• JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Repeated content. When I doomscroll I see the same posts I’ve already seen instead of less popular ones.

    • hazeebabee@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Some of the lemmy front ends have an option to hide posts you’ve already seen. I know connect does.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I instantly disliked that when I joined Lemmy. This could totally be solved in the frontend by storing hashes of pictures I’ve seen before.

      • Rose56@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Block the person or the community.
        I had this problem with US politics, same most multiple times, blocking communities did work for me.

        • JTskulk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I do want to see the content and community, just once though. I don’t even mean the same story being posted multiple times, but I think I see the exact same post multiple times.

  • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    not enough of my niche interests from reddit moved here. also the sports communities are a little bit like ghost towns

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s pretty much a symptom of having a small userbase. The most niche thing that can maintain activity isn’t very niche yet. I hope and expect it will improve over time, and in the meanwhile I’d like to see the attitude to Reddit repost bots to soften.

    • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah same, the only solution is for you yourself to post in those niche communities more often, making them more active and thus more attractive for other users.

      • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pleasantly surprised to see a football community that is actually about the game where you kick a ball with your foot.

  • Ludrol@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lemmy devs - they are a curse and a blessing. A blessing that they worked on lemmy before reddit exodus. A curse as it’s hard to contribute to the codebase and related components.

    At least we have mbin and piefed to federate with.

    Also in the 2 years since, the culture has shifted. There is less: “This is a new place. let’s make it enjoyable for everyone” and more “I am right, everyone is wrong, and I will ruin your day”, but that could be just my perception and not enough blocking.

    • BubblyRomeo@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      “I am right, everyone is wrong, and I will ruin your day”

      u/Ludrol

      This WILL be the fate of EVERY alternative social media platform. Part of Fediverse or not. As all alternate social media platforms birth from some sort of protest/activism/boycott, the best example is how Shittit (Reddit) API changes gave birth to Shitmmy (Lemmy) and Deadbin (Mbin). Alternate platforms usually give space to de-platformed individuals. In the past Alt social medias gave space for the far right and alt-right, now it’s far left and alt-left. Nothing different. Just look at what shitshow is going on in Shitsky (Bluesky) and Shitlight social (Skylight social)! Every post is “Orange man bad!”, “MAGA Bad!”. I gave Shitlight social a try and couldn’t stand it! The folks there are chronically online and so deluded that they think everyone is MAGA, like there was a video where a young 11 year girl drove her parents car to the supermarket to buy something and crashed the car into the supermarket, the comments were like “The parents are Trump supporters!”. I was like WTF! There was no media coverage of this incident (at the point when the video was made), the video was filmed by someone inside the supermarket, no other context, no nothing! And those deluded foids were screaming “Her parents are Trump supporters!” without even knowing the girl’s name! To them everyone is a Trump supporter. Every alt media platform will become like this- filled with individuals on the extreme sides of the political spectrum. No alt media platform will reach mainstream status including the ones on Shitiverse (Fediverse).

    • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s just as bad of an echo chamber as other sites. I have to actively “stop” browsing lemmy after a bit because I get annoyed at the repetitive nature of everything.

      I’ve very much tried in the last few years to limit social media. I think it’s been a benefit for me. I like social media, but having “stops” makes it more enjoyable and prevents the doom feelings.

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Some Communities are still controlled by people with absurd egos and overconfidence. Most of them hate people too, which is fun for a community manager.

    I think it mirrors real life though, the type of people who want to be leaders tend to be assholes, and the ones who would be good at leading won’t volunteer to do it.

  • ter_maxima@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not enough people for even slightly niche communities. Wanna talk about smash brothers ? 732 people, only 2 posts in the last month.

    This is why people still use reddit on the side.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I don’t think that in itself if the problem. anyone can host an instance. The problem is lemmy.ml being the apparent default instance, advertising itself as an instance for privacy and FOSS enthusiasts, and not mentioning seemingly anywhere in the description/rules that only red flavour authoritarian dogma is allowed in political discussion.

      “America bad, therefore former ‘communist’ russia and current ‘communist’ china good.”

      Edit: it’s not featured as prominently as it used to be on join-lemmy.org so things may be improving. they should still mention in the description that western viewpoints on many issues are not allowed due to “rule 1”

      • nebulaone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I realized .ml was fucking insane and delusional when they glorified Stalin and refused to recognize the atrocities he committed.

        No matter what your political stance is, as soon as you deny negative facts and exclusively push the “positives” it becomes a problem and may radicalize you (if that isn’t already the case).

