• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 年前

    I don’t remember if Windows updates would cause it but installing Windows second definitely would. Likewise, I think upgrading (from say Windows 7 to 10) might. Basically Windows is just like “this MBR? It’s actually mine, thanks.” With no option to not erase it.

    • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 年前

      EFI systems don’t use the MBR. Windows will default to using the whole disk if you don’t use the “advanced” button, but so will most linux distro installers.

        • Ooops@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          2009 usually means you could indeed run it without an MBR: GPT format plus a very small (2MB) partition flagged to take over the functionality of containing a bootloader normally embedded in the MBR.

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Correct. But Windows is not changing the BIOS boot order. It will however change your EFI to make itself the default boot again, even if you configured it to use a separate ESP on a completely separate disk and the boot menu residing there. That’s by design as you can access your efi settings from a running system via software, while your chances to change your BIOS settings from outside the BIOS are slim to non-existent.

        Also every BIOS not decades old can indead run with a hybrid setup of GPT formated disk with a small partiton to replace the MBR functionality.