as the village in this case. The manager being about as good as they’re in a position to be (because let’s face it, a McDonald’s shift manager isn’t exactly the 1% and has only probably been there a few months longer and can’t tell them to just go home and they’ll get paid regardless) looks a lot like “support” if you don’t look around for the missing friends, family, community daycares, social programs or charities.
An actual community would see you being supported to be with your child when they weren’t being otherwise cared for. Like a year of parental leave from the government, guaranteed job to come back to, and daycare for when you get back.
If it never occurred to you to look for those things, the closest person in authority you can see not being as bad as they could be can look an awful lot like a favor.
Maybe if we paid people living wages they could actually afford childcare. Shit is expensive.
I actually would give the manager as much cred as possible here. They’re probably two years older than she is, what the hell can they do besides let her work and keep their head down about it? Within their scope, they really are trying to help.
Everyone else has failed this child.
Oh, 100%. I had hoped to make it clear that the manager is just another person without any actual power. The only power they have is to not send them home and have them work the register instead of the fryer. That maybe the lowest tier power possible granting the largest yet meager favor they can stands out is, as you said, everyone else failing them.
Totes, I meant that as agreement and elaboration on what you were saying.
What are these comments? This isn’t good at all.
That kid not being in daycare is costing the economy probably 1k a month in child care fees. Not to mention the worker is probably being less efficient.
Imagine if you worked really hard to open some McDonald’s branches and the workers all started to bring their kids in. Workers these days have no sense of respect.
Yes, will someone please think of the shareholders?
You’re in Orphan Crushing Machine. The sarcasm here is thick! Don’t sweat it, this is a place for dark humor while we cope with the disaster that is our world.
The sarcasm here is thick!
It’s thickest in the comment above yours 😅
wOrKeRs ThEsE dAyS
ok boomer
I suspect that is sarcasm.
Well look, if Musk can do it, it must be good, right?
This village needs to be sacked and burned to the fucking ground.
I’m pretty sure this is rage bait. What fucking McDonald’s worker wears a hi-vis vest?
One that has to bring pickup orders out to people waiting in vehicles… while also carrying a child.
Won’t invest in a vest for the kid till she can sling mcnuggets.
Gotta crawl up that corporate latter!
Where do McDonald’s bring food out to waiting cars? I’ve never seen that.
In cities and anywhere else that they ever have more than one customer waiting for food at once
Really? I’ve seen it pretty often when an order is going to take a minute and there’s cars in line behind the slow order.
They also do curbside order pickup, and are one of the only places I can think of where that makes sense (for food orders). Since their system is timed very precisely and already has a queue system, of a person says they want their order at 2, you just drop it in the prep queue the right amount of time beforehand. You also know approximately how many orders of which type you can process at once, so you can disable pickup slots when typical in person orders and booked orders get too close to the threshold.
Every other type of place just has to make the food early to avoid keeping you waiting, and it results in damp steamy food, inevitably.None of that had anything to do with what you were asking, I just went on a tangent. Some places do curbside pickup, particularly in cities.
Where is her husband?
He’s back there fixing the ice cream machine.
