• 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      The main reason is that it is completely controlled by Canonical, with no way to add alternative repos.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You can, but that completely negates the reasons why you’d want to have a repo system in the first place. You gotta do the legwork to get updates, for example.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            And to be explicit about it, zypper, dnf, apt, flatpak all have a specific mechanism to declare repositories and one ‘update’ check will walk them all.

            snap does not, and manually doing a one off is useless. AppImage also has no ‘update’ concept, but it’s a more limited use case in general, it’s a worse habit than any repository based approach.

          • JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            This isn’t necessarily true - a developer choosing to not include their app in a repo can always opt for a self-updating mechanism.

            Don’t get me wrong - repos and tooling to manage all of your apps at once are preferred. But if a developer or user wants to avoid the Canonical controlled repo, I’m just pointing out there are technically ways to do that.

            If you’d question why someone would use snap at all at that point… that would be a good question. The point is just that they can, if they want to.

      • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, it does not just work. It removes the option to install updates manually through GUI. If Firefox was running, the only GUI solution is to close it and wait 6 hours or whatever.

        My wife was perfectly fine installing updates from the tray with Synaptic. The PC is always connected to the TV with Jellyfin left open in Firefox where she was watching.

        So I switched to Manjaro to have a pretty OS that isn’t getting rid of their package manager controlling the most used program.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I hate it for the refresh nag messages alone.

      The default Firefox in Ubuntu is a snap and I only knew that because due to nagging and having to restart constantly while I was using it and had to learn about snaps and how to install Firefox without them on Ubuntu.

    • Ooops@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If something exists in native form, use that. If it doesn’t or you want some sandboxing (and there is at least some argument for a containerized version that brings all its needed dependencies, for developers not having to test for every linux for example) there’s flatpack or appimage. Snap is just Canonical’s proprietary alternative to flatpack. And also worse in basically any aspect. So they shove it down their users throat instead. Even for stuff that would be available natively and should just be installed via the normal package manager. And to make really sure, nobody is avoiding their crap, they also redirect commands, so for example using apt to install your browser automatically redirects your command to snap install…