• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2311 year ago

    “We as American Jews believe that ‘never again’ means never again for anyone, and that includes Palestinians,” said JVP, referring to the refrain repeated by the Jewish American community regarding the need to prevent genocide. “‘Never again’ is this very moment.”

    Something so common sense will surely fall on deaf ears.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -531 year ago

        This is not genocide. The Israeli army has a massive amount of weapons with which it could commit genocide if it truly wanted to. The situation is horrible and the loss of civilians lives is also horrible but this is not genocide. Misusing that term risks it losing all meaning.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          491 year ago

          Go back and read the UN Convention on Genocide, as this most certainly is that. Unquestionably.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              351 year ago

              Where in the definition of genocide does the attempt have to be successful before you call it genocide or try stop it?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -27
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Israel has nuclear weapons and f16s. If they tried to commit genocide they would succeed. If Palestinians had those weapons, they would literally commit genocide immediately as it is stated in Hamas’ founding charter.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 year ago

                  Israel is dependent on foreign aid, do you think their allies wouldn’t notice if they bombed and killed millions of people at once? There would be a response from other countries in the area as well. Even the Nazis took a lot of effort to hide the holocaust during the execution of it. Where in Hamas’ founding charter does it state “we will commit genocide if we have the power.”? And even if it did, Hamas is not the Palestinian people, they haven’t had an election since 2006 and there are several other militant groups within Palestine.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Did you not read the UN Convention on Genocide? You know, the things Jewish people said they’d never forget?

              Here’s a PDF it’s only like 4 pages: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.pdf

              Whether or not it’s true if the population is increasing in spite of all of these things isn’t relevant. What’s relevant is that Israel is attempting several of them (only need 1 for it to be genocide), and they have been for several decades.

              • ???
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                I found this gem today and couldn’t help but hare it

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 year ago

                  Let me quote some portions of the Hamas Covenant to you, and you tell me if you can find anything this insane in Israeli founding documents. Like it or not, Hamas has clearly stated its opposition to peace and its genocidal intent.

                  Intent is the difference.

                  Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will abolish it, just as it abolished others before it

                  Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.

                  There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.

                  [The Jews] were behind the French Revolution, the Communist revolution and most of the revolutions we heard and hear about, here and there. With their money they formed secret societies, such as Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, the Lions and others in different parts of the world for the purpose of sabotaging societies and achieving Zionist interests. With their money they were able to control imperialistic countries and instigate them to colonize many countries in order to enable them to exploit their resources and spread corruption there.

                  You may speak as much as you want about regional and world wars. They were behind World War I, when they were able to destroy the Islamic Caliphate, making financial gains and controlling resources. They obtained the Balfour Declaration, formed the League of Nations through which they could rule the world. They were behind World War II, through which they made huge financial gains by trading in armaments, and paved the way for the establishment of their state. It was they who instigated the replacement of the League of Nations with the United Nations and the Security Council to enable them to rule the world through them. There is no war going on anywhere, without having their finger in it.

                  [The Zionist invasion] relies greatly in its infiltration and espionage operations on the secret organizations it gave rise to, such as the Freemasons, The Rotary and Lions clubs, and other sabotage groups. All these organizations, whether secret or open, work in the interest of Zionism and according to its instructions. They aim at undermining societies, destroying values, corrupting consciences, deteriorating character and annihilating Islam. It is behind the drug trade and alcoholism in all its kinds so as to facilitate its control and expansion.

                  Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Muslim people. “May the cowards never sleep.”

                  It is the duty of the followers of other religions to stop disputing the sovereignty of Islam in this region, because the day these followers should take over there will be nothing but carnage, displacement and terror.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -17
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What would you have Israel do? Not defend itself? Because by doing so according to your logic Israel is committing genocide then.

                If Hamas didn’t keep attacking Israel and instead focused on improving the lives for residents in Gaza then Israel would not attack them.

                Also based on that link you cited and your logic palestinians are committing genocide against the Israelis

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  171 year ago

                  False dichotomy. There are more options than “do nothing” and “force the evacuation of an entire populated area before bombing the entire region to the stone age”. It doesn’t take a political genius to see that.

                • ???
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 year ago

                  What would you have Israel do? Not defend itself?