        What happened to nuanced moderate politics? It seems people unconditionally put the “left” or “right” label on themselves. And ironically these blind followers will have the audacity to call anyone close to the political center, or people who are honest with themselves, cowards.

          • nebulaone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            4 days ago

            I was on .ml first after leaving reddit, because I didn’t know this was the case, until I called out straight up state propaganda and defended capitalism with social and ethical policies once. You can imagine how they responded to that.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 days ago

        yea I visited the instance index some time ago because I had to pick a replacement for lemm.ee (rip in peace), saw the description under lemmy.ml and wondered whether they were being intentionally or accidentally misleading.

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          They certainly mislead me. My first year or so was on lemmy.ml @[email protected]

          After repeated bans i decided to move to a more relaxed instance. i still interact with lemmy.ml because some of the bigger open source communities are there, but .ml admins now cannot block me from accessing the full lemmyverse, only their diminishing corner of it

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          im glad i blocked that instance, i was accidentally engaging into too many .ml posts there were mirror image of how conservatives posts, just whining and chastising opinions.

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          well tbf they are the two most active servers there though. not sure why .world isnt on there though. maybe removed temporarily so that newbies filter out to smaller instances

          • wjs018@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            IIRC it is intentional that world isn’t there to help spread out users to other instances.

    • redsunrise@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Tankies on their way to hate private ownership and dictatorship of the bourgeoisie so much that they begin to love state ownership and dictatorship of the bureacracy

  • intelisense@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 days ago

    Duplicate communities posting the same content over and over again.

    Communities are tied to an instance. How many communities will die because lemm.ee is shutting down? There is a slightly mad rush to migrate communities already.

    Lemmy should have used usent style naming for communities.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The lemmy.ml instance not being treated the same as the rest of the Triad in regards to defederation

    Some highlights from the link:

    "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/30580167

    “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” ~ Davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/30673342

    .ml admin, Nutomics continued transphobia https://lemmy.world/post/29222558

    CW: Original transphobic Comment from Nutomic

    “NK is actually good and anything counter to that is Western propaganda!” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/31595035

    General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet ~davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

    “If you don’t support Russia then you just don’t understand geopolitics” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

    And a long list of bans/censorship and allowing the proliferation of known propaganda and misinformation outlets clearly demonstrating use of their instance and recognition to force a political narrative

    • Mearuu@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 days ago

      I am currently working on a report on vote manipulation and the early results are showing clear signs of the some most prolific .ml accounts participating in brigading and vote manipulation.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        I can’t count the number of times I made a comment way deep in a chain that conflicts with .ml dogma, and after the first downvote, there are suddenly 5 more within minutes

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        that was so pervasive on reddit, you either get banned, or ended up arguing more and then get banned.

        • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think the parent comment is talking about piefed the software, compared to Lemmy the software, not the specific piefed.social instance they’re posting from.

            • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              The developers of the Lemmy software are the admins of the lemmy.ml instance and are problematic. The complaint is that the software itself can’t be separated from the priorities of the .ml instance.

              Piefed doesn’t have the same issue, even if the flagship instance federates with .ml

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      i block the whole instance, so i dont have to deal with any of those posts, but the single .ml accounts can still be problematic.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 days ago

    Niche communities. Large spaces are built of small niche interest groups. The tooling around small spaces needs to be first class if we want the larger space to be healthy

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      same, certain things location based subs are not found on lemmy, and youtuber channel based discussions also not found here. plus things like like health, medical,etc. movies/entertainment has enough to satisfy people, but not to the extent as on reddit.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s just as much a left-wing echo chamber as Truth Social is a right-wing one - and that’s a problem in both cases. Some might say it’s fine because we’re on the right side of history and they’re not, or something along those lines - but the people on Truth Social think the exact same thing. No one’s views ever change that way.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The right wing instances are just defederated from this larger federated group because the people on them were unable to follow the rules of other instances. Repeatedly, they would throw tantrums and create loads of dupe accounts to spam shit when people downvoted their shitty views or their accounts got banned. If they were capable of behaving with civility and following the rules, they’d still be here.

      No idea how active that corner of the Lemmyverse is these days, but they have repeatedly chosen to behave in a way that leaves instance administrators with little choice other than defederation.

      • Proudly Green@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The right wing instances are just defederated from this larger federated group because the people on them were unable to follow the rules of other instances.

        I don’t think it’s just that. I have seen plenty of people say that no conservative content should be allowed on Lemmy. At all.

        Go post a conservative article in c/politics and see what happens. Some of the DM’s you’ll get are actually reportable to the FBI. The anti-conservative streak here is extreme. I’ve reported some of the DM’s I get to the police, and I’m not even conservative, but just because I advocate 3-party voting. People on here can be insane.

        I’ve seen plenty of pitchforks go after posters. Even when it’s a neutral article that talks about something positive a conservative politician did or said.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t think there is such a thing as a left wing echo chamber. We bicker incessantly. The other day I was making a joke at the expense of the car-brain mentality and someone came at me for ableism.

      I’m not mad at them, it’s just illustrative of my point. We don’t take shit from each other, and we take each other to task over jokes. The right will, meanwhile, forgive literal pedophilia, rape, and murder of each other. I’m sure as hell not saying we should, but we will never create an echo chamber as good as they do because of that.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is also a dearth of cannibalistic viewpoints here. And Zoroastrians are woefully underrepresented.

      I don’t come here to change my views (though it happens from time to time), and neither do they. I’m not ignorant of their thoughts; I’m inundated with them every day. I don’t need to interact with assholes here. I don’t want to come here and watch people scream back and forth at each other, and I definitely am not interested in participating—there is a reason I’ve left other social media.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Saw a documentary on them ages ago and they’ve always stuck with me for some reason.

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        You don’t have to subscribe to political communities if you don’t want to see political discussion. But the dearth of genuine political discussion here is a problem for the people who do want it, that can’t be fixed by individual action.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          What is genuine political discussion? How do you moderate it? Who is going to come when it’s moderated? How do you deal with both legitimate and legitimate complaints about biased moderation?

          I just don’t think it’s a thing on social media. I think it can happen in private conversations, but as soon as it becomes more about winning an argument or posturing for readers, I think any hope of earnest discourse is lost. The more public a conversation, the worse it is. It’s like trying to argue with a bully in front of their friends. You might be able to reach the humanity in them, but not in that moment.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            It used to be, in the early days of mass social media (and it was widespread on forums)

            Moderation isn’t easy but it also needn’t be fraught - set standards of civility (strict or loose) and basic rules about hate speech, and let people take themselves out of discussions that are within the rules that they nevertheless don’t like.

            It works a lot better in small communities where you talk to the same people - you can ignore people you don’t like and not have the same conversation over and over.

        • Proudly Green@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You don’t have to subscribe to political communities if you don’t want to see political discussion.

          True but it seems like the majority of Lemmys like attaching anything and everything to something political. I saw some post about a squirrel or something, just chiling in the heat. Supposed to be cute. Immediately devolved into how fat the squirrel looked and how it must be a MAGA squirrel. Then the conversation just devolved into “cheeto man”(stupidist overused Lemmy term ever!) jokes over and over.

          Also, Lemmy: why the fuck do you all think saying “cheeto man” is so hilarious? It’s something that 2nd graders would snicker at. Once. And you all say it over and over. WTF?! No wonder you all can’t get girlfriends.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah this is something that has got way worse over time. It used to be that most forums would default to “no politics” and then there were discussion areas set aside for that. And now if you criticise someone for bringing politics into something where it doesn’t belong, you will get angry responses declaring that you’re burying your head in the sand. No, I just don’t want lowest-hanging-fruit political comments on every cat picture.

        • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          But the dearth of genuine political discussion here is a problem for the people who do want it

          It’s not genuine if we don’t want to constantly have to expose ourselves to toxic bigots or “smooth” manipulators who think it’s not really toxic bigotry if they are “just asking questions?”

          It’s not genuine if we don’t want to start every single discussion of something bad Trump did with rebutting a half dozen versions of “but whatabout that time when dems…”?

          I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:

          I will not be shamed into allowing toxicity into my life, on social media or otherwise, in the name of “avoiding an echo chamber.” NOTHING is stopping a conservative from coming here and making cogent, factual arguments, aside from their own fragility.

          The conservatives who “can’t” post to Lemmy are the ones who don’t know how to have an actual conversation and get banned. What fraction of conservatives that represents is an excercise left to the reader. But I’ve got my own opinion on that number for sure.

          • Proudly Green@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            NOTHING is stopping a conservative from coming here and making cogent, factual arguments, aside from their own fragility.

            Except for all the Lemmys saying that no conservatives should be allowed on Lemmy. I have seen conservatives try to ask a question. Then so many immediately jump to calling the poster a sealioning nazi, that they just get run off. Lemmy is one of the more hateful places I have seen.

