Amazon execs destroyed years of evidence before FTC action, agency says::Amazon allegedly destroyed communications, turned controversial programs on and off, and knowingly raised prices for consumers, according to unsealed documents.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1691 year ago

    When the fuck are they going to stop treating these companies and executives with kid gloves?

    Why do they do these things, shred evidence, lie on the stand, and break almost every white collar law there is? Because there are little to no consequences. And if there are it’s for people in the “out” group. New money.

    Crack down on all of them. Shredding evidence should be an admission of guilt. Full stop.

  • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1181 year ago

    Split Amazon into retail and web services and then further split them into multiple different companies. Amazon has gotten way too big and stifling competition along the way.

    Do the same to Facebook too while we’re at it. Fucking hate speech central.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even though I’m not a fan of Apple, I am not sure how it could be split. Unlike other companies mentioned, Apple is firmly in consumer electronics business, except for Apple TV+ which is a recent addition.

        Their software products also exist to work only on specific hardware.

        Also, only today I figured out that they have their own office suite lol. Don’t know why I never thought about it before

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          They are heavily vertically integrated, even if split, they’d still work together as one company, because they simply don’t have any other choice.

          There are many products all of these companies have that aren’t profitable (f.e. YouTube would either die or get enshitified to hell, can’t see Prime Music surviving without the rest of the Prime ecosystem etc.).

          Splitting most of these up would not help anyone.

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            There are many products all of these companies have that aren’t profitable

            Splitting most of these up would not help anyone.

            Good.

            Companies have been using their profitable ventures to get dominant (or even solo) position in another market segment by undercutting the competition and then degrade their services as there’s no other alternative for customers.

            This should force them (and customers) to reconsider their offerings and the pricing for it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              Everyone is complaining about services raising prices all the time. YouTube introducing anti-adblock tech has caused an uproar.

              Do you know why YouTube is dominant? It’s because it’s subsidized. Running a service like that is more expensive than you could ever imagine and it’s free, thanks to subsidization.

              I’m not saying Google’s a good company, but consider how much value YouTube has brought into the world - it’s not only entertainment, but also education.

              It wouldn’t survive on it’s own.

              Splitting up companies makes no sense. They could (and in 99% of cases still would) work together as one. Regulating them and holding them accountable does, much more. Why not start there, instead of wasting your time here?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                That’s one of the issues with these business models, it’s hard to give a consumer something and then take it away later to turn a profit (enshittification).

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  So what you’re saying is that instead of allowing companies to enshitiffy, we just kill all of them instantly?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                It’s because it’s subsidized.

                Do you know why google is ad monopoly? Because they have all youtube info.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  There’s no way that’s true. It’s a piece of it for sure, but they are neither an ad monopoly or a monopoly dependent on YouTube info.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They (technically) already are. I work for Amazon, but I don’t get paid by “Amazon”. I get paid for the subsidiary I work for.

      Splitting is fine, but it’s easily dealt with by megacorps. If anything, if the idea is floated, it’s probably because they’re absolutely fine with it.

      If you want to break Amazon apart, do the one thing they hate. Enable their employees to unionize, and empower them to fight the decades-long HR machine that ruins corporate employees lives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Gotta go further and deeper then that too. There are other, larger and more diverse companies that are hiding in plain site behind the more popular business like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, etc…

    • @wooki
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Scandalist communism!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -241 year ago

      This would create a big strain on the job market. Good luck dealing with a flood of >50k employees looking for a job (vs a new employee fresh out of college)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        That’s not how this works at all.

        There are plenty of ways to deal with this, and issue a death penalty to the corporation while not punishing the workers:

        • Forced turnover of executives and board members (with jail time and high % fines), corporate watchdog for x amount of years

        • Dissolve the mega-corp into smaller corporations, and/or force all subsidiaries into a planned disengagement from parent company

        • Bail-out in the form of state ownership by government buying majority stake

        In any of the above, or even in a complete mega-corp dissolution the demand doesn’t disappear. If you want to have the argument that these “oh so wonderful stewards of business” are the reason people have jobs in the first place, you can’t ignore that demand is the reason those very same executives have jobs too.

        If they tear it down, someone will build something else to replace it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    571 year ago

    Treat the destruction of evidence as proof of guilt and assume the worst case scenario. Ya know, the thing we do with criminals.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 year ago

    They’ll fine Amazon a pittance, pocket it, declare victory, and there’s nothing we can do about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    The executives need to be charged and Amazon should be put on a tight regulatory leash, if not broken up completely

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Legislative to CEO: You get a $5 fine. Now stop doing that or I’ll increase it to $10! >:(

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    Get money out of politics and these problems go away (because they will be dealt with properly).