This website contains age-restricted materials including nudity and explicit depictions of sexual activity.
By entering, you affirm that you are at least 18 years of age or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from and you consent to viewing sexually explicit content.
It already does.
Its more a question of economics of scale. Taping out a single custom chip is extremely expensive, like hundreds of millions of dollars before a single chip is sold.
AMD could make a custom Strix Halo SKU for Valve (think a 6-core X3D CCD, a 32-40CU GPU clocked low for efficiency) for much less. Perhaps something like that (a custom multi-die configuration of Strix Halo’s successor?) is what Valve opted for.
Well yeah. But I used the word “substantial” together with the word “price”.
If the return ain’t worth it, it’s not “substantial” yet, and hence “It already does.” is a false statement.
Yeah. But what I’m getting at is the economics may hint at what valve is planning.
Maybe AMD isn’t making a “specialized” monolithic die like Van Gogh? Perhaps Valve is simply customizing blocks of AMD’s existing product (die) stack, which is more financially plausible.
AFAIK one of the current issues with Strix Halo for a handheld would be high idle power, but maybe the next generation is better in that respect.
I think they’ll do whatever makes sense.
I’m just saying Valve and AMD are on the same page about making it happen when and if it makes sense.
For now, the first steamdeck is still great.