            I’m not conservative by the way, so you all don’t have send me nazi dm’s.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            The fact that you characterise natural ways of engaging in a discussion negatively doesn’t mean it’s not genuine, and it doesn’t mean you’re forced to look at it if it’s available.

            NOTHING is stopping a conservative from coming here and making cogent, factual arguments, aside from their own fragility.

            The structure of vote-based social media makes it difficult, and the people who, rather than remove themselves from places where arguments happen, shout down the people having the arguments, stops this from happening.

            You’d be right to point out that conservative-majority spaces are just as, if not more guilty of this, but that doesn’t make it less true.

            The conservatives who “can’t” post to Lemmy are the ones who don’t know how to have an actual conversation and get banned.

            That’s true but it’s not the only thing that’s going on.

            • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              The fact that you characterise natural ways of engaging in a discussion negatively doesn’t mean it’s not genuine,

              It’s natural to ask questions. It’s natural to point out hypocrisy.

              JAQing off and Whataboutism are not those things.

              Edit: And frankly, having to explain that in regard to my comment above is precisely what I love not having to constantly do at Lemmy. (Because people both understand the difference, and don’t pretend not to.)

              it doesn’t mean you’re forced to look at it if it’s available.

              The case being made here is that this is a left wing echo chamber, and that I am not interested in genuine discussion if I either don’t think it is, or don’t care that it is.

              I have provided examples of trolling, toxic behavior.

              I do not want trolling, toxic behavior here. It is not welcome by me in the community, whether I’m forced to look at it or not.

              I’m also not supporting (and nor am I aware of any such thing existing) some kind of a blanket ban on conservatives. They are the folks always telling people to man up, grab themselves by their bootstraps, have the courage of their convictions, etc etc. Guess they need to take some of their own advice if it’s a little rough sometimes trying to push authoritarianism and bigotry in some spaces. And if they get banned because they have forgotten how to talk to people who don’t already agree with them, I can’t find it in me to care.

              I will not be shamed into allowing toxicity into my life, on social media or otherwise, in the name of “avoiding an echo chamber.”

              • FishFace@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                JAQing off and Whataboutism are not those things.

                Yeah, but if you go in saying that this is the inevitable result of having conservatives discuss politics here, I am suspicious that your threshold for those terms is waaayy lower than mine.

                The person I replied to originally wasn’t talking about trolling or toxic behaviour, they were talking about conservative viewpoints (likening them to cannibalism, I might add) so, if you want to chip in that trolling isn’t welcome then I’ll certainly agree with that, but there’s a reason I’m not really talking about that.

                • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  These are two of the the primary things gone from my life now that I’ve cut every conservative I can from it. It’s glorious.

                  So if you want me to support some kind of outreach for conservatives (who apparently can’t post anywhere they aren’t overtly welcomed and that’s a problem the rest of us need to fix) I need some understanding of what you think the upside is.

                  I haven’t seen that.

                  I’ve seen scolding people for not wanting to surround themselves with people who have had years and years to demonstrate what they are like and what they support. The only thing new about modern conservatism is how it no longer bothers trying to pretend it’s not hateful.

                  As I have said repeatedly, nothing stops a conservative from coming here and communicating like an adult.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think the main problem is that there isn’t much besides politics and memes. Most communities that aren’t politics seem to devolve into meme communities.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        I feel like that’s an issue that’s exacerbated by the predominance of image posts over text posts, and text post only communities.

        • FishFace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s probably an issue with vote-based discussions full stop. Post something funny and it’ll get votes because of the laughs; post something everyone in your echo-chamber agrees with and it’ll get votes because it’s right-on.

          Maybe I just want to go back to forums.

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            Forums still exist, but I hard agree with you. I was so excited when the lemmy devs were considering hiding votes counts from the frontend by default. Unfortunately (imo) it got shot down by the community pretty quickly.

            I think “likes” as a socials concept are part of a dark engagement pattern we’ve willfully brought over from the mainstream, and we won’t be able to be much better than them until we’re rid of it.

            • FishFace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah, I am on… two forums. I think the issue is that it’s not where the people are any more.

              I actually think the problem with voting is that the way it’s used to promote threads instead of doing it on a time basis. It’s part of a way of engaging with a site which punishes long-running conversations.

              • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                What do you mean on a time basis?

                Agree that it’s hard to find really long running conversions (like what you see on forums), unless you happen to be going back and forth with one other person (notifications pull you back in).

