Archived link

Yesterday, the West Virginia House of Delegates approved an amendment from Del. J.B. Akers ® to allow a child’s “treating health care provider” to examine a child’s genitals without the consent of their parents.

The amendment was actually an improvement over a previous version of the bill, which, state Democrats argued, would have allowed teachers to perform the genital examinations.

Akers’ amendment was the Republican response to one proposed by Del. Kayla Young (D), which would have banned child and adult genital examinations altogether.

“It’s unconscionable that Republicans would support legislation that authorizes intrusive visual inspections of minors without parental approval,” Young said. “West Virginians should be alarmed and disgusted by this invasion of privacy.”

It also says that all intersex people are “either male or female” but does not give a basis for assigning a sex to them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 hours ago

    They need to change theb song lyrics. “Almost heaven” doesn’t describe West Virginia as well as “Bathroom creepers.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1712 hours ago

    And here comes the decades of child abuse from abusers who found the glaring loop hole.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1613 hours ago

    So wait… Couldn’t they just simply request a copy of a child’s yearly physical from their physician? For example, in the 90s/2000s, if we wanted to join a sport we had to get a physical from our GP of choice so the doctor can confirm it was safe for us to play the sport in question. It was a form the doctor and parent filled out, then gave to the school. I would think something like that was already a thing?? I also remember my parents having to submit certain medical records to my schools for other reasons… Why would anyone else need to examine these children???

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      711 hours ago

      Ideally, if the politicians actually believed what they told their votes, then yes, they would do it that way. But… Trump was best friends with Jeffry Epstein. Nearly all the Maga billionaires visited Epstein’s island. The Republican party is full of pedos, sex traffickers and Nazis.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2424 hours ago

    We found the real freaks. I wonder if the Pizzagate/Qanon dipshits have figured it out yet: everything the qons do is about projection.

    • Gloomy
      link
      fedilink
      613 hours ago

      What actually happend to the Qanon movement? Is that still a thing? Is it dead?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 hours ago

        Likely just mainstream Republicans now, along with the teabaggers (often the same people).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      213 hours ago

      If anything to go by their Hungarian counterparts, their only problem is “homosexual pedophilia”, while celebrate old guys who manage to hook up with actual teens as “real studs”, then blame the victims for the pedophilia, because “14 year olds back then played with dolls, not dressed like sluts”. And I was the one who felt bad for posting Railgun memes with “You know what are the number one causes of pedophilia? Sexy children” text onto my anime shitposting page…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    361 day ago

    So republican parents are ok with strangers inspecting their child’s genitals without their consent?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 day ago

    This is stupid as fuck, right, but who doesn’t accompany their child into the doctor’s office?

    Like there are no circumstances under which I’m leaving my child alone with an adult who may examine their genitals and having had child safety training myself just being alone with a child that isn’t yours is a terrible idea altogether.

    • Caedarai
      link
      fedilink
      1017 hours ago

      I think part if the motivation here would be to allow the doctor present at a school to determine whether a child is participating in the correct sex-appropriate placement. Like using the correct locker rooms or bathrooms in case teachers or other students bring up an issue (for example if a boy were to go into a girl’s locker room and claim to really be a girl). Since appearance doesn’t line up with sex in many cases nowadays, the inspection would be to determine the real sex of the individual. Some school activities will involve nudity (changing before entering a swimming pool, communal showering after a sports match or gym class, etc.) so the authors of this were initially pushing for any teacher (such as the supervisor in a locker room or the teacher of the associated class) to be able to inspect/determine the sex of the individual.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1124 hours ago

      So… under no circumstances are they going to bring doctors into schools to perform these inspections?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        ‘Doctors’ like someone who passed med school, flunked out of residency and couldn’t land a practicing job anywhere they were so god awful.

        But they are a doctor!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        924 hours ago

        I suppose that hadn’t occurred to me because I live in a country where, if that were to happen, I couldn’t imagine the level of social unrest it would cause.

        It’s just beyond reason.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What level are they allowed to view? If the child says no are they able to force their way into their pants? At what point does it become rape?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        218 hours ago

        Unless…we can come up with some sort of legislation…totally important and necessary legislation, of course!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        231 day ago

        You’re looking at this problem all wrong, it’s not that children cannot consent. Nobody is arguing that. The change here is that now those that would be doing the tests are no longer considered child predators because they didn’t do anything illegal. So now it would be totally fine for priests, doctors, senators, neighbors, etc to look at random kids genitals to verify sexuality without any resistance from their parents/guardians. Is this how we finally do away with rapists, by redefining sexual assault.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 day ago

          So now it would be totally fine for priests, doctors, senators, neighbors, etc

          “treating health care provider”

          Some of these things are not like the others.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            19 hours ago

            After COVID, many doctors left rural areas. This has left many communities across the country lacking proper “treating health care providers”. Who do you think is going to fill that gap for the purpose of this bill. Besides, most of the time the ones that are making headlines for this stuff typically have an R next to their name. But you’re right, some of these things are not like the others. And that’s kinda my point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    201 day ago

    Only a fucking piece of trash thinks it’s ok for a teacher to look at a kid’s junk, regardless of if the parents give consent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      191 day ago

      Former teacher here. Any teacher that would comply with such an order to inspect is also a fucking piece of trash.

      Once our assistant principal went on a witch hunt about enforcing uniform compliance. He wanted us all to inspect socks to ensure they were the right color. Turns out the color of my kids’ socks doesn’t impact the learning environment, so no, we aren’t wasting class time on this.

      So no, I’m not inspecting genitals. And if there is a move to do such a thing at school, I’d spend the entire class time calling parents letting them know what’s going on.

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    851 day ago

    Oh the irony that the shitheads that couldn’t wear a mask, and want to ban books because of “parent rights”, now want to ice parents out of the decision of a rando looking at their kids genitals.

    • @iknowitwheniseeit
      link
      312 hours ago

      It turns out that conservative people believe in specific people, not in ideology. So any claims about reasons for specific policies are basically just pretext.