                  Seems like absolutely no one has a problem with that. It’s just when Israel bombs hospitals and shit and then says Hamas was doing whatever there, that’s where people are drawing the line.

                • prole
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  Nice pivot. Didn’t work, but good try.

                  Also based on that link you cited and your logic palestinians are committing genocide against the Israelis

                  What a fucking joke. I guess just pretend you don’t know how power dynamics work.

                • floppade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Defend itself against what? It, the UK, and the US started it and refused to relent. Yeah I expect Israel to give the illegal settlements back entirely. They intentionally encouraged too many people to move in in order to justify illegal expansion. So yeah send them back, pay the immigrants for Israel’s fraud and con, and give the Palestinian’s their land back.

                  You steal someone’s car, and you make it right by giving it back and covering any damages. Just because Israel stole a really big “car” doesn’t change how right and wrong works. You give it back and apologize whether you’re a 3 year old or Netanyahu.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              121 year ago

              yes, for the last 18 years Palestinians haven’t had anything to do, and had such horrid conditions that they had a population boom and over 50% of the people in the Gaza Strip are under 18 years old, but interestingly these population booms only happen when a group of people hits on extremely bad circumstances for a longer period of time

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -17
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Facts don’t matter to these Anti Semites.

              The UN has issued countless human rights notices against Israel, and how many against Hamas or Saudi Arabia?

              It’s a clearly biased organization that people alternatively take as gospel when it suits their needs or ignore when it doesn’t.

              It’s obviously not a genocide. If it were, Gaza wouldn’t have a growing population. It’s really that fucking simple, you can’t redefine something to suit your bullshit narrative.

              Israel isn’t trying to destroy a people or a nation. The millions of Arabs living peacefully in Israel are proof of that. They’re GOING to destroy a terrorist organization that’s holding a territory hostage though.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                81 year ago

                People calling out Israel’s crimes isn’t being antisemitic. Israelis forcing Palestinians from their homes, creating illegal settlements, running an apartheid state, having a large open air prison were half the population are children, and constantly killing Palestinian children is fucking abhorrent. Fuck Israel and fuck anyone that supports their crimes against humanity.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -91 year ago

                  You’re here supporting terrorists who explicitly call for the extermination of the Jewish people. You’re holding Israel to a standard you refuse to hold others in the region too. They’re stuck in the sandbox with terrorists, they’re just playing by the same rules they’re being subjected to.

              • katy ✨
                link
                fedilink
                71 year ago

                Fun fact; Palestinians are Semites.

                So being anti Palestine is, by definition, anti Semitic.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m not saying all of these commenters are anti semites but many of them have been conditioned to basically think that whatever Hamas does is a legitimate way of responding to grievances (some certainly with merit) and whatever Israel does respond to that is genocide.

                If Al qaeda was based in Canada what would the U.S. have done after 9/11? Let them just continue to operate?

                I have asked several posters on here to give me some better options for Israel than to destroy Hamas. So far not a single one has obliged.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -81 year ago

                  They can’t engage because then they’ll need to admit their hypocrisy and bias.

                  Israel’s being held to a standard different than everyone else in the region. They understand better than most western nations what it’s like to live in that sandbox. They’re playing by the same rules as their neighbors and after last week the people blaming them don’t have a leg to stand on…

        • floppade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          281 year ago

          They are doing that. They are bombing an area after making it impossible for people to evacuate by giving an impossible deadline. They are bombing the areas people are told to take on the way to evacuate. The people they are bombing have no defenses or way to escape. Israel’s own government officials have referred to Palestinians as animals and said there are no innocents among them. That’s what genocide looks like before having the benefit of hindsight.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          231 year ago

          This is not genocide. The German army has a massive amount of weapons with which it could commit genocide if it truly wanted to. The situation is horrible and the loss of civilians lives is also horrible but this is not genocide. Misusing that term risks it losing all meaning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      441 year ago

      Still, it doesn’t go without saying. They might ignore it, but they can’t pretend nobody said anything.

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I asked once why the law (Jewish religious law) said don’t kill, steal etc then said of Amallites not to leave one alive, man, woman or child. The answer? “Jewish law doesn’t apply to gentiles.”

      • TechyDad
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Thinking about this some more, I have a feeling you misinterpreted what “Jewish law doesn’t apply to gentiles” means. If I, a Jew, eat bacon, it’s considered a sin. If a non-Jew eats bacon, it’s not considered a sin. Jewish laws (restrictions, observances, etc) don’t apply to non-Jews. It doesn’t mean that Jews are allowed to treat non-Jews however they want with no repercussions.

      • TechyDad
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        This isn’t quite true. First of all, I’m guessing you mean the Amalekites. The reason they are singled out is because they followed the Israelites during the Exodus from Egypt. They attacked from the rear to target the slowest people - the elderly and children. This gave them a “special status” so to speak with a commandment to wipe them out.

        That being said, there are no Amalekites nowadays. There might be spiritual successors of them - people who want to wipe out all Jews no matter what and who will start with the elderly and children - but these people don’t get “Amalekite treatment.”

        Apart from this exception (which, again, has no relevance in the modern world), Jewish law absolutely applies to how we treat non-Jews.

  • floppade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    501 year ago

    I appreciate the work they do to cut through the mandatory pro-Israel dialogue in the states. “Not in our name!” ❤️

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      And for their efforts, the ADL labels Jewish Voice for Peace an extremist anti-Semitic hate group. 😂

      • floppade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I’m not surprised. I remember they had that position a few years back too. Little has changed unfortunately.

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    431 year ago

    Cease fire wont stop the humanitarian crisis that sparked this. They need water and power and humanitarian aid that israel has blocked.

  • rayyyy
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    Israel has the world’s sympathy and support but if they retaliate brutally and massively that sympathy and support will shift to the Palestinians.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        361 year ago

        I think it’s very confused and polarized. Neither side is even remotely in the right at this point, and those who suffer have almost no agency. The only third rail here is the Israeli people. They can make the madness stop.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          The civilians on both sides aren’t in the right? I misunderstand you, and am being genuine here. Morality/ethics of a conflict can’t just be measured and analyzed by the actions and consequences of the combatants. The people caught in the middle, whether Palestinian or Jewish are the real losers in this. War has no real victor…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 year ago

            They’re saying the powers at play, the big boys, on both sides are fucked. The people in the middle, the civilians on either side, have no real say in what’s going on, they just get slaughtered.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I find it so crazy that people can pick sides in this conflict. I don’t know if there’s a nation, military or people in the middle east that doesn’t have the blood of thousands of innocent civilians on their hands. With how brutal every single conflict is its no wonder that the survivors feel the need to pick up arms and continue the cycle of pain and suffering

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Since Israel has already killed at least twice the number of Palestine civilians than the number of Israeli citizen that were killed by Hamas, this is absolutely true.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      Every single time this type of shit plays out the same way. Outrage at whichever Palestinian group did whatever. Outrage at Israel’s response. Then people taking what they think are reasonable sides in a religious war, then finally things calm back down to the fucked up status quo. I see no reason this will be any different.

      • TechyDad
        link
        fedilink
        181 year ago

        I think there are four factors at play here. They’re mixed together in an extremely messy fashion and overlap quite a bit, but they are:

        1. The people on both sides fear for their safety. The Palestinians fear the Israeli government and military taking action against them. The Israeli people fear rocket attacks and raids like the one that just happened. When a populace lives in fear, it leads to -

        2. Extremist groups are in charge. You have Hamas on one side whose stated goal is to kill all Jews. (Not just in Israel, but across the world.) You have the right wing Israeli government on the other side who push for horrible actions against the Palestinians in the name of “safety.”

        3. Foreign interference. Iran on one side is arming/helping Hamas. On the other side, evangelical Christians help the settlers and push the Israeli government because they think Jesus will come back if Israel suffers a big enough attack. (Peace would prevent that attack and stop Jesus from returning.)

        4. A long and bloody history. Both sides remember when they were killed by the other side. Both sides refuse to leave the past in the past and intend on making the other side pay. The problem here is that the cycle of violence never breaks. If you always have to attack because “they did X to us” then they will feel like they always need to attack because you did Y to them. It goes around and around and never changes no matter how much everyone suffers.

        How do you untangle this mess? If I knew that, I’d have the Nobel Peace Prize. I wish I did know. I’d set the peace prize aside in a second, tell the world what to do, and stop it all. Unfortunately, I’m no diplomat. (Some of the best diplomats have failed in this arena.) I can see what’s going on, but I have no clue how to stop it.

        The best I can think of is that perhaps UN security forces need to move in. Not to attack one side or another, but to keep both sides away from each other. Sort of like the national version of putting two kids who were fighting in time out until things cool down. But again, I’m no diplomat so for all I know that would make things worse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          You act as though both sides are equivalent.

          They are not. Israel is an apartheid state. Palestinians are legally deprived of human rights and restricted to ghettos. Hamas is merely an extremist group that offers Palestinians something, even if its something they cannot deliver on and have no legitimate means of achieving. Palestinians have been massacred by Israel since its inception. Israelis have occasionally died in comparatively small numbers from Hamas attacks. Hamas is not Palestine though. And hamas has no legal power within the Israeli state. The Israeli state is entirely responsible for the current state of affairs and for the ongoing violence.

          Palestinians have no state. They have no home. They are kept in ghettos. They are currently facing one of the largest humanitarian crises of the 21st century. The Israeli state could stop it all tomorrow. They could stop it all right now. Unconditionally grant equal citizenship to all Palestinians, return them their homes, give them 50% representation in the Israeli government, and formally condemn the racism and genocidal rhetoric of the Netanyahu administration and the many war crimes committed both by him and the IDF and the Israeli police force.

          Its entirely up to Israel. Palestinians can do none of these things. Their only available recourse is extremism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I agree with one caveat: the Palestinians can help themselves the same way India, South Africa, and other colonial peoples have. Non-violent resistance gets really good results in democracies. It’s not easy, but it’s less dangerous than attacking a modern military.

            The hardest step is getting rid of Hamas, which is more like a mafia than a government. They’re more interested in keeping their power and position with help from Iran. In South Africa, Nelson Mandela was a violent terrorist before he turned to 100% non-violence.

            Here’s an interesting article that no one will read:

            https://time.com/5338569/nelson-mandela-terror-list/

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              10
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I agree with one caveat: the Palestinians can help themselves the same way India, South Africa, and other colonial peoples have. Non-violent resistance gets really good results in democracies.

              They tried. They tried a lot (well the first intifada also had a violent element but yk). The result was the Oslo accords, which were almost there until the then-PM was assassinated and Netenyahu who succeeded him just called the whole thing off. Since you mentioned India, the situation in Palestine is more like the troubles in Northern Ireland. You need people who actually care about human rights (many Israelis do, but enough don’t that Netenyahu was/has been PM for a total of 16+ years).

              The hardest step is getting rid of Hamas, which is more like a mafia than a government.

              Hamas aren’t actually 100% opposed to peace. They’ve already made three good faith efforts (2008 ceasefire, 2012 ceasefire, 2012-2013 united government), but in all three Israel actively rejected peace.

              Edit: I know it’s weird that a terrorist organization is being the (slightly) reasonable side here, but yeah the fact that the conflict went on for so long is on Israel’s far-right party and Netenyahu specifically for rejecting peace time and time again. As soon as peace comes Hamas will either mellow out into an Islamist government or die off.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                The result was the Oslo accords, which were almost there until the then-PM was assassinated and Netenyahu who succeeded him just called the whole thing off.

                The reason why israeli people became more conservative during that time was due to Hamas executing several terrorist strikes during the Oslo Accords. Not surprisingly, the extremists on all sides hate peace – prime minister Rabin was murdered by a Jewish extremist.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              I can only think to part of a response Orwell had for pacifists:

              I am not interested in pacifism as a ‘moral phenomenon’. If Mr Savage and others imagine that one can somehow ‘overcome’ the German army by lying on one’s back, let them go on imagining it, but let them also wonder occasionally whether this is not an illusion due to security, too much money and a simple ignorance of the way in which things actually happen. As an ex-Indian civil servant, it always makes me shout with laughter to hear, for instance, Gandhi named as an example of the success of non-violence. As long as twenty years ago it was cynically admitted in Anglo-Indian circles that Gandhi was very useful to the British government. So he will be to the Japanese if they get there. Despotic governments can stand ‘moral force’ till the cows come home; what they fear is physical force.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                Yeah, that’s correct:

                Despotic governments can stand ‘moral force’ till the cows come home; what they fear is physical force.

                That’s why I said democracies are vulnerable to non-violent resistance.

                Democracies, like Israel, are the opposite of authoritarian governments. Developed democracies can withstand all the force you send at them because they rule with the consent of the governed and have much larger resources at their disposal.

                They are more vulnerable to soft power. Hamas already has broadcast abilities. They should literally get rid of most weapons, and start broadcasting 24/7 about the hardships of living in the West Bank and Gaza. They have an unlimited amount of ammo because Israel genuinely makes people’s lives terrible.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  just because a place calls its self or even is a democracy doesn’t mean it can’t be despotic.

                  there is no inherent “democracy is not despotic” we have seen plenty of despotic democratic governments, almost all of them only toppled due to outside influence.

                  and a side point Democracies aren’t more resistant to force, they are just a little less likely to collapse due to a general trust in the standing government, nothing to do with resources.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              THEY’VE TRIED.

              Doesn’t help when most of the “offers” they get are basically, “you give up at least half of your land (including most of the Mediterranean Coast) and in return, we’ll stop genociding you.”

              And those are the “good” offers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You are so delusional about this situation that you think somehow a one state solution could work at this point. A two state solution is the only answer but unfortunately the leadership on both sides right now would never let that happen and the leadership on one side in particular (Hamas) is set on full extermination of the other party.

            • floppade [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              The delusional thing is Britain thinking they could displace 750,000 to create a country out of nowhere and expect the indigenous to silently die off.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                They’d done it so many times before without repercussions… Lol

                • floppade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  6
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They colonize but everyone fights back. That’s precisely my point. It’s normal and natural to fight back against that. It’s delusional to think it’s not.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              Hamas is an extremist group, they are only considered a reasonable thing to support because Palestinians do not have human rights and are confined to ghettos. One party in this situation is actively genociding the other, and quite understandably Palestinians are more inclined to listen to extremists than the Israeli state genociding them. Israel has actively sabotaged every single attempt at negotiations since the mid 90s. Netanyahu can be thanked for that. Him and the racists who support him.

              Hamas is nothing if Palestinians had rights. Palestinians are just people, they are not an army they are not a militia. They deserve human rights. Israel could do that today. They deserve their homes back. Israel could do that today. Hamas has nothing to do with it. There’s never an excuse to deprive a race of people their rights and freedoms. Genocide is never acceptable. Apartheid is never acceptable.

              • TechyDad
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                The Palestinians in Gaza, at this point, can’t choose to vote Hamas out of office if they wanted to. Hamas won with a plurality (not a majority) in 2006 and has cancelled all future elections. They’ve used aid meant to support the Palestinian people to make rockets to attack Israel. There’s no trust in the Israeli side that Hamas would stick to their word. Netenyahu needs to go, but so does Hamas.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Who elected Hamas? It’s interesting you say Palestinians have no other choice. Who governs the Palestinians in the West Bank?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  Hamas cannot change the apartheid state. They have tried repeatedly since the mid 90s and every time America and Israel have sabotaged negotiations and refused to give Palestinians equal rights.

                  Hamas was elected once and there have been no elections since. They also have no actual political power in Israel so it doesn’t really make a difference who is elected. Netanyahu wants to commit genocide, he has no interest in changing anything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          How do you untangle this mess? If I knew that, I’d have the Nobel Peace Prize.

          I wouldn’t wish that on you. Former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin won the Nobel in 1994, and was assassinated for it the following year.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          How do you untangle this mess? If I knew that, I’d have the Nobel Peace Prize. I wish I did know.

          Nah it’s actually pretty easy. Just needs someone who isn’t Netnyahu.

          • TechyDad
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            That’s definitely a start. Unfortunately, just swapping Netenyahu out with someone less extreme wouldn’t get Hamas to stop their attacks. It wouldn’t cause the people on both sides to feel safe enough to trust in a peace process and to forgive past actions.

            There are a lot of factors in play and the solution to this, if there is one, is going to be very complicated and difficult to achieve. It will be worth it, but it won’t be easy.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s definitely a start. Unfortunately, just swapping Netenyahu out with someone less extreme wouldn’t get Hamas to stop their attacks.

              I mean Hamas already agreed to stop their attacks in ceasefires before (see: 2008 and 2012 ceasefires). It was then Netenyahu who didn’t lift the blockade, therefore not holding Israel’s end of the agreements. It was also Netenyahu who stopped the peace process in 1995 because he’s Netenyahu.

              This is what I meant by just needs someone who isn’t Netenyahu. Hamas has proven that they’re willing to engage in dialogue, despite what’s written in their charter. It’s Netenyahu who doesn’t want that, so he’s basically acting as a barrier between both sides and peace.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You are defending a group who as part of their founding charter calls for the extermination of all Jews on earth not just in Israel. You are at best wildly ignorant on this subject if not dishonest.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness
                  link
                  fedilink
                  41 year ago

                  I made easily provable statements and can provide sources on them. If you have proof that anything I said is wrong, you’re welcome to provide it.

              • TechyDad
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                You would also need someone on the Palestinian side that the Israelis would trust to keep their word and not attack. That trust just isn’t there and will be difficult to rebuild.

                I’m not completely disagreeing with you. The illegal settlements need to go. I’d like to see any illegal settlements responded to by having a special group of Israeli police, working with Palestinian authorities and not just moving in on their own, arresting the settlers instead of the military moving in to protect them.

                There’s also the outside influence to consider. Evangelical Christians love the settlers. They help them and any politicians who would protect them. They’d work against a politician who promised to arrest them.

                There are a lot of factors in play and the solution won’t be an easy one.

                • floppade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  My bad for my tone. I was tired and didn’t noticed how sassy I came off.

                  I don’t think my suggestion will ever happen, but I think it’s what needs to happen.

                  I don’t think Palestinians would trust IDF soldiers to be escorts to be honest, but I suppose white police/soldiers played a role in integration in the US.

                  As far as implementing solutions, I think the Palestinians should decide that for themselves. I don’t think the international community will allow that for MANY reasons, Christians being just one. And until we can stop the ethnic cleansing policy from its current implementation, there is no room to even try anything.

                  But yes, the evangelical Christian relationship with Israel is VERY different than the relationship of Israel to Jews. I understand the propaganda I see in the Jewish community, and I understand how it’s harder to see this issue clearly when you’re more likely to have family members, friends, and memories made in a region.

                  Christian fantasize about Israel being theirs or seeing themselves as the true Israel already, and that it’s a metaphor for them and not Jews.

                  that’s not even getting into how all the neighboring countries feel and how all their allies and enemies feel. It’s a lot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Not to simplify your points and overall message because I really appreciate your words and thoughts, but game theory would do a lot to explain point 4 pretty tidily. The fucked up thing about that, though is that the hate and division is so entrenched that the fact that these people have to deal with one another all the time, has no effect in how they treat each other.

          Then again, this gets into some anthropological territory of how culture begats culture, and a culture of violence can never be anything else (me adlibbing here on theoretical anthro), but I digress… The people that perpetrate the attacks are so far removed from the rank and file and every day experiences, and have so much to gain from continuing it, that why on Earth would they stop? To rational and reasonable people, it seems absurd, but so does how the Fossil Fuel industry persists in plunging us into extinction, so it all bears out, if you ask me.

          • TechyDad
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I completely agree. Hamas’ leadership isn’t based in Gaza. Attacks on Gaza don’t affect them because they’re living in luxury (in Qatar IIRC). Meanwhile, they’ve cancelled all elections so the Palestinians can’t just choose a new government.

            And this applies to the outside influence as well. Iranians and evangelical Christians don’t need to live with the chaos they help to thrive. They get to sit back, thousands of miles away, safe from any consequences. Since they don’t suffer any consequences, why would they stop? And if they don’t stop, it makes it that much harder to achieve peace.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          UN created this quagmire so let them sort it. Reset borders to the original plan, Jerusalem becomes its own city state, administered by the UN. It will anger everyone but let the UN take responsibility and clean up the mess they made (sort of).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I do. This time the scope has changed and a big army is going to engage. This isn’t going to be tit for tat.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It has never been tit-for-tat at any point during this conflict. Unless you’re going back to the fucking crusades or something.