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 days ago

        “The right” consists of individuals, just like “the left” does - and there’s plenty of bad faith to be found on both sides.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          Is this like plenty of fine people on both sides? In aggregate, one side is far more egregious and it’s not even close.

          • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            Speaking of bad faith…

            Yes, and just like Trump, I’m not speaking of the white nationalists and nazies.

            "So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists – because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.

            “Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets, and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group.”

            Source

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              4 days ago

              Uh huh, and I’m sure we can take him at his word. It’s not like he’s ever lied. He never gave a nod to nazis ever, like telling the proud boys to stand by. Yup, good old not racist donnie, I’m sure he totally hates white supremacists.

              You wanna talk bad faith, believe anything that comes out of his orange piehole.

              • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                Misrepresenting what someone says is a textbook example of bad faith so doing that in a discussion about bad faith is ironic to say the least. What he actually thinks is unrelated to this discussion as it’s about what he said. You’d call people out for twisting your words so hold yourself to the same standards.

                • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Not believing lying sociopaths is not bad faith, and I’m having trouble accepting that you’d actually think it is. I’m not sure why you’re so hung up on mango mussolini anyway, as this discussion started when I claimed that the right lied way more than the left. The president wasn’t responsible for all the lies the GOP has told for the past 50 years, although he sure does have more than his fair share.

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  You are appearing more and more bad faith, or just plain grossly ignorant, and willfully so… If you won’t accept the truth, the truth that is being handed to you, with references, by other people, then prepare to not be part of this “echo chamber” for much longer…

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              4 days ago

              Note that this is the second statement he made, which he had to make after being called out by the media for seemingly supporting the neonazi protestors. Which, given his history at that point and subsequently, it’s pretty obvious that the media was right and he was just back tracking due to bad publicity.

                • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Yeah, and it specifically ignores that the statement you posted was the second, clarifying statement days later. Snopes is going off what he said he meant, not actually what he said. Check the United the Right wiki page for the actual timeline.

                  Stop letting other people think for you.

                  Trump did not respond to the torchlight parade on Friday night or the demonstrations on Saturday morning until 1:19 pm on Saturday, August 12, when he tweeted, “We ALL must be united & condemn all that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in America. Lets come together as one!”[284][33]

                  At the bill-signing ceremony, Trump said that “we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides”.[284][33][288][289] He added that it had been “going on for a long time in our country. Not Donald Trump, not Barack Obama. A long, long time” and that “a swift restoration of law and order” was now vital.[289]

                  A statement attributed to an unnamed White House spokesperson was released the next day, asserting that "The President said very strongly in his statement yesterday that he condemns all forms of violence, bigotry, and hatred. Of course that includes white supremacists, KKK, Neo-Nazi and all extremist groups. He called for national unity and bringing all Americans together

                  After the backlash for his remarks, Trump read a statement from a teleprompter two days later at the White House.[310][292] He said that “anyone who acted criminally in this weekend’s racist violence, you will be held fully accountable.”[287] and that “[r]acism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the K.K.K., neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”[311]

                  The closest they have is the unattributed statement, again after the fact, trying to clarify what he said wasn’t what he meant. Like they always do.

            • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 days ago

              Thank god you can point to ONE SINGLE instance where Trump isn’t actively supporting white nationalist christofascism.

        • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          “The right” consists of individuals,

          Every last one of them who voted for trump has decided that bigotry (of multiple sorts) and steamrolling our constitution in the name of authoritarianism are somewhere between just what they wanted and not a dealbreaker.

          What else do I need to know about them?

          https://www.project2025.observer/

          • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            What else do I need to know about them?

            That people identify on the political right outside of US as well?

            • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              Heh, I’m sure they are much better people than US conservatives, but I’ll quote myself from elsehwere.

              The conservatives who “can’t” post to Lemmy are the ones who don’t know how to have an actual conversation and get banned. What fraction of conservatives that represents is an excercise left to the reader. But I’ve got my own opinion on that number for sure.

              • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                Maybe you should re-read my original comment? Because unless you think that Lemmy is not a left wing echo chamber then I have no clue what you’re arguing about here exactly.

                • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  OK, have crawled up the context tree, and don’t see where you think I’ve misunderstood your point. You think it’s an echo chamber (I do not) and you think that’s bad (I do not) and apparently I’m supposed to feel a little sheepish about not wanting shitty people with shitty behavior here at Lemmy. (I do not.)

                • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Maybe I misread you. I think I’m being told not only that it is an echo chamber, but that I’m supposed to be bothered by it.

