Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • Magnus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    929 minutes ago

    I remember Elon foolishly saying his cars don’t need radar or lidar. Even software-disabling radar in cars that already had the hardware.

  • @jewbies
    link
    English
    631 minutes ago

    That’s some Wiley Coyote shit if I ever saw it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 hour ago

    Apparently they keep getting tickets in China because they didn’t bother to adjust the settings to accommodate Chinese roads and traffic laws. Result is Tesla is getting utterly crushed by BYD in their one major market that doesn’t care about Elon’s antics.

  • FauxPseudo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    225 minutes ago

    New stuff to add to the car kit bag for the 21st century

    1. poster board to block usonic weapons
    2. black paint, white paint, roller, brush to paint tunnels on walls
    3. orange cones to pen in self driving cars
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    522 hours ago

    This is why it’s fucking stupid Tesla removed Lidar sensors and relies on cameras only.

    But also who would want a tesla, fuck em

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 hour ago

      They never had lidarr. They used to have radar and uss but they decided “vision” was good enough. This conveniently occurred when they had supply chain issues during covid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 hours ago

      I was horrified when I learned that the autopilot relies entirely on cameras. Nope, nope, nope.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 hours ago

      They also removed radar, which is what allowed them to make all of those “it saw something three vehicles ahead and braked to avoid a pileup that hadn’t even started yet” videos. Removing radar was the single most impactful change Tesla made in regards to FSD, and it’s all because Musk basically decided “people drive fine with just their eyes, so cars should too.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 minutes ago

    Is this video being suppressed by the YouTube algorithm? I wonder if it’s because of Tesla or Disney. Or maybe it’s because of simulated child harm?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    244 hours ago

    There’s a very simple solution to autonomous driving vehicles plowing into walls, cars, or people:

    Congress will pass a law that makes NOBODY liable – as long as a human wasn’t involved in the decision making process during the incident.

    This will be backed by car makers, software providers, and insurance companies, who will lobby hard for it. After all, no SINGLE person or company made the decision to swerve into oncoming traffic. Surely they can’t be held liable. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    Once that happens, Level 4 driving will come standard and likely be the default mode on most cars. Best of luck everyone else!

    • NicoleFromToronto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 hours ago

      These same laws will be grandfathered in for ai. This way your health insurance companies computer can murder you by denying care and nobody can be held civilly or criminally liable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 hours ago

      You can’t sue me for my driverless car that drops caltrops, forcing everyone else to take the train.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 hours ago

      Actually elon demanded that lidar be depricated because of phantom breaking years ago, they only use visible spectrum cameras now

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 hours ago

      They are so expensive too! /s

      Who would have known electronics gets cheaper all the time?? /j

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Tesla had camera+radar+sonar, and that wasn’t their own tech - they used mobileye EyeQ back then. When they switched to in house tech they gradually ditched the radar and sonar which made no sense to me. But at the time I saw their lead say in an interview that this is superior and I believed. not anymore.

        they said doing so cut costs but obviously lidar/radar/sonar only gets cheaper over time, let alone the extra r&d costs because a vision only system is much more difficult to develop.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        104 hours ago

        It was removed because it was giving false positives. They should have upgraded it with lidar but decided to just remove it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 hours ago

            Bahaha, what kind of a bizarre statement is that?

            Was he trying to imply the government only uses spreadsheets and nosql DBs?

            Or did he think it was necessary to point out that your average government employee isn’t writing their own SQL to grab data they need?

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 hours ago

              Someone said something he didn’t like so he blurted out the first ignorant thing that he thought of, as usual.