          Since ww2, no. The Palestinians aren’t even close to being capable of going tit-for-tat against the US Military Industrial Complex (aka Israel’s military).

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re missing the part where Israel’s reaction to an attack (often on the IDF) ends up with casualties at least one or two orders of magnitude higher. Nearly all civilians who are already living an oppressed life and being illegally displaced from their homes and their land.

        One has unquestionable support by the most powerful military that has ever existed.

        But yeah man, both sides are the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        People have this bright idea that the horrible status quo will somehow change by diplomatic means. It never will when the whole conflict is based on the ideology which sole goal is the genocide of the Jews.

        • WhatTrees
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          It will never end as long as the Israeli government keeps treating the Palestinians as subhuman. That’s what creates more terrorists every day. Hamas is a response to Israel’s continued occupation and oppression. The Nakba has been going on for over 50 years and people still out here acting like Palestine started all this.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Bro it almost changed three times in the past thirty years (1995, 2008 and 2012). Guess who ruined all three: Yes, Netnyahu. The conflict isn’t as unsolvable as you think; it just needs a sane government not headed by a far-right genocidal maniac.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      That’s the way it happens most times. This time, though, will probably be very brutal with lots of blood on both sides.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Is that pvc or steel in the thumbnail? Impressive strategy regardless. Guess they don’t need their arms?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      If you’re trying to make a point, sometimes you gotta get drastic. Human chains as a form of protest are a time honored tactic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Black so it looks like ABS. Still can’t cut it off without injuring the protesters.

      Hardest part is when your nose itches.

  • @betz24
    link
    English
    -141 year ago

    Not commenting on the actual crisis going on but who cares what the American Jews think? They aren’t in Israel and have never lived a day over there. It’s almost like American Irish giving their opinion of Brexit. Yes we know what is going on is wrong, but the audience voicing their opinion barely has more relevance than the average person. It must be exhausting on boths sides to have foreigners voice their opinions on what is an actual war zone right now.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      When a common refrain of pro-Israel propaganda is “All criticism is antisemitism”, you bet your fucking ass that the opinion of American Jews is important.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Similarly, when people assume that because you’re a Jew you must support Israel, it’s also important to make that distinction.

      • @betz24
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Not commenting on the actual protest going on but who cares what the random Fedi thinks? They aren’t in the protest and have never participated a minute over there.

      • @betz24
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        This is a social forum. It’s made for comments? You don’t have to care what I think and I’m fine with being wrong, but I hope you aren’t on Lemmy just for an echo chamber.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wow, so, a public space is appropriate for public comment, like, perhaps a protest is a legitimate expression of opinion?

          betz24, I’m about to exercise my freedom of expression on a social forum made for comments, but, your comment (not you, I don’t know you. Big distinction) is very stupid. With high emphasis on both “very” and “stupid”. It also displays an absolute lack of self-awareness which I think would be personally enriching for you to start practicing.

          • @betz24
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Dusty thanks for the feedback. Clearly a lot of people are upset at the comment I made. As a person with several friends in Israel, I felt this article wasnt doing the people justice.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Comparing the Jewish diaspora to the American Irish isn’t even apples and oranges, it’s apples and ice cream trucks. They’re not even in the same category.

      People with Jewish ancestry are born with a “birthright” to become a citizen of Israel (including the option for dual citizenship, of course). It’s just a completely different and unique situation.

      • TechyDad
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        I might have a “birthright” to become a citizen of Israel, but that doesn’t mean that I, as an American Jew, have a strong connection to Israel. It definitely doesn’t mean that I have influence over what Israel does or am somehow responsible for Israel’s actions.

        I’ve recently seen people celebrating attacks on a Jewish temple and bakery in America because “they are a symbol of Zionist aggression.” The person was justifying anti-semitic attacks on American Jews because “Israel did X.” I expect this antisemitism from the right, but this was coming from someone on the left. As an American Jew, it’s scary to suddenly face antisemitism for something I have no influence over from both sides of the aisle.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I’ve recently seen people celebrating attacks on a Jewish temple and bakery in America because “they are a symbol of Zionist aggression.

          Got a link? Because a lot of those videos have been proven to be disinformation, and videos from years ago completely unrelated to the conflict. One of them was people celebrating after a soccer game.

      • @betz24
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        deleted by creator