                  Meanwhile I haven’t seen an argument for what we’d gain by having more conservatives here, or what’s stopping those unicorn conservatives who aren’t raging assholes from posting.

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Some might say it’s fine because we’re on the right side of history and they’re not, or something along those lines

      I say it’s fine because if there’s one thing I’ve learned repeatedly since about 2017, it’s that the single most effective thing I can do to reduce toxicity in my life is to reduce my interactions with conservative family members, coworkers, ‘friends’, and social media accounts.

      It’s remarkably effective. I interact with no conservative or known trump voter more than work or family obligations require. Haven’t for years. Best mental health step I’ve taken in my adult life.

      Not my fault they have all forgotten that “loudest asshole in the room” isn’t a personality.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d much, much rather be in an echo chamber where BS is questioned and reality is not ignored than a conservative hellscape where basic facts of reality are ignored, like, “tons of CO2 in the atmosphere is totally fine, actually” or, “trans people are corrupting sports!”.

      Yea… fuck those at best extremely stupid people and at worst, vitriolic piles of trash.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      Agreed on all counts.

      The real mystery to me is what value the echo-chamber residents get out of it. Why would someone join a group of people they already agree with, just to be told that their opinions are correct, and to shout down any interloper who contradict them? How is that not a boring waste of time? Is it that most people are insecure in their views and need validation, perhaps? It’s a phenomenon I still don’t understand.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        People often accuse me of being a troll because I tend to voice views that are unpopular on this platform. Personally, I just don’t see any point in talking about things we all already agree on. I’d much rather try to change the views of those I disagree with - or have them try to change mine.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        I find I don’t agree with a lot of people, though there is at least a higher chance that someone, especially from my instance, will share my values and at least be willing to hear dissenting opinions without going right to insincere strawmaning.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          To be clear, you join the echo chamber because you won’t be judged there and also because you want to dissent from its party line?

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes, it’s a matter of gradation. It’s not an echo chamber for me because so many of you have different opinions, but generally we all care about what is true and the future of life on this planet.

            So it’s easier to have discussions around the parts we disagree over.

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              generally we all care about what is true and the future of life on this planet

              But (to stay true to the spirit of debate I just defended) is this not itself a straw man? Do you think, say, religious conservatives would say that they don’t “care about what is true and the future of life on this planet”?

              • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                5 days ago

                Good question, and they might. In which case it would be easier to have a discussion with them.

                However, I think much of the time they cleave to a more Kantian morality, where acting correctly / virtuously in accordance with an identifiable authority. They may also believe that the future of life on this planet is trivial when compared to quality of life on some metaphysical plane.

                I have this discussion with my neighbour constantly who is nice, but she keeps saying I’ve “got to have faith” and that “they have a plan to fix all this when the time is right” all while real people are suffering and dying, and their suffering is indelible — it can never be made to have not happened — and they will never be coming back.

                It’s really hard to have a real discussion about reality with someone like that.

                • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Fair enough about literal religious nuts people of firmly held religious convictions. This side of the pond there are very few of those, fortunately. My basic point is that plenty of people who vote “wrong” (Trump, for example) would actually agree with you on most of your vision of the good society. The questions are mainly over how to get there. This IMO is the tragedy of democratic politics today, and specifically the USA. An almost absolute breakdown in communication.

    • Proudly Green@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s just as much a left-wing echo chamber as Truth Social is a right-wing one - and that’s a problem in both cases.

      Very much so. And it seems to be getting even worse lately. I mostly post socialist and third party stuff, but if I dare say I don’t like a democrat or something, I get automatic “YOU’RE ACTUALLY A TRUMPER!! MAGA-NAZI!!!”

      Bans and hateful DM’s. All because I don’t like the 2-party system. lol

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    The people that get their fee fees hurt from seeing opinions they disagree with, cf all the whinging abt tankies in the comments.

  • Flickerby@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    The tankies are far and away the largest problem. It’s the number one reason why lemmy hasn’t grown. Even when I signed up years ago from the reddit exodus every post I saw was heavily cautioned with “it’s filled with tankies”. And now every mention of it is being scrubbed for that reason. The second problem is the smaller size but see reason 1 for that.

    Third problem is the sign up process being so excruciating. I understand it’s to prevent bots but for every 2 bots it’s preventing it’s probably also preventing 1 actual user from signing up. I love this place despite the small size, because I can just sequester off all the tankies entirely on Connect, but if the creators don’t realize they’re actively standing in the way of growth by the actions they’re taking and step away from all their moderation actions to focus on administration and development instead the outlook doesn’t look too great.