• AEsheron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nick was supposedly fired for failing to meet goals, goals he was apparently never informed that he should be targeting.

    • nyankas@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, Nick used that term and he‘s probably in a position to know if it‘s the right one.

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fired and laid off are like buy and purchase - perfect synonyms.

      • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “fired” implies “termination with cause”. That is, they believe you screwed up and so you were let go without severance, and in a pinch they’re willing to go to court on that.

        “Laid off” implies they did bulk downsizing and unless the company finds a way to weasel out of it, there’s going to be severance and employment insurance payouts and the like.

        In the Southern states this is a distinction without a difference because they just shoot you in the face and toss you into the body pit there regardless of the cause of the termination of your employment, but in the rest of the world this distinction is real.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “To be laid off”, or even better “to be let go”, are fucking euphemisms for “fired”, “kicked out”, etc.
      That sort of vocabulary is typically used by HR to sound more benevolent, whereas when it’s happening to you, you’ll use the more aggressive terms.

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to the guys who left, Management forced unrealistic targets on the Editor in Chief, then used him not meeting those targets as an excuse to fire him. Everybody else quit in response.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man people choose weird hills to fight over on the internet, you’re right. Firing implies the worker did something wrong, laid off implies that they didnt