• spriteblood
    link
    fedilink
    1559 months ago

    Updated headline:
    Does violate gag order, justice system to do nothing about it because rules don’t apply to the wealthy

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -289 months ago

        By even the most critical standards, his net worth is about $2.5 billion and has access to just under half a billion in cash. He’s nowhere near as rich as he says he is, but he’s still well within the 1% of 1%.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          58
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No. Just no. The federal court and new York State Court have both thoroughly debunked his net worth and it ends up with “probably not able to afford to pay debts even with selling his most valuable property”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            "even with selling his most valuable property our nations nuclear secrets to the Saudi’s".

            I fixed that for you

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          269 months ago

          even the most critical standards, his net worth is about $2.5 billion and has access to just under half a billion in cash.

          I would hardly call the Forbes estimate as “the most critical standards”. They don’t have an accurate account of his debts, nor do they have an accurate accounting of his liquidity.

          No one just has half a billion dollars in liquidity laying around, liquidity loses value at the rate of inflation. Unless hes okay with losing at least 18.5 million dollars a year in depreciation, that money has long been invested into some kind of property or has been used to pay debts.

        • TWeaK
          link
          fedilink
          English
          229 months ago

          Net work is supposed to be net, ie including debts.

        • prole
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          What about if we consider all the fraud, unpaid bills, dodged taxes, money laundering (his dad used to buy millions in casino chips and then get rid of them to illegally prop up his failing casinos)? How much does he actually have?

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s does not violate the very narrow gag order set by Justice Engoron, because AG James is not “court staff.” That doesn’t make it legal, doxxing could be charged in either New York State or Federal court (because James is a State employee, and an “officer of the law”).

      But it won’t. Nothing is going to happen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Imprisoning a former president for contempt of court, even as blatant as this, is always going to be a topic of skittishness among the judges.

      This is an institution that typically loathes setting new precedent when it can avoid it, and imprisoning a former president, one who is running again especially, is a Rubicon that is going to intimidate even the most tough on corruption judge you can have on that bench.

      The sheer unprecedentedness of this case and the others involving trump are gonna go snails pace simply because of how freaked out the judges will be over making sure every i and t have been dotted and crossed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        109 months ago

        They’re setting a precedent either way.

        Either hold decorum over the individual or abandon it.

        How Trump acts, and what he is allowed to get away with, is carte blanche for his followers paying attention.

        If you want to be wealthy, act like the wealthy, right?

        The judges either have spines or they don’t. In that same vein, we either have laws that apply equally, or we don’t have respect for the law across the board.

        This is remedial psychology.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        As much as my justice boner is deflated by this statement, I’d rather have Trump convicted by a jury while having a competent attorney making smart decisions and defending him zealously. The last thing I want is his conviction to be overturned because someone took a shortcut.

        • SolidGrue
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          And, the standards of prosecution need to be set as high as possible because if history has anything to teach us, it’s that the GOP will come after Biden as soon as that office changes hands. The precedents are there to protect future, potentially controversial leaders from (begging your pardon) trumped-up charges.

      • @Case
        link
        39 months ago

        Why? The law should be applied equally, prince or pauper.

        I don’t give a fuck about tradition and precedent - a traitor as the head of the nation is unprecedented too.

        Gather evidence, make a case, throw the book at him - with stiffer sentencing solely because as a former president, he SHOULD be held to a higher standard.

        Just like cops should be held to a higher standard than a civilian, but I digress.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      Well I’d personally love to see Trump get so many things that are coming to him for his many criminal activities, the gag order they’re referencing was only applied narrowly to him speaking about court staff. Letitia James is not court staff, so he hasn’t actually broken that gag order at least as written currently. But it’s obvious stochastic terrorism per his usual mo. And any other person would have the book thrown at them for this by the judge, gag order or no gag order.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The hate-filled loser literally can’t help himself! I can’t wait until we never have to hear his name again…

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      139 months ago

      Unfortunately kids will be learning about this in US history for the rest of time, just like my kid had to learn about the election of 1824

      • uphillbothways
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Lol. Imagine having kids in this hellscape. Imagine doing that to a child.

      • @thepianistfroggollum
        link
        English
        39 months ago

        You’re assuming there will be a US around by then. I think we’ll be a fascist theocracy in less than 20 years, considering the state of our government. Probably much sooner.

        Trump will either be celebrated or erased.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          “D’nald Troomp was an emperor of the late Merkin Empire who attempted to retain power when his supporters, known as Maggies, stormed the temple where the priestly class was conducting a sacred ceremony to transfer the emperorhood to Jobe Iden.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        I can accept that if his name is always brought up as “first convicted president, trump”

      • eric
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Well here’s hoping the rest of time isn’t too long.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      129 months ago

      Not even his death will stop the discourse about him. He’s done so much damage, we will be talking about him for generations.

      Unfortunately it’s just the beginning. Imagine when someone comes along with his same general agenda and tactics, but who has actual charisma and intelligence. It’s only matter of time

      • Bleeping Lobster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There’s a podcast I love called ‘BudPod’. It’s two well-educated British comedians, ostensibly about current events, but often devolving into poo and wee puns. I’m catching up with current events and atm they’re discussing Boris Johnson, and how even with something as codified as the US constitution, all it’s taken to make it a nonsense was one man who said “… no.” Similarly when Johnson was asked to resign or not to breach certain conventions (we don’t have a constiution like the US), he just said “no”.

        We need more than a wink and a handshake when it comes to rules governing… well, governing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    He must be livid all these powerful black women going after him. There’s something poetic about that and my conspiracy is it’s intentional. Fuck his mysogynistic and racist ass.

  • downpunxx
    link
    fedilink
    329 months ago

    Why the fuck are they treating this fucking scumbag with kid gloves

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    169 months ago

    As with every other violation of court orders, here is the list of consequences Donald Trump is expected to be